The relationship between maternal oral health parameters, inflammatory blood markers, and the evaluation of their effects on preterm low birth weight.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07337-1
Isa Temur, Katibe Tugce Temur, Safak Necati Dönertas, Aycan Dal Dönertas, Mustafa Kacmaz
{"title":"The relationship between maternal oral health parameters, inflammatory blood markers, and the evaluation of their effects on preterm low birth weight.","authors":"Isa Temur, Katibe Tugce Temur, Safak Necati Dönertas, Aycan Dal Dönertas, Mustafa Kacmaz","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07337-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preterm birth significantly elevates neonatal mortality and morbidity, often resulting in developmental challenges and severe health consequences. Risk factor identification is essential for preventative measures. This research aimed to assess maternal oral health's effects on inflammatory blood markers and determine a possible relationship with preterm low birth weight (PLBW).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a cross-sectional and case-control design. A randomized cohort of fifty women who delivered low-birth-weight infants was compared to a matched control group of fifty women who delivered full-term infants. Oral health was evaluated using the DMFT (Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth), DMFS (Decayed, Missing, and Filled Surfaces), Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Pocket Depth (PD), and Clinical Attachment Level (CAL). Patient history and relevant hematological data were retrieved from medical records. Logistic regression modeling was conducted on variables exhibiting statistical significance (p < 0.05) following group comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The case group showed significantly higher oral health indices than the control group, with median DMFT scores of 7.14 vs. 4.74 (p = 0.013), DMFS scores of 20.58 vs. 12.08 (p = 0.026), PI values of 1.96 vs. 1.18, GI values of 2.03 vs. 1.20, and PD values of 2.61 mm vs. 2.00 mm (all p < 0.001). However, none of these parameters (DMFT, DMFS, PI, GI, or PD) were significant predictors of PLBW (p > 0.05). Weak positive correlations were observed between PI, GI, PD, and leukocyte counts (r = 0.240, p = 0.016; r = 0.248, p = 0.013; and r = 0.220, p = 0.028, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the study's limitations, the principal results suggest a statistically significant difference in oral health, with women delivering low birth weight infants exhibiting poorer outcomes than control groups. Analysis of secondary outcomes indicates that oral health is not an independent predictor of preterm birth; instead, its contribution may be indirect and through systemic inflammation. Effective collaboration between obstetricians and dentists is crucial for the early detection and management of oral health issues in pregnant patients. Prioritizing the creation of public health policies designed to reduce the incidence of preterm births and strengthen maternal-fetal well-being is essential.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07337-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preterm birth significantly elevates neonatal mortality and morbidity, often resulting in developmental challenges and severe health consequences. Risk factor identification is essential for preventative measures. This research aimed to assess maternal oral health's effects on inflammatory blood markers and determine a possible relationship with preterm low birth weight (PLBW).

Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional and case-control design. A randomized cohort of fifty women who delivered low-birth-weight infants was compared to a matched control group of fifty women who delivered full-term infants. Oral health was evaluated using the DMFT (Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth), DMFS (Decayed, Missing, and Filled Surfaces), Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Pocket Depth (PD), and Clinical Attachment Level (CAL). Patient history and relevant hematological data were retrieved from medical records. Logistic regression modeling was conducted on variables exhibiting statistical significance (p < 0.05) following group comparisons.

Results: The case group showed significantly higher oral health indices than the control group, with median DMFT scores of 7.14 vs. 4.74 (p = 0.013), DMFS scores of 20.58 vs. 12.08 (p = 0.026), PI values of 1.96 vs. 1.18, GI values of 2.03 vs. 1.20, and PD values of 2.61 mm vs. 2.00 mm (all p < 0.001). However, none of these parameters (DMFT, DMFS, PI, GI, or PD) were significant predictors of PLBW (p > 0.05). Weak positive correlations were observed between PI, GI, PD, and leukocyte counts (r = 0.240, p = 0.016; r = 0.248, p = 0.013; and r = 0.220, p = 0.028, respectively).

Conclusions: Considering the study's limitations, the principal results suggest a statistically significant difference in oral health, with women delivering low birth weight infants exhibiting poorer outcomes than control groups. Analysis of secondary outcomes indicates that oral health is not an independent predictor of preterm birth; instead, its contribution may be indirect and through systemic inflammation. Effective collaboration between obstetricians and dentists is crucial for the early detection and management of oral health issues in pregnant patients. Prioritizing the creation of public health policies designed to reduce the incidence of preterm births and strengthen maternal-fetal well-being is essential.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
母亲口腔健康参数、炎症性血液指标与早产儿低出生体重的关系及其影响评价
背景:早产显著提高新生儿死亡率和发病率,往往导致发育挑战和严重的健康后果。识别风险因素对预防措施至关重要。本研究旨在评估母亲口腔健康对炎症血液标志物的影响,并确定其与早产低出生体重(PLBW)的可能关系。方法:本研究采用横断面和病例对照设计。随机选出50名分娩低体重婴儿的妇女,与50名分娩足月婴儿的妇女组成的对照组进行比较。使用DMFT(蛀牙、缺牙和补牙)、DMFS(蛀牙、缺牙和补牙表面)、菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)、牙袋深度(PD)和临床附着水平(CAL)来评估口腔健康。从医疗记录中检索患者病史和相关血液学数据。结果:病例组口腔健康指数明显高于对照组,DMFT中位数为7.14比4.74 (p = 0.013), DMFS中位数为20.58比12.08 (p = 0.026), PI值为1.96比1.18,GI值为2.03比1.20,PD值为2.61 mm比2.00 mm (p均为0.05)。PI、GI、PD与白细胞计数呈弱正相关(r = 0.240, p = 0.016;R = 0.248, p = 0.013;r = 0.220, p = 0.028)。结论:考虑到研究的局限性,主要结果表明,在口腔健康方面存在统计学上的显著差异,分娩低出生体重婴儿的妇女比对照组表现出更差的结果。次要结局分析表明口腔健康不是早产的独立预测因子;相反,它的作用可能是间接的,通过全身性炎症。产科医生和牙医之间的有效合作对于妊娠患者口腔健康问题的早期发现和管理至关重要。必须优先制定旨在减少早产发生率和加强母婴健康的公共卫生政策。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and correlates of cesarean section delivery and physician attendance during cesarean section in Bangladesh: evidence from nationally representative data 2017-18. The role of sonographic estimated fetal weight compared to clinical assessment: superior accuracy only in extreme fetal weight cases. Mothers' perceptions of bonding with their newborns in different care settings: a descriptive qualitative study. Gestational ocular microvascular changes in healthy pregnancy: a longitudinal SS-OCTA study. Predicting cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies undergoing trial of labor: a multicenter cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1