{"title":"Treatment courses and outcomes of oesophageal atresia in patients with trisomy 18: a case series of 271 patients from a nationwide database in Japan","authors":"Mai Kutsukake, Takaaki Konishi, Michimasa Fujiogi, Naohiro Takamoto, Kaori Morita, Ikuta Yasuhisa, Yohei Hashimoto, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Jun Fujishiro, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-326354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To describe characteristics, treatments and clinical outcomes of patients with trisomy 18 and oesophageal atresia, using a nationwide database in Japan. Design Descriptive study using a retrospective cohort. Setting A nationwide inpatient database including 90% of hospitals with neonatal intensive care units in Japan. Patients Patients hospitalised within a day after birth for both oesophageal atresia and trisomy 18 between July 2010 and March 2020. Interventions Radical surgery for oesophageal atresia. Main outcome measures Characteristics, treatment course and outcomes. Results Among 271 patients with both oesophageal atresia and trisomy 18, 70 patients underwent radical surgery for oesophageal atresia. Patients who underwent radical surgery were less likely to have severe cardiac anomalies (17% vs 32%; p=0.020), but more likely to undergo cardiac surgery (21% vs 9.5%; p=0.012) than those who did not. The overall in-hospital mortality was lower (54% vs 79%; p<0.001) and the median age at death was higher (210 days vs 39 days; p<0.001) in patients who underwent radical surgery than the others. Postoperative mortality within 30 days after radical surgery was 5.7%. Patients who underwent radical surgery were likely to be discharged to home (50% vs 18%; p<0.001), whereas the age at home discharge (median 314 days vs 216 days; p=0.19) and the requirement for each home treatment did not differ significantly by radical surgery. Conclusion This study provides information that will aid the clinical decision-making process for patients with oesophageal atresia and trisomy 18. Radical surgery may be a safe and feasible treatment option. No data are available.","PeriodicalId":501153,"journal":{"name":"Fetal & Neonatal","volume":"267 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal & Neonatal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective To describe characteristics, treatments and clinical outcomes of patients with trisomy 18 and oesophageal atresia, using a nationwide database in Japan. Design Descriptive study using a retrospective cohort. Setting A nationwide inpatient database including 90% of hospitals with neonatal intensive care units in Japan. Patients Patients hospitalised within a day after birth for both oesophageal atresia and trisomy 18 between July 2010 and March 2020. Interventions Radical surgery for oesophageal atresia. Main outcome measures Characteristics, treatment course and outcomes. Results Among 271 patients with both oesophageal atresia and trisomy 18, 70 patients underwent radical surgery for oesophageal atresia. Patients who underwent radical surgery were less likely to have severe cardiac anomalies (17% vs 32%; p=0.020), but more likely to undergo cardiac surgery (21% vs 9.5%; p=0.012) than those who did not. The overall in-hospital mortality was lower (54% vs 79%; p<0.001) and the median age at death was higher (210 days vs 39 days; p<0.001) in patients who underwent radical surgery than the others. Postoperative mortality within 30 days after radical surgery was 5.7%. Patients who underwent radical surgery were likely to be discharged to home (50% vs 18%; p<0.001), whereas the age at home discharge (median 314 days vs 216 days; p=0.19) and the requirement for each home treatment did not differ significantly by radical surgery. Conclusion This study provides information that will aid the clinical decision-making process for patients with oesophageal atresia and trisomy 18. Radical surgery may be a safe and feasible treatment option. No data are available.