Public healthcare personnel's experiences and opinions on access and readiness to provide mental health care in a remote rural area in South Africa.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Rural and remote health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-02 DOI:10.22605/RRH8961
Divan Rall, Leslie Swartz
{"title":"Public healthcare personnel's experiences and opinions on access and readiness to provide mental health care in a remote rural area in South Africa.","authors":"Divan Rall, Leslie Swartz","doi":"10.22605/RRH8961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>WHO encourages decentralising mental health care away from the tertiary locus of care into lower levels of care so as to reform mental healthcare worldwide. Recently, attempts have been made to facilitate the integration of public mental health care into general healthcare systems in South Africa. It is well established that the country's public healthcare system faces numerous multifaceted challenges - including very limited human, structural and material resources needed to accommodate and treat patients. We studied the experiences and opinions of public healthcare workers at primary healthcare clinics and the associated referral hospitals, focusing mainly on exploring their views on the ability and readiness for access to and provision of mental health to state health patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS), the Mental Illness: Clinicians' Attitudes Scale (MICA-4) and a purpose-made questionnaire were used for data collection. The data from the MAKS and MICA-4 were imported into IBM SPSS Statistics Software to yield descriptive information, and Spearman's rank correlations were performed between the measures. The purpose-made questionnaire produced descriptive quantitative data and qualitative data that were analysed through conventional content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from the MAKS suggest that participants experienced gaps in mental health knowledge and had fair levels of familiarity and ability to recognise different mental health conditions. Results from the MICA-4 suggest that participants in our study generally displayed a positive attitude towards people with mental illness and aspects involving psychiatry. Quantitative results from the purpose-made questionnaire describe aspects around mental health services, training, resources and care. Qualitative findings suggest healthcare workers wished for more mental-health-specific resources and contact with the healthcare system to facilitate interventions and care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research presents possible solutions to the challenges faced in public mental health care. Some of these solutions are within workers' control, while many of the solutions to the successful integration of more comprehensive basic care are out of their ambit of control, remaining locked up in policy and implementation rather than in field-level practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"25 1","pages":"8961"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural and remote health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH8961","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: WHO encourages decentralising mental health care away from the tertiary locus of care into lower levels of care so as to reform mental healthcare worldwide. Recently, attempts have been made to facilitate the integration of public mental health care into general healthcare systems in South Africa. It is well established that the country's public healthcare system faces numerous multifaceted challenges - including very limited human, structural and material resources needed to accommodate and treat patients. We studied the experiences and opinions of public healthcare workers at primary healthcare clinics and the associated referral hospitals, focusing mainly on exploring their views on the ability and readiness for access to and provision of mental health to state health patients.

Methods: The Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS), the Mental Illness: Clinicians' Attitudes Scale (MICA-4) and a purpose-made questionnaire were used for data collection. The data from the MAKS and MICA-4 were imported into IBM SPSS Statistics Software to yield descriptive information, and Spearman's rank correlations were performed between the measures. The purpose-made questionnaire produced descriptive quantitative data and qualitative data that were analysed through conventional content analysis.

Results: Results from the MAKS suggest that participants experienced gaps in mental health knowledge and had fair levels of familiarity and ability to recognise different mental health conditions. Results from the MICA-4 suggest that participants in our study generally displayed a positive attitude towards people with mental illness and aspects involving psychiatry. Quantitative results from the purpose-made questionnaire describe aspects around mental health services, training, resources and care. Qualitative findings suggest healthcare workers wished for more mental-health-specific resources and contact with the healthcare system to facilitate interventions and care.

Conclusion: This research presents possible solutions to the challenges faced in public mental health care. Some of these solutions are within workers' control, while many of the solutions to the successful integration of more comprehensive basic care are out of their ambit of control, remaining locked up in policy and implementation rather than in field-level practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rural and remote health
Rural and remote health Rural Health-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
145
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rural and Remote Health is a not-for-profit, online-only, peer-reviewed academic publication. It aims to further rural and remote health education, research and practice. The primary purpose of the Journal is to publish and so provide an international knowledge-base of peer-reviewed material from rural health practitioners (medical, nursing and allied health professionals and health workers), educators, researchers and policy makers.
期刊最新文献
Public healthcare personnel's experiences and opinions on access and readiness to provide mental health care in a remote rural area in South Africa. Critical analysis of interprofessional student-led community health promotion workshops. Profile and factors associated with low birth weight in Indonesia: a national data survey. Analysis of selected factors influencing mortality of patients with COVID-19 treated in a community hospital in a rural region of Poland. Innovative strategies to tackle healthcare disparities in rural and remote areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1