首页 > 最新文献

International Journal for Educational Integrity最新文献

英文 中文
Clues to fostering a program culture of academic integrity: findings from a multidimensional regression model 培养学术诚信项目文化的线索:多维回归模型的发现
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-024-00163-6
Kelley A. Packalen, Kate Rowbotham
Using multivariate regression, we identified situational, personal and contextual variables correlated with business students’ self-reported rates of academic misconduct. The most influential predictors of increasing academic misconduct were: higher estimates of peers’ academic misconduct, increasingly negative perceptions of the program’s academic integrity culture, and rating questionable academic behaviours less seriously. Individual priorities, personal characteristics and social support were less influential. We then analyzed our quantitative results in light of our deep understanding of the broader context to derive richer insights from the interplay of our independent variables. Importantly, our results indicate that program-led proactive messaging designed to foster a culture of academic integrity can effectively buffer tendencies towards academic dishonesty. Absent ongoing messaging, however, increasing academic pressures may erode those initial benefits. Moreover, repercussions of major academic integrity breaches can be long lasting, suggesting an even greater need for fostering a culture of academic integrity a priori. Finally, we recommend a public health practice of identifying positive deviants – individuals who thrive in challenging environments – and then in an effort to change a peer support system that fosters academic misconduct into one that discourages it, engaging with those individuals to understand why and how they resist the status quo.
通过多元回归法,我们确定了与商科学生自我报告的学术不端行为率相关的情境、个人和环境变量。对学术不端行为增加最有影响的预测因素是:对同学学术不端行为的估计较高、对课程学术诚信文化的负面看法越来越多,以及对有问题的学术行为的评价不那么严肃。个人优先事项、个人特征和社会支持的影响较小。然后,我们根据对更广泛背景的深刻理解对量化结果进行了分析,以便从自变量的相互作用中获得更丰富的见解。重要的是,我们的研究结果表明,以项目为主导、旨在培养学术诚信文化的主动信息传递可以有效地缓冲学术不诚信的倾向。然而,如果缺乏持续的信息传递,不断增加的学术压力可能会侵蚀这些最初的益处。此外,重大学术诚信违规行为的影响可能会持续很长时间,这表明更有必要事先培养学术诚信文化。最后,我们建议采取一种公共卫生做法,即发现积极的偏差者--在具有挑战性的环境中茁壮成长的人--然后努力将助长学术不端行为的同伴支持系统转变为阻止学术不端行为的系统,与这些人接触,了解他们抵制现状的原因和方式。
{"title":"Clues to fostering a program culture of academic integrity: findings from a multidimensional regression model","authors":"Kelley A. Packalen, Kate Rowbotham","doi":"10.1007/s40979-024-00163-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00163-6","url":null,"abstract":"Using multivariate regression, we identified situational, personal and contextual variables correlated with business students’ self-reported rates of academic misconduct. The most influential predictors of increasing academic misconduct were: higher estimates of peers’ academic misconduct, increasingly negative perceptions of the program’s academic integrity culture, and rating questionable academic behaviours less seriously. Individual priorities, personal characteristics and social support were less influential. We then analyzed our quantitative results in light of our deep understanding of the broader context to derive richer insights from the interplay of our independent variables. Importantly, our results indicate that program-led proactive messaging designed to foster a culture of academic integrity can effectively buffer tendencies towards academic dishonesty. Absent ongoing messaging, however, increasing academic pressures may erode those initial benefits. Moreover, repercussions of major academic integrity breaches can be long lasting, suggesting an even greater need for fostering a culture of academic integrity a priori. Finally, we recommend a public health practice of identifying positive deviants – individuals who thrive in challenging environments – and then in an effort to change a peer support system that fosters academic misconduct into one that discourages it, engaging with those individuals to understand why and how they resist the status quo.","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142198677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Expressions of gratitude in education: an analysis of the #ThankYourTeacher campaign 教育中的感恩表达:对 #ThankYourTeacher 活动的分析
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-024-00159-2
Kelly-Ann Allen, Christine Grove, Fiona S. May, Nicholas Gamble, Rhoda Lai, James M. Saunders

Teachers play a significant societal role, yet many feel underappreciated, and commonly cite this as a reason for considering leaving the profession. This study investigated responses to the #ThankYourTeacher social media campaign, which was created to generate public expressions of gratitude towards teachers. Data were collected from Twitter, Instagram, a campaign website, and public events and thematically analysed. Orr’s (1992) Head, Heart, and Hands Model of Transformational Learning was used as a framework for understanding the qualities of teachers and their teaching that participants appreciated. Notably, more individuals expressed gratitude for teachers’ motivational and compassionate qualities (Heart) and their enthusiasm and leadership (Hands) than for their subject knowledge (Head). These findings underscore the importance of the teacher-student relationship and relational qualities over subject expertise. This study also highlights the potential for further research into the impacts of practicing gratitude towards teachers and increasing teachers’ sense of being valued and appreciated.

教师在社会中发挥着重要作用,但许多人认为自己未得到充分重视,并普遍将此作为考虑离开教师职业的一个原因。本研究调查了人们对 #ThankYourTeacher 社交媒体活动的反应,该活动旨在让公众表达对教师的感激之情。数据收集自 Twitter、Instagram、活动网站和公共活动,并进行了主题分析。奥尔(1992 年)的 "头脑、心灵和双手 "转型学习模型被用作理解参与者所感激的教师及其教学品质的框架。值得注意的是,与教师的学科知识(头脑)相比,更多的人对教师的激励性和同情心(心)以及教师的热情和领导力(手)表示感激。这些发现强调了师生关系和人际关系品质的重要性,而不是学科知识。本研究还强调了进一步研究对教师表达感激之情和增强教师被重视和被欣赏感的潜力。
{"title":"Expressions of gratitude in education: an analysis of the #ThankYourTeacher campaign","authors":"Kelly-Ann Allen, Christine Grove, Fiona S. May, Nicholas Gamble, Rhoda Lai, James M. Saunders","doi":"10.1007/s40979-024-00159-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00159-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Teachers play a significant societal role, yet many feel underappreciated, and commonly cite this as a reason for considering leaving the profession. This study investigated responses to the #ThankYourTeacher social media campaign, which was created to generate public expressions of gratitude towards teachers. Data were collected from Twitter, Instagram, a campaign website, and public events and thematically analysed. Orr’s (1992) Head, Heart, and Hands Model of Transformational Learning was used as a framework for understanding the qualities of teachers and their teaching that participants appreciated. Notably, more individuals expressed gratitude for teachers’ motivational and compassionate qualities (Heart) and their enthusiasm and leadership (Hands) than for their subject knowledge (Head). These findings underscore the importance of the teacher-student relationship and relational qualities over subject expertise. This study also highlights the potential for further research into the impacts of practicing gratitude towards teachers and increasing teachers’ sense of being valued and appreciated.</p>","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142198678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Critical thinking, assessment, and educational policy in Palestinian universities 巴勒斯坦大学的批判性思维、评估和教育政策
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-024-00160-9
Oqab Jabali, Bilal Hamamra, Ahmad Ayyoub
This study examines the relationship between critical thinking and grades at the tertiary level, focusing on their social, political, and ethical implications. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this study combines survey data collection with in-depth interviews to generate comprehensive insights into the complex relationship between critical thinking and grades. The survey targets 173 faculty members, while the interviews focus on seven selected academic staff members from Palestinian universities, enabling a comprehensive understanding of the research objectives. Results showed that grades often hinder critical thinking skills and creativity, leading to rote memorization and limited creativity. The study also highlights the political implications of grades, as standardized testing influences education policies and curriculum decisions. Faculty members expressed criticism of the prioritization of grades, citing conventional evaluation methods, temporal limitations, and resource constraints. As critical thinking is crucial for comprehensive student development, contributing to problem-solving, decision-making, creativity, innovation, effective communication, and active citizenship, the study proposes diverse approaches to strike a balance between valuing grades and nurturing critical thinking abilities. By fostering critical thinking abilities, Palestinian students can enhance their preparedness for academic pursuits, personal growth, and societal contributions.
本研究探讨了批判性思维与高等教育成绩之间的关系,重点关注其社会、政治和伦理影响。本研究采用混合方法,将调查数据收集与深入访谈相结合,以全面了解批判性思维与成绩之间的复杂关系。调查对象为 173 名教职员工,而访谈的重点则是巴勒斯坦各大学选定的七名教职员工,从而全面了解研究目标。结果表明,成绩往往会阻碍批判性思维能力和创造力,导致死记硬背和创造力受限。研究还强调了成绩的政治影响,因为标准化考试影响着教育政策和课程决策。教职员工以传统评价方法、时间限制和资源制约为由,对分数优先表示了批评。由于批判性思维对学生的全面发展至关重要,有助于解决问题、决策、创造力、创新、有效沟通和积极的公民意识,因此本研究提出了多种方法,以在重视成绩和培养批判性思维能力之间取得平衡。通过培养批判性思维能力,巴勒斯坦学生可以为学术追求、个人成长和社会贡献做好更充分的准备。
{"title":"Critical thinking, assessment, and educational policy in Palestinian universities","authors":"Oqab Jabali, Bilal Hamamra, Ahmad Ayyoub","doi":"10.1007/s40979-024-00160-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00160-9","url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the relationship between critical thinking and grades at the tertiary level, focusing on their social, political, and ethical implications. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this study combines survey data collection with in-depth interviews to generate comprehensive insights into the complex relationship between critical thinking and grades. The survey targets 173 faculty members, while the interviews focus on seven selected academic staff members from Palestinian universities, enabling a comprehensive understanding of the research objectives. Results showed that grades often hinder critical thinking skills and creativity, leading to rote memorization and limited creativity. The study also highlights the political implications of grades, as standardized testing influences education policies and curriculum decisions. Faculty members expressed criticism of the prioritization of grades, citing conventional evaluation methods, temporal limitations, and resource constraints. As critical thinking is crucial for comprehensive student development, contributing to problem-solving, decision-making, creativity, innovation, effective communication, and active citizenship, the study proposes diverse approaches to strike a balance between valuing grades and nurturing critical thinking abilities. By fostering critical thinking abilities, Palestinian students can enhance their preparedness for academic pursuits, personal growth, and societal contributions.","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141969769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can you spot the bot? Identifying AI-generated writing in college essays 你能识别机器人吗?识别大学论文中的人工智能生成写作
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-024-00158-3
Tal Waltzer, Celeste Pilegard, Gail D. Heyman

The release of ChatGPT in 2022 has generated extensive speculation about how Artificial Intelligence (AI) will impact the capacity of institutions for higher learning to achieve their central missions of promoting learning and certifying knowledge. Our main questions were whether people could identify AI-generated text and whether factors such as expertise or confidence would predict this ability. The present research provides empirical data to inform these speculations through an assessment given to a convenience sample of 140 college instructors and 145 college students (Study 1) as well as to ChatGPT itself (Study 2). The assessment was administered in an online survey and included an AI Identification Test which presented pairs of essays: In each case, one was written by a college student during an in-class exam and the other was generated by ChatGPT. Analyses with binomial tests and linear modeling suggested that the AI Identification Test was challenging: On average, instructors were able to guess which one was written by ChatGPT only 70% of the time (compared to 60% for students and 63% for ChatGPT). Neither experience with ChatGPT nor content expertise improved performance. Even people who were confident in their abilities struggled with the test. ChatGPT responses reflected much more confidence than human participants despite performing just as poorly. ChatGPT responses on an AI Attitude Assessment measure were similar to those reported by instructors and students except that ChatGPT rated several AI uses more favorably and indicated substantially more optimism about the positive educational benefits of AI. The findings highlight challenges for scholars and practitioners to consider as they navigate the integration of AI in education.

2022 年发布的 ChatGPT 引发了人们对人工智能(AI)将如何影响高等院校实现其促进学习和认证知识这一核心使命的广泛猜测。我们的主要问题是,人们能否识别人工智能生成的文本,以及专业知识或信心等因素能否预测这种能力。本研究通过对 140 名大学教师和 145 名大学生(研究 1)以及 ChatGPT 本身(研究 2)的方便抽样进行评估,为这些推测提供了实证数据。评估以在线调查的形式进行,其中包括人工智能识别测试,该测试提供了两对文章:每对文章中,一篇由大学生在课堂考试中撰写,另一篇由 ChatGPT 生成。二项检验和线性建模分析表明,人工智能识别测试具有挑战性:平均而言,教师只有 70% 的时间能猜出哪个是由 ChatGPT 编写的(学生为 60%,ChatGPT 为 63%)。无论是使用 ChatGPT 的经验还是内容方面的专业知识,都无法提高成绩。即使是对自己的能力有信心的人也很难通过测试。尽管表现同样糟糕,但 ChatGPT 的回答却比人类参与者更有信心。ChatGPT 对人工智能态度评估的回答与教师和学生的报告相似,但 ChatGPT 对几种人工智能的使用给予了更高的评价,并对人工智能的积极教育效益表示出了更乐观的态度。研究结果凸显了学者和从业人员在将人工智能融入教育时需要考虑的挑战。
{"title":"Can you spot the bot? Identifying AI-generated writing in college essays","authors":"Tal Waltzer, Celeste Pilegard, Gail D. Heyman","doi":"10.1007/s40979-024-00158-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00158-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The release of ChatGPT in 2022 has generated extensive speculation about how Artificial Intelligence (AI) will impact the capacity of institutions for higher learning to achieve their central missions of promoting learning and certifying knowledge. Our main questions were whether people could identify AI-generated text and whether factors such as expertise or confidence would predict this ability. The present research provides empirical data to inform these speculations through an assessment given to a convenience sample of 140 college instructors and 145 college students (Study 1) as well as to ChatGPT itself (Study 2). The assessment was administered in an online survey and included an AI Identification Test which presented pairs of essays: In each case, one was written by a college student during an in-class exam and the other was generated by ChatGPT. Analyses with binomial tests and linear modeling suggested that the AI Identification Test was challenging: On average, instructors were able to guess which one was written by ChatGPT only 70% of the time (compared to 60% for students and 63% for ChatGPT). Neither experience with ChatGPT nor content expertise improved performance. Even people who were confident in their abilities struggled with the test. ChatGPT responses reflected much more confidence than human participants despite performing just as poorly. ChatGPT responses on an AI Attitude Assessment measure were similar to those reported by instructors and students except that ChatGPT rated several AI uses more favorably and indicated substantially more optimism about the positive educational benefits of AI. The findings highlight challenges for scholars and practitioners to consider as they navigate the integration of AI in education.</p>","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141574478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived Ethics regarding the use of ChatGPT among generation Z university students Z 世代大学生对使用 ChatGPT 的认知、态度和感知道德规范
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-024-00157-4
Benicio Gonzalo Acosta-Enriquez, Marco Agustín Arbulú Ballesteros, Carmen Graciela Arbulu Perez Vargas, Milca Naara Orellana Ulloa, Cristian Raymound Gutiérrez Ulloa, Johanna Micaela Pizarro Romero, Néstor Daniel Gutiérrez Jaramillo, Héctor Ulises Cuenca Orellana, Diego Xavier Ayala Anzoátegui, Carlos López Roca
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been integrated into higher education (HE), offering numerous benefits and transforming teaching and learning. Since its launch, ChatGPT has become the most popular learning model among Generation Z college students in HE. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, concerns, attitudes, and ethics of using ChatGPT among Generation Z college students in HE in Peru. An online survey was administered to 201 HE students with prior experience using the ChatGPT for academic activities. Two of the six proposed hypotheses were confirmed: Perceived Ethics (B = 0.856) and Student Concerns (B = 0.802). The findings suggest that HE students’ knowledge and positive attitudes toward ChatGPT do not guarantee its effective adoption and use. It is important to investigate how attitudes of optimism, skepticism, or apathy toward AI develop and how these attitudes influence the intention to use technologies such as the ChatGPT in HE settings. The dependence on ChatGPT raises ethical concerns that must be addressed with responsible use programs in HE. No sex or age differences were found in the relationship between the use of ChatGPTs and perceived ethics among HE students. However, further studies with diverse HE samples are needed to determine this relationship. To promote the ethical use of the ChatGPT in HE, institutions must develop comprehensive training programs, guidelines, and policies that address issues such as academic integrity, privacy, and misinformation. These initiatives should aim to educate students and university teachers on the responsible use of ChatGPT and other AI-based tools, fostering a culture of ethical adoption of AI to leverage its benefits and mitigate its potential risks, such as a lack of academic integrity.
人工智能(AI)已融入高等教育(HE),为教学带来了诸多益处和变革。自推出以来,ChatGPT 已成为最受高校 Z 世代大学生欢迎的学习模式。本研究旨在评估秘鲁高校 Z 世代大学生使用 ChatGPT 的知识、关注点、态度和道德规范。我们对 201 名曾在学术活动中使用过 ChatGPT 的高校学生进行了在线调查。在提出的六个假设中,有两个得到了证实:道德认知(B = 0.856)和学生关注(B = 0.802)。研究结果表明,高校学生对 ChatGPT 的了解和积极态度并不能保证其被有效采纳和使用。重要的是要研究对人工智能的乐观、怀疑或冷漠态度是如何形成的,以及这些态度如何影响在高校环境中使用 ChatGPT 等技术的意愿。对 ChatGPT 的依赖引发了伦理方面的担忧,必须通过在高校开展负责任的使用计划来解决这些问题。在使用 ChatGPT 与高校学生的道德认知之间,没有发现性别或年龄差异。不过,要确定这种关系,还需要对不同的高校样本进行进一步研究。为了促进高校以合乎道德的方式使用 ChatGPT,各院校必须制定全面的培训计划、指导方针和政策,以解决学术诚信、隐私和错误信息等问题。这些举措应旨在教育学生和大学教师负责任地使用 ChatGPT 和其他基于人工智能的工具,培养一种合乎道德地采用人工智能的文化,以充分利用其优势并降低其潜在风险,如缺乏学术诚信。
{"title":"Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived Ethics regarding the use of ChatGPT among generation Z university students","authors":"Benicio Gonzalo Acosta-Enriquez, Marco Agustín Arbulú Ballesteros, Carmen Graciela Arbulu Perez Vargas, Milca Naara Orellana Ulloa, Cristian Raymound Gutiérrez Ulloa, Johanna Micaela Pizarro Romero, Néstor Daniel Gutiérrez Jaramillo, Héctor Ulises Cuenca Orellana, Diego Xavier Ayala Anzoátegui, Carlos López Roca","doi":"10.1007/s40979-024-00157-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00157-4","url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) has been integrated into higher education (HE), offering numerous benefits and transforming teaching and learning. Since its launch, ChatGPT has become the most popular learning model among Generation Z college students in HE. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, concerns, attitudes, and ethics of using ChatGPT among Generation Z college students in HE in Peru. An online survey was administered to 201 HE students with prior experience using the ChatGPT for academic activities. Two of the six proposed hypotheses were confirmed: Perceived Ethics (B = 0.856) and Student Concerns (B = 0.802). The findings suggest that HE students’ knowledge and positive attitudes toward ChatGPT do not guarantee its effective adoption and use. It is important to investigate how attitudes of optimism, skepticism, or apathy toward AI develop and how these attitudes influence the intention to use technologies such as the ChatGPT in HE settings. The dependence on ChatGPT raises ethical concerns that must be addressed with responsible use programs in HE. No sex or age differences were found in the relationship between the use of ChatGPTs and perceived ethics among HE students. However, further studies with diverse HE samples are needed to determine this relationship. To promote the ethical use of the ChatGPT in HE, institutions must develop comprehensive training programs, guidelines, and policies that address issues such as academic integrity, privacy, and misinformation. These initiatives should aim to educate students and university teachers on the responsible use of ChatGPT and other AI-based tools, fostering a culture of ethical adoption of AI to leverage its benefits and mitigate its potential risks, such as a lack of academic integrity.","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141505004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integrity games: an online teaching tool on academic integrity for undergraduate students 诚信游戏:面向本科生的学术诚信在线教学工具
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-024-00154-7
Mads Paludan Goddiksen, Aurélien Allard, Anna Catharina Vieira Armond, Christine Clavien, Hillar Loor, Céline Schöpfer, Orsolya Varga, Mikkel Willum Johansen
In this paper, we introduce Integrity Games ( https://integgame.eu/ ) – a freely available, gamified online teaching tool on academic integrity. In addition, we present results from a randomized controlled experiment measuring the learning outcomes from playing Integrity Games. Integrity Games engages students in reflections on realistic and relevant academic integrity issues that lie in the grey zone between good practice and misconduct. Thereby, it aims to 1) motivate students to learn more about academic integrity, 2) increase their awareness of the grey-zone issues, and 3) increase their awareness of misconduct. To achieve these aims, the tool presents four gamified cases that lead students through an engaging narrative. The experiment to measure learning outcomes was conducted in three European countries, and included N = 257 participants from across natural science, social science and the humanities. We show that the participants enjoyed playing Integrity Games, and that it increased their sensitivity to grey-zone issues and misconduct. However, the increases identified were similar to those achieved by the participants in the control group reading a non-gamified text. We end by discussing the value of gamification in online academic integrity training in light of these results.
在本文中,我们介绍了Integrity Games( https://integgame.eu/ )--一种关于学术诚信的免费游戏化在线教学工具。此外,我们还介绍了一项随机对照实验的结果,该实验测量了玩 "正直游戏 "的学习效果。正直游戏 "让学生参与到对现实和相关学术正直问题的思考中,这些问题处于良好实践和不端行为之间的灰色地带。因此,它旨在:1)激励学生学习更多有关学术诚信的知识;2)提高他们对灰色地带问题的认识;3)提高他们对不端行为的认识。为了实现这些目标,该工具提供了四个游戏化案例,引导学生进行引人入胜的讲述。衡量学习成果的实验在三个欧洲国家进行,共有来自自然科学、社会科学和人文科学领域的 257 人参加。我们的研究表明,参与者喜欢玩 "正直游戏",游戏提高了他们对灰色地带问题和不当行为的敏感度。然而,所发现的提高与对照组参与者在阅读非游戏化文本时所获得的提高相似。最后,我们根据这些结果讨论了游戏化在在线学术诚信培训中的价值。
{"title":"Integrity games: an online teaching tool on academic integrity for undergraduate students","authors":"Mads Paludan Goddiksen, Aurélien Allard, Anna Catharina Vieira Armond, Christine Clavien, Hillar Loor, Céline Schöpfer, Orsolya Varga, Mikkel Willum Johansen","doi":"10.1007/s40979-024-00154-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00154-7","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we introduce Integrity Games ( https://integgame.eu/ ) – a freely available, gamified online teaching tool on academic integrity. In addition, we present results from a randomized controlled experiment measuring the learning outcomes from playing Integrity Games. Integrity Games engages students in reflections on realistic and relevant academic integrity issues that lie in the grey zone between good practice and misconduct. Thereby, it aims to 1) motivate students to learn more about academic integrity, 2) increase their awareness of the grey-zone issues, and 3) increase their awareness of misconduct. To achieve these aims, the tool presents four gamified cases that lead students through an engaging narrative. The experiment to measure learning outcomes was conducted in three European countries, and included N = 257 participants from across natural science, social science and the humanities. We show that the participants enjoyed playing Integrity Games, and that it increased their sensitivity to grey-zone issues and misconduct. However, the increases identified were similar to those achieved by the participants in the control group reading a non-gamified text. We end by discussing the value of gamification in online academic integrity training in light of these results.","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140835482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
To behave or not (un)ethically? The meditative effect of mindfulness on statistics anxiety and academic dishonesty moderated by risk aversion 做人还是不做人?正念对统计焦虑和学术不诚实的冥想效应受风险规避的调节
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-024-00151-w
Yovav Eshet, Keren Grinautsky, Pnina Steinberger

Despite the growing interest in mindfulness in higher education, the literature on its relation to decision-making under risk (i.e. academic misconduct) and statistics anxiety is scarce. The present research shall fill this gap. Based on the prospect theory, we assessed the mediating effect of mindfulness on the relationship between statistics anxiety and academic dishonesty moderated by risk aversion. Data were collected from 791 undergraduate students in six Israeli academic institutions studying for bachelor’s degrees in social sciences. Questionnaires included the following measures: risk behaviour according to the prospect theory framework, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, Statistics Anxiety Rating Scale, Academic Misconduct Scale and sociodemographic variables. Correlations among these variables were explored. The data was analysed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). The results indicate that the variance in academic dishonesty is explained by students' statistics anxiety with a mediation of Mindfulness moderated by Risk Aversion. Mindfulness negatively affects Academic Dishonesty, while Risk Aversion has a significant positive effect on Mindfulness. Finally, among individuals with high statistics anxiety, Risk Averse individuals show significantly higher Mindfulness than Risk Seekers. We conclude that mindfulness-based interventions might be a constructive tool to reduce risk-taking and promote ethical decision-making among individuals who experience high levels of statistics anxiety. Furthermore, developing mindful skills may help individuals with higher anxiety levels neutralize these unwanted feelings and get along with their learning tasks. Hence, avoid academic unethical behaviours.

尽管人们对高等教育中的正念越来越感兴趣,但有关正念与风险决策(即学术不端行为)和统计焦虑之间关系的文献却很少。本研究将填补这一空白。基于前景理论,我们评估了正念对统计焦虑和学术不诚实之间关系的中介效应,并用风险规避进行了调节。数据收集自以色列六所学术机构的 791 名攻读社会科学学士学位的本科生。调查问卷包括以下内容:前景理论框架下的风险行为、正念注意意识量表、统计焦虑评分量表、学术不端行为量表和社会人口变量。对这些变量之间的相关性进行了探讨。数据采用结构方程模型(SEM)进行分析。结果表明,学生的统计焦虑解释了学术不诚实的变异,而正念则通过风险厌恶进行调节。正念对学术不诚实有负面影响,而风险厌恶对正念有显著的正面影响。最后,在高度统计焦虑的个体中,风险厌恶者的正念水平明显高于风险寻求者。我们的结论是,基于正念的干预措施可能是一种建设性的工具,可以减少高度统计焦虑者的冒险行为,促进道德决策。此外,培养正念技能可以帮助焦虑水平较高的人中和这些不必要的情绪,并顺利完成学习任务。从而避免学术不道德行为。
{"title":"To behave or not (un)ethically? The meditative effect of mindfulness on statistics anxiety and academic dishonesty moderated by risk aversion","authors":"Yovav Eshet, Keren Grinautsky, Pnina Steinberger","doi":"10.1007/s40979-024-00151-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00151-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite the growing interest in mindfulness in higher education, the literature on its relation to decision-making under risk (i.e. academic misconduct) and statistics anxiety is scarce. The present research shall fill this gap. Based on the prospect theory, we assessed the mediating effect of mindfulness on the relationship between statistics anxiety and academic dishonesty moderated by risk aversion. Data were collected from 791 undergraduate students in six Israeli academic institutions studying for bachelor’s degrees in social sciences. Questionnaires included the following measures: risk behaviour according to the prospect theory framework, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, Statistics Anxiety Rating Scale, Academic Misconduct Scale and sociodemographic variables. Correlations among these variables were explored. The data was analysed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). The results indicate that the variance in academic dishonesty is explained by students' statistics anxiety with a mediation of Mindfulness moderated by Risk Aversion. Mindfulness negatively affects Academic Dishonesty, while Risk Aversion has a significant positive effect on Mindfulness. Finally, among individuals with high statistics anxiety, Risk Averse individuals show significantly higher Mindfulness than Risk Seekers. We conclude that mindfulness-based interventions might be a constructive tool to reduce risk-taking and promote ethical decision-making among individuals who experience high levels of statistics anxiety. Furthermore, developing mindful skills may help individuals with higher anxiety levels neutralize these unwanted feelings and get along with their learning tasks. Hence, avoid academic unethical behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140615564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Academic integrity graphic novel mini-cases 学术诚信图画小说小案例
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-024-00152-9
Sarah Fischbach
Academic integrity is a crucial aspect of the educational process, often receiving insufficient attention until a violation occurs. Researchers emphasize the importance of students comprehending academic integrity to foster ethical professionalism. However, there is a lack of resources available to effectively support these conversations. This study aims to assess academic integrity efficacy and the multi-dimensional ethical scale (MES) through the use of a graphic novel mini-case study. The analysis reveals a significant relationship between academic integrity efficacy, MES dimensions (moral equity, relativism and contractualism), and the case studies among undergraduate participants. The combination of quantitative and qualitative findings provides valuable insights into how graphic novel mini-cases can engage in academic integrity discussions with undergraduate students. The graphic novel mini-cases, along with their limitations and potential for future research, are provided.
学术诚信是教育过程中的一个重要方面,但在发生违规行为之前,往往得不到足够的重视。研究人员强调了学生理解学术诚信对培养职业道德的重要性。然而,目前缺乏有效支持这些对话的资源。本研究旨在通过使用图画小说微型案例研究来评估学术诚信效能和多维道德量表(MES)。分析表明,学术诚信效能、MES 维度(道德公平、相对主义和契约主义)与本科生参与者的案例研究之间存在重要关系。定量和定性研究结果的结合为图画小说微型案例如何与本科生开展学术诚信讨论提供了宝贵的见解。本报告还介绍了微型案例图解及其局限性和未来研究的潜力。
{"title":"Academic integrity graphic novel mini-cases","authors":"Sarah Fischbach","doi":"10.1007/s40979-024-00152-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00152-9","url":null,"abstract":"Academic integrity is a crucial aspect of the educational process, often receiving insufficient attention until a violation occurs. Researchers emphasize the importance of students comprehending academic integrity to foster ethical professionalism. However, there is a lack of resources available to effectively support these conversations. This study aims to assess academic integrity efficacy and the multi-dimensional ethical scale (MES) through the use of a graphic novel mini-case study. The analysis reveals a significant relationship between academic integrity efficacy, MES dimensions (moral equity, relativism and contractualism), and the case studies among undergraduate participants. The combination of quantitative and qualitative findings provides valuable insights into how graphic novel mini-cases can engage in academic integrity discussions with undergraduate students. The graphic novel mini-cases, along with their limitations and potential for future research, are provided.","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140574754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Algorithmically-driven writing and academic integrity: exploring educators' practices, perceptions, and policies in AI era 算法驱动的写作与学术诚信:探索人工智能时代教育工作者的实践、认知和政策
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-03-20 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-024-00153-8
Leah Gustilo, Ethel Ong, Minie Rose Lapinid
Despite global interest in the interface of Algorithmically-driven writing tools (ADWTs) and academic integrity, empirical data considering educators' perspectives on the challenges, benefits, and policies of ADWTs use remain scarce. This study responds to calls for empirical investigation concerning the affordances and encumbrances of ADWTs, and their implications for academic integrity. Using a cross-sectional survey research design, we recruited through snowball sampling 100 graduate students and faculty members representing ten disciplines. Participants completed an online survey on perceptions, practices, and policies in the utilization of ADWTs in education. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) helped us understand the factors influencing the acceptance and use of ADWTs. The study found that teacher respondents highly value the diverse ways ADWTs can support their educational goals (perceived usefulness). However, they must overcome their barrier threshold such as limited access to these tools (perception of external control), a perceived lack of knowledge on their use (computer self-efficacy), and concerns about ADWTs' impact on academic integrity, creativity, and more (output quality). AI technologies are making headway in more educational institutions because of their proven and potential benefits for teaching, learning, assessment, and research. However, AI in education, particularly ADWTs, demands critical awareness of ethical protocols and entails collaboration and empowerment of all stakeholders by introducing innovations that showcase human intelligence over AI or partnership with AI.
尽管全球都在关注算法驱动写作工具(ADWTs)与学术诚信之间的关系,但考虑到教育工作者对使用ADWTs的挑战、益处和政策的看法的实证数据仍然很少。本研究响应了关于对 ADWT 的承受能力和负担及其对学术诚信的影响进行实证调查的呼吁。我们采用横断面调查研究设计,通过滚雪球式抽样,招募了代表十个学科的 100 名研究生和教师。参与者完成了一项在线调查,内容涉及在教育中使用自动化数据采集工具的看法、实践和政策。技术接受模型(TAM)帮助我们了解了影响接受和使用 ADWT 的因素。研究发现,受访教师高度评价自动化数据和通信技术能以多种方式支持他们的教育目标(感知有用性)。然而,他们必须克服自己的障碍门槛,如使用这些工具的机会有限(外部控制感)、缺乏使用这些工具的知识(计算机自我效能感),以及担心 ADWT 对学术诚信、创造力等的影响(输出质量)。由于人工智能技术在教学、学习、评估和研究方面已被证实并具有潜在优势,因此越来越多的教育机构开始采用人工智能技术。然而,人工智能在教育领域的应用,特别是自动化数据处理技术,需要对伦理协议有严格的认识,并需要所有利益相关者的合作与赋权,引入创新技术,展示人类智能优于人工智能或与人工智能的伙伴关系。
{"title":"Algorithmically-driven writing and academic integrity: exploring educators' practices, perceptions, and policies in AI era","authors":"Leah Gustilo, Ethel Ong, Minie Rose Lapinid","doi":"10.1007/s40979-024-00153-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00153-8","url":null,"abstract":"Despite global interest in the interface of Algorithmically-driven writing tools (ADWTs) and academic integrity, empirical data considering educators' perspectives on the challenges, benefits, and policies of ADWTs use remain scarce. This study responds to calls for empirical investigation concerning the affordances and encumbrances of ADWTs, and their implications for academic integrity. Using a cross-sectional survey research design, we recruited through snowball sampling 100 graduate students and faculty members representing ten disciplines. Participants completed an online survey on perceptions, practices, and policies in the utilization of ADWTs in education. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) helped us understand the factors influencing the acceptance and use of ADWTs. The study found that teacher respondents highly value the diverse ways ADWTs can support their educational goals (perceived usefulness). However, they must overcome their barrier threshold such as limited access to these tools (perception of external control), a perceived lack of knowledge on their use (computer self-efficacy), and concerns about ADWTs' impact on academic integrity, creativity, and more (output quality). AI technologies are making headway in more educational institutions because of their proven and potential benefits for teaching, learning, assessment, and research. However, AI in education, particularly ADWTs, demands critical awareness of ethical protocols and entails collaboration and empowerment of all stakeholders by introducing innovations that showcase human intelligence over AI or partnership with AI.","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140166167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education 学生对在高等教育中使用生成式人工智能技术的看法
IF 4.6 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-02-08 DOI: 10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4
Heather Johnston, Rebecca F. Wells, Elizabeth M. Shanks, Timothy Boey, Bryony N. Parsons

The aim of this project was to understand student perspectives on generative artificial intelligence (GAI) technologies such as Chat generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), in order to inform changes to the University of Liverpool Academic Integrity code of practice. The survey for this study was created by a library student team and vetted through focus groups. A total of 2555 students participated in the survey. Results showed that only 7% of students who responded had not heard of any GAI technologies, whilst over half had used or considered using these for academic purposes. The majority of students (54.1%) were supportive or somewhat supportive of using tools such as Grammarly, but 70.4% were unsupportive or somewhat unsupportive towards students using tools such as ChatGPT to write their whole essay. Students who had higher levels of confidence in their academic writing were less likely to use or consider using them for academic purposes, and were also less likely to be supportive of other students using them. Most students (41.1%) also thought there should be a university wide policy on when these technologies are or are not appropriate to use. The results of this research suggest that students require clear policies on the use of GAI and that these technologies should not be banned from university, but consideration must be made to ensure different groups of students have equal access to the technologies.

本项目旨在了解学生对聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT)等生成式人工智能(GAI)技术的看法,以便为利物浦大学学术诚信守则的修改提供参考。本研究的调查问卷由图书馆学生团队制作,并通过焦点小组审核。共有 2555 名学生参与了调查。结果显示,只有 7% 的受访学生没有听说过任何 GAI 技术,而超过一半的学生已经使用或考虑使用这些技术进行学术研究。大多数学生(54.1%)支持或有些支持使用 Grammarly 等工具,但 70.4% 的学生不支持或有些不支持学生使用 ChatGPT 等工具撰写整篇文章。对自己的学术写作有较高信心的学生不太可能使用或考虑将其用于学术目的,也不太可能支持其他学生使用这些工具。大多数学生(41.1%)还认为,应该制定一项大学范围内的政策,规定何时适合或不适合使用这些技术。研究结果表明,学生需要明确的 GAI 使用政策,大学不应该禁止使用这些技术,但必须考虑确保不同群体的学生有平等的机会使用这些技术。
{"title":"Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education","authors":"Heather Johnston, Rebecca F. Wells, Elizabeth M. Shanks, Timothy Boey, Bryony N. Parsons","doi":"10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p> The aim of this project was to understand student perspectives on generative artificial intelligence (GAI) technologies such as Chat generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), in order to inform changes to the University of Liverpool Academic Integrity code of practice. The survey for this study was created by a library student team and vetted through focus groups. A total of 2555 students participated in the survey. Results showed that only 7% of students who responded had not heard of any GAI technologies, whilst over half had used or considered using these for academic purposes. The majority of students (54.1%) were supportive or somewhat supportive of using tools such as Grammarly, but 70.4% were unsupportive or somewhat unsupportive towards students using tools such as ChatGPT to write their whole essay. Students who had higher levels of confidence in their academic writing were less likely to use or consider using them for academic purposes, and were also less likely to be supportive of other students using them. Most students (41.1%) also thought there should be a university wide policy on when these technologies are or are not appropriate to use. The results of this research suggest that students require clear policies on the use of GAI and that these technologies should not be banned from university, but consideration must be made to ensure different groups of students have equal access to the technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":44838,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139767152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
International Journal for Educational Integrity
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1