Joint exposure to urban-rural status and medically underserved area residence and risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes in 2020.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-29 DOI:10.22605/RRH8373
Lakin Mauch, Andrew D Williams
{"title":"Joint exposure to urban-rural status and medically underserved area residence and risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes in 2020.","authors":"Lakin Mauch, Andrew D Williams","doi":"10.22605/RRH8373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study is to estimate the risk of severe COVID-19 among individuals residing in rural, medically underserved counties compared to those living in other counties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual-level COVID-19 hospitalization and death data and demographic variables were downloaded from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme was used to classify urban and rural counties. Health Resources and Services Administration's medically underserved area (MUA) designation was used to identify underserved counties. County-level data were drawn from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Analytic samples included data from Minnesota and Montana in 2020. Urban-rural/MUA joint exposure categories were created: rural/MUA, rural/non-MUA, urban/MUA, urban/non-MUA. Hierarchical logistic regression models estimated associations (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI)) between rurality, MUA status, joint urban-rural/MUA status, and severe COVID-19, overall and stratified by age and state. Models were adjusted for individual- and county-level demographics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The odds of severe outcomes among those living in rural counties were 13% lower (95%CI: 0.83-0.91) than those in urban counties. The odds of severe outcomes among those living in MUA counties were 24% higher (95%CI: 1.18-1.30) than those in non-MUA counties. For joint exposure analyses, the odds of severe outcomes were highest among those living in urban/MUA counties compared to those in rural/non-MUA counties (adjusted odds ratio: 1.36, 95%CI: 1.27-1.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In 2020, the risk of severe COVID-19 was more pronounced in urban counties and underserved areas. Results highlight the need for locality-based public health recommendations that account for rural and underserved areas and may inform future pandemic preparedness by identifying counties most in need of resources and education at various stages of the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"23 4","pages":"8373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to estimate the risk of severe COVID-19 among individuals residing in rural, medically underserved counties compared to those living in other counties.

Methods: Individual-level COVID-19 hospitalization and death data and demographic variables were downloaded from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme was used to classify urban and rural counties. Health Resources and Services Administration's medically underserved area (MUA) designation was used to identify underserved counties. County-level data were drawn from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Analytic samples included data from Minnesota and Montana in 2020. Urban-rural/MUA joint exposure categories were created: rural/MUA, rural/non-MUA, urban/MUA, urban/non-MUA. Hierarchical logistic regression models estimated associations (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI)) between rurality, MUA status, joint urban-rural/MUA status, and severe COVID-19, overall and stratified by age and state. Models were adjusted for individual- and county-level demographics.

Results: The odds of severe outcomes among those living in rural counties were 13% lower (95%CI: 0.83-0.91) than those in urban counties. The odds of severe outcomes among those living in MUA counties were 24% higher (95%CI: 1.18-1.30) than those in non-MUA counties. For joint exposure analyses, the odds of severe outcomes were highest among those living in urban/MUA counties compared to those in rural/non-MUA counties (adjusted odds ratio: 1.36, 95%CI: 1.27-1.44).

Conclusion: In 2020, the risk of severe COVID-19 was more pronounced in urban counties and underserved areas. Results highlight the need for locality-based public health recommendations that account for rural and underserved areas and may inform future pandemic preparedness by identifying counties most in need of resources and education at various stages of the pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2020年城乡状况和医疗服务不足地区居民的联合暴露与COVID-19严重后果的风险
前言:本研究的目的是估计居住在农村、医疗服务不足的县的个体与居住在其他县的个体相比患严重COVID-19的风险。方法:从美国疾病控制与预防中心下载个体COVID-19住院和死亡数据以及人口统计学变量。采用2013年国家卫生统计中心城乡分类方案对城乡县进行分类。卫生资源和服务管理局的医疗服务不足地区(MUA)指定用于确定服务不足的县。县级数据来自2015-2019年美国社区调查的5年估计。分析样本包括2020年明尼苏达州和蒙大拿州的数据。建立了城乡/MUA联合暴露类别:农村/MUA、农村/非MUA、城市/MUA、城市/非MUA。分层逻辑回归模型估计了农村状况、MUA状况、城乡/MUA联合状况与严重COVID-19之间的总体关联(优势比和95%置信区间(CI)),并按年龄和州分层。模型根据个人和县级人口统计数据进行了调整。结果:农村县发生严重后果的几率比城市县低13% (95%CI: 0.83-0.91)。生活在MUA县的患者发生严重后果的几率比非MUA县的患者高24% (95%CI: 1.18-1.30)。在联合暴露分析中,与农村/非MUA县相比,生活在城市/MUA县的人发生严重后果的几率最高(调整后的优势比:1.36,95%CI: 1.27-1.44)。结论:2020年,城市县和服务欠发达地区发生重症疫情的风险更为明显。研究结果强调需要针对农村和服务不足地区提出基于地区的公共卫生建议,并可能通过确定在大流行的各个阶段最需要资源和教育的县,为未来的大流行防备提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
期刊最新文献
'Imagine if we had an actual service ...': a qualitative exploration of abortion access challenges in Australian rural primary care. The Murtupuni Statement on rural generalist professional practice in Australia. Therapeutic resources used by traditional communities of the Brazilian Amazon: a scoping review. First Nations Peoples' perspectives on telehealth physiotherapy: a qualitative study focused on the therapeutic relationship. Social determinants and socioeconomic inequalities in adherence to antenatal iron-folic acid supplementation in urban and rural Indonesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1