Recognising risk of neonatal encephalopathy with advancing gestation in nulliparous women is crucial for case review

Malcolm Battin, Lynn Sadler, Meghan Hill
{"title":"Recognising risk of neonatal encephalopathy with advancing gestation in nulliparous women is crucial for case review","authors":"Malcolm Battin, Lynn Sadler, Meghan Hill","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-326203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In neonatal encephalopathy (NE), establishing the history includes scrutiny of the perinatal events contributing to the infant’s condition. For births initially considered ‘low risk’ but resulting in peripartum hypoxia, it is crucial to perform interdisciplinary case review. The neonatal perspective (although retrospective) is valuable, but the denominator of healthy babies is not reviewed, only the injured, so hindsight bias should be recognised. Nevertheless, we must consider potential opportunities to act differently and mitigate, particularly if clear risk factors were underappreciated at the time. In Aotearoa New Zealand, the Perinatal and Maternal Mortality Review Committee (PMMRC) collects national data on NE.1 Annual reports include clinical and demographic factors, which facilitate case review to document contributing factors and potential preventability.2 The PMMRC report1 documents …","PeriodicalId":501153,"journal":{"name":"Fetal & Neonatal","volume":"469 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal & Neonatal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In neonatal encephalopathy (NE), establishing the history includes scrutiny of the perinatal events contributing to the infant’s condition. For births initially considered ‘low risk’ but resulting in peripartum hypoxia, it is crucial to perform interdisciplinary case review. The neonatal perspective (although retrospective) is valuable, but the denominator of healthy babies is not reviewed, only the injured, so hindsight bias should be recognised. Nevertheless, we must consider potential opportunities to act differently and mitigate, particularly if clear risk factors were underappreciated at the time. In Aotearoa New Zealand, the Perinatal and Maternal Mortality Review Committee (PMMRC) collects national data on NE.1 Annual reports include clinical and demographic factors, which facilitate case review to document contributing factors and potential preventability.2 The PMMRC report1 documents …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认识到新生儿脑病的风险与提前妊娠在未产妇女是至关重要的病例审查
在新生儿脑病(NE)中,建立病史包括检查导致婴儿病情的围产期事件。对于最初被认为是“低风险”但导致围产期缺氧的分娩,进行跨学科的病例回顾是至关重要的。新生儿的视角(虽然是回顾性的)是有价值的,但健康婴儿的分母没有被回顾,只有受伤的,所以后见之明的偏见应该得到承认。然而,我们必须考虑采取不同行动和减轻风险的潜在机会,特别是在当时没有充分认识到明显的风险因素的情况下。在新西兰奥特罗阿,围产期和孕产妇死亡率审查委员会(PMMRC)收集有关新生儿死亡率的国家数据1 .年度报告包括临床和人口因素,这有助于病例审查,以记录导致因素和潜在的预防措施PMMRC报告1文件…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of cord clamping on haemodynamic transition in term newborn infants Treatment courses and outcomes of oesophageal atresia in patients with trisomy 18: a case series of 271 patients from a nationwide database in Japan Building a better model: abandon kitchen sink regression Recognising risk of neonatal encephalopathy with advancing gestation in nulliparous women is crucial for case review Maternal treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during pregnancy and delayed neonatal adaptation: a population-based cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1