Sustainable investing in the US and European insurance industry: a text mining analysis

Nadine Gatzert, Philipp Reichel
{"title":"Sustainable investing in the US and European insurance industry: a text mining analysis","authors":"Nadine Gatzert, Philipp Reichel","doi":"10.1057/s41288-022-00270-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper uses a text mining analysis to study the development of sustainable investing in the European and US insurance industry as reflected in their public reports from 2013 to 2018. The sample comprises 1215 annual, sustainability- and investment-related documents of 77 firms. We develop a dictionary with principles, criteria and terminologies as well as strategies, and differentiate between the quality of reports. Our results show that the number of firms referring to as well as the word count related to sustainable investing substantially increase over the sample period, and that insurers reporting about sustainable investing are on average significantly larger. We also find that European insurers report much more extensively on their sustainable investment practices as compared to US insurers in our sample. Most relevant in 2018 are references to general <i>ESG</i> criteria, followed by <i>responsible investment</i> and the <i>Sustainable Development Goals</i>. Top strategies mentioned were <i>ESG integration</i> and <i>impact investing</i>, whereby we observe that insurers evolve from mentioning one single towards multiple strategies over time. Finally, a regression analysis does not show a value-effect of sustainable investment-related keywords in reporting on Tobin’s Q, which may be due to the rather long-term investment perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":75009,"journal":{"name":"The Geneva papers on risk and insurance. Issues and practice","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Geneva papers on risk and insurance. Issues and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-022-00270-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper uses a text mining analysis to study the development of sustainable investing in the European and US insurance industry as reflected in their public reports from 2013 to 2018. The sample comprises 1215 annual, sustainability- and investment-related documents of 77 firms. We develop a dictionary with principles, criteria and terminologies as well as strategies, and differentiate between the quality of reports. Our results show that the number of firms referring to as well as the word count related to sustainable investing substantially increase over the sample period, and that insurers reporting about sustainable investing are on average significantly larger. We also find that European insurers report much more extensively on their sustainable investment practices as compared to US insurers in our sample. Most relevant in 2018 are references to general ESG criteria, followed by responsible investment and the Sustainable Development Goals. Top strategies mentioned were ESG integration and impact investing, whereby we observe that insurers evolve from mentioning one single towards multiple strategies over time. Finally, a regression analysis does not show a value-effect of sustainable investment-related keywords in reporting on Tobin’s Q, which may be due to the rather long-term investment perspective.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国和欧洲保险业的可持续投资:文本挖掘分析
本文采用文本挖掘分析的方法,研究了2013年至2018年欧美保险业可持续投资的发展情况。样本包括77家公司的1215份年度、可持续性和投资相关文件。我们开发了一本包含原则、标准和术语以及策略的词典,并对报告的质量进行区分。我们的研究结果表明,与可持续投资相关的公司数量和字数在样本期间大幅增加,报告可持续投资的保险公司平均数量显著增加。我们还发现,在我们的样本中,与美国保险公司相比,欧洲保险公司对其可持续投资实践的报告要广泛得多。2018年最相关的是一般ESG标准,其次是负责任投资和可持续发展目标。提及最多的策略是ESG整合和影响力投资,我们观察到,随着时间的推移,保险公司从提到单一策略发展到提到多种策略。最后,回归分析并未显示Tobin’s Q报告中可持续投资相关关键词的价值效应,这可能是由于相当长期的投资视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microinsurance research: status quo and future research directions Investment in big data analytics and loss reserve accuracy: evidence from the U.S. property-liability insurance industry Actuarial premium calculation for beekeeping insurance in Turkiye Discretionary decisions in capital requirements under Solvency II Technology investment and insurer efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1