Treatment courses and outcomes of oesophageal atresia in patients with trisomy 18: a case series of 271 patients from a nationwide database in Japan

Mai Kutsukake, Takaaki Konishi, Michimasa Fujiogi, Naohiro Takamoto, Kaori Morita, Ikuta Yasuhisa, Yohei Hashimoto, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Jun Fujishiro, Hideo Yasunaga
{"title":"Treatment courses and outcomes of oesophageal atresia in patients with trisomy 18: a case series of 271 patients from a nationwide database in Japan","authors":"Mai Kutsukake, Takaaki Konishi, Michimasa Fujiogi, Naohiro Takamoto, Kaori Morita, Ikuta Yasuhisa, Yohei Hashimoto, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Jun Fujishiro, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-326354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To describe characteristics, treatments and clinical outcomes of patients with trisomy 18 and oesophageal atresia, using a nationwide database in Japan. Design Descriptive study using a retrospective cohort. Setting A nationwide inpatient database including 90% of hospitals with neonatal intensive care units in Japan. Patients Patients hospitalised within a day after birth for both oesophageal atresia and trisomy 18 between July 2010 and March 2020. Interventions Radical surgery for oesophageal atresia. Main outcome measures Characteristics, treatment course and outcomes. Results Among 271 patients with both oesophageal atresia and trisomy 18, 70 patients underwent radical surgery for oesophageal atresia. Patients who underwent radical surgery were less likely to have severe cardiac anomalies (17% vs 32%; p=0.020), but more likely to undergo cardiac surgery (21% vs 9.5%; p=0.012) than those who did not. The overall in-hospital mortality was lower (54% vs 79%; p<0.001) and the median age at death was higher (210 days vs 39 days; p<0.001) in patients who underwent radical surgery than the others. Postoperative mortality within 30 days after radical surgery was 5.7%. Patients who underwent radical surgery were likely to be discharged to home (50% vs 18%; p<0.001), whereas the age at home discharge (median 314 days vs 216 days; p=0.19) and the requirement for each home treatment did not differ significantly by radical surgery. Conclusion This study provides information that will aid the clinical decision-making process for patients with oesophageal atresia and trisomy 18. Radical surgery may be a safe and feasible treatment option. No data are available.","PeriodicalId":501153,"journal":{"name":"Fetal & Neonatal","volume":"267 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal & Neonatal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To describe characteristics, treatments and clinical outcomes of patients with trisomy 18 and oesophageal atresia, using a nationwide database in Japan. Design Descriptive study using a retrospective cohort. Setting A nationwide inpatient database including 90% of hospitals with neonatal intensive care units in Japan. Patients Patients hospitalised within a day after birth for both oesophageal atresia and trisomy 18 between July 2010 and March 2020. Interventions Radical surgery for oesophageal atresia. Main outcome measures Characteristics, treatment course and outcomes. Results Among 271 patients with both oesophageal atresia and trisomy 18, 70 patients underwent radical surgery for oesophageal atresia. Patients who underwent radical surgery were less likely to have severe cardiac anomalies (17% vs 32%; p=0.020), but more likely to undergo cardiac surgery (21% vs 9.5%; p=0.012) than those who did not. The overall in-hospital mortality was lower (54% vs 79%; p<0.001) and the median age at death was higher (210 days vs 39 days; p<0.001) in patients who underwent radical surgery than the others. Postoperative mortality within 30 days after radical surgery was 5.7%. Patients who underwent radical surgery were likely to be discharged to home (50% vs 18%; p<0.001), whereas the age at home discharge (median 314 days vs 216 days; p=0.19) and the requirement for each home treatment did not differ significantly by radical surgery. Conclusion This study provides information that will aid the clinical decision-making process for patients with oesophageal atresia and trisomy 18. Radical surgery may be a safe and feasible treatment option. No data are available.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
18 三体综合征患者食道闭锁的治疗过程和结果:日本全国数据库中 271 例患者的病例系列研究
目的 利用日本全国性数据库,描述 18 三体综合征合并食道闭锁患者的特征、治疗方法和临床结果。设计 采用回顾性队列进行描述性研究。背景 一个全国性的住院患者数据库,包括日本 90% 设有新生儿重症监护室的医院。患者 2010年7月至2020年3月期间,因食道闭锁和18三体综合征而在出生后一天内住院的患者。干预措施 食管闭锁根治手术。主要结果指标 特征、治疗过程和结果。结果 在271名同时患有食道闭锁和18三体综合征的患者中,70名患者接受了食道闭锁根治手术。与未接受根治手术的患者相比,接受根治手术的患者出现严重心脏畸形的几率较低(17% vs 32%;P=0.020),但接受心脏手术的几率更高(21% vs 9.5%;P=0.012)。与其他患者相比,接受根治性手术的患者院内总死亡率较低(54% vs 79%; p<0.001),中位死亡年龄较高(210天 vs 39天; p<0.001)。根治术后30天内的术后死亡率为5.7%。接受根治性手术的患者有可能出院回家(50% vs 18%; p<0.001),而出院回家的年龄(中位数314天 vs 216天; p=0.19)和每次回家治疗的要求并没有因根治性手术的不同而有显著差异。结论 本研究提供的信息有助于食道闭锁和 18 三体综合征患者的临床决策过程。根治性手术可能是一种安全可行的治疗方案。暂无数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of cord clamping on haemodynamic transition in term newborn infants Treatment courses and outcomes of oesophageal atresia in patients with trisomy 18: a case series of 271 patients from a nationwide database in Japan Building a better model: abandon kitchen sink regression Recognising risk of neonatal encephalopathy with advancing gestation in nulliparous women is crucial for case review Maternal treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during pregnancy and delayed neonatal adaptation: a population-based cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1