The devil’s in the detail – counting unique and organic contract cheating sites targeting higher education students in the UAE as a call to delegitimize them

IF 3.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal for Educational Integrity Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1007/s40979-022-00114-z
Khan, Zeenath Reza
{"title":"The devil’s in the detail – counting unique and organic contract cheating sites targeting higher education students in the UAE as a call to delegitimize them","authors":"Khan, Zeenath Reza","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00114-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When considering a paradigm shift in higher education, it is imperative to focus on removing obstacles against maintaining integrity in academia. One such obstacle is contract cheating sites that have mushroomed disproportionately during the 18 months of emergency distance learning threatening graduate quality and university reputations (McKie, Essay mills targeting students as pandemic crisis shifts HE online, 2020). It was sharply brought to focus in 2015 due to a mass-scale scandal involving 16 universities and more than 1000 students leading to a subsequent law making such services illegal in Australia. Contract cheating is a mushrooming industry that is constantly targeting often unsuspecting students under the guise of legitimate help. Moreover, these services in turn began black mailing students after delivering services (Draper et al., Int J Educ Integr 17:13, 2021). It is therefore vital to explore the existence and number of such websites that target students in UAE, sometimes using university logos to show legitimacy to understand the extent of the problem. This is primarily because an accurate measure of the extent does not currently exist (Newton, Front Educ 3:67, 2018). Curtis et al. (Stud High Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1972093, 2021) have reported on self-reported cases from students which can be varied and often under-reported. This study is an attempt at using Boolean search technique to count unique and organic websites that have manifested. Coded analysis was used to collate the websites and count the total number of searches. For a total of 34 unique and organic websites, 29 showed a z score higher than the mean value 2.94, at standard deviation of 1.89, positing that the probability of appearance of these 29 websites across different search engines, different browsers and across separate search keywords was significant. This demonstrates the aggressive nature of these sites and their considerable efforts to offer a service that is harmful and detrimental to the students and education sector. This study is a milestone towards developing a nation-wide understanding of contract cheating in the UAE. It is also positioned as a proposal for higher education sustainability in the nation to look to ban services that offer to write assignments for students with or without a fee as a top-down approach to tackling the issue.","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"217 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00114-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When considering a paradigm shift in higher education, it is imperative to focus on removing obstacles against maintaining integrity in academia. One such obstacle is contract cheating sites that have mushroomed disproportionately during the 18 months of emergency distance learning threatening graduate quality and university reputations (McKie, Essay mills targeting students as pandemic crisis shifts HE online, 2020). It was sharply brought to focus in 2015 due to a mass-scale scandal involving 16 universities and more than 1000 students leading to a subsequent law making such services illegal in Australia. Contract cheating is a mushrooming industry that is constantly targeting often unsuspecting students under the guise of legitimate help. Moreover, these services in turn began black mailing students after delivering services (Draper et al., Int J Educ Integr 17:13, 2021). It is therefore vital to explore the existence and number of such websites that target students in UAE, sometimes using university logos to show legitimacy to understand the extent of the problem. This is primarily because an accurate measure of the extent does not currently exist (Newton, Front Educ 3:67, 2018). Curtis et al. (Stud High Educ. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1972093, 2021) have reported on self-reported cases from students which can be varied and often under-reported. This study is an attempt at using Boolean search technique to count unique and organic websites that have manifested. Coded analysis was used to collate the websites and count the total number of searches. For a total of 34 unique and organic websites, 29 showed a z score higher than the mean value 2.94, at standard deviation of 1.89, positing that the probability of appearance of these 29 websites across different search engines, different browsers and across separate search keywords was significant. This demonstrates the aggressive nature of these sites and their considerable efforts to offer a service that is harmful and detrimental to the students and education sector. This study is a milestone towards developing a nation-wide understanding of contract cheating in the UAE. It is also positioned as a proposal for higher education sustainability in the nation to look to ban services that offer to write assignments for students with or without a fee as a top-down approach to tackling the issue.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
细节中隐藏着魔鬼——把针对阿联酋高等教育学生的独特和有机的合同作弊网站计算在内,以此呼吁将其合法化
在考虑高等教育的范式转变时,必须把重点放在消除阻碍保持学术界诚信的障碍上。其中一个障碍是合同作弊网站,这些网站在18个月的紧急远程教育期间不成比例地迅速增长,威胁到研究生的质量和大学的声誉(McKie, Essay mills瞄准学生,因为流行病危机转移了HE online, 2020)。2015年,由于涉及16所大学和1000多名学生的大规模丑闻,澳大利亚随后通过了一项法律,将此类服务定为非法,这一丑闻成为人们关注的焦点。合同欺诈是一个迅速发展的行业,经常以合法帮助为幌子,针对毫无戒心的学生。此外,这些服务在提供服务后,反过来又开始向学生发送黑色邮件(Draper等人,Int J Educ integri 17:13, 2021)。因此,探索针对阿联酋学生的此类网站的存在和数量至关重要,有时使用大学标志来显示合法性,以了解问题的严重程度。这主要是因为目前还不存在对程度的准确测量(Newton, Front Educ 3:67, 2018)。柯蒂斯等人(Stud High education)。https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1972093, 2021)报告了学生自我报告的病例,这些病例可能各不相同,而且往往报告不足。这项研究是一个尝试使用布尔搜索技术来计算独特的和有机的网站已经表现。编码分析用于整理网站并计算总搜索次数。在34个独特和有机网站中,有29个网站的z得分高于平均值2.94,标准差为1.89,假设这29个网站在不同的搜索引擎、不同的浏览器和不同的搜索关键词中出现的概率是显著的。这表明了这些网站的侵略性,以及他们为提供对学生和教育部门有害和有害的服务所做的巨大努力。这项研究是发展阿联酋全国范围内对合同欺诈理解的一个里程碑。它还被定位为全国高等教育可持续发展的一项提案,旨在禁止为学生提供有偿或无偿的作业服务,作为一种自上而下的解决问题的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Educational Integrity
International Journal for Educational Integrity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
25
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clues to fostering a program culture of academic integrity: findings from a multidimensional regression model Expressions of gratitude in education: an analysis of the #ThankYourTeacher campaign Critical thinking, assessment, and educational policy in Palestinian universities Can you spot the bot? Identifying AI-generated writing in college essays Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived Ethics regarding the use of ChatGPT among generation Z university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1