Eva Maria Bracht, Alina S. Hernandez Bark, Zhuolin She, Rolf Van Dick, Nina Mareen Junker
{"title":"The downside of phones at work: exploring negative relationships between leader phubbing and follower engagement/performance","authors":"Eva Maria Bracht, Alina S. Hernandez Bark, Zhuolin She, Rolf Van Dick, Nina Mareen Junker","doi":"10.1108/lodj-03-2023-0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The aim of this paper is gaining a deeper understanding of potential negative effects of (smart)phone use at work. The authors do so by exploring mediating mechanisms and boundary conditions between leader phubbing, leaders snubbing their followers by glancing at their phones during an interaction; and follower (1) work engagement and (2) performance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors conducted a survey-based time-lagged, multi-source and team-based study of leaders (<em>N</em> = 93) and their followers (<em>N</em> = 454).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Results of this paper showed that leader phubbing negatively relates to follower (1) work engagement and (2) performance through less perceived leader support. Contradictory to the hypothesis, the relationship between leader phubbing and perceived leader support was negative for male leaders only.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The authors contribute to existing research by (1) adding perceived support as an important mediator between leader phubbing and work engagement/performance, (2) exploring the effects of leader gender and (3) adding information on the cultural robustness of the leader phubbing phenomenon by testing it outside the Western work context.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48033,"journal":{"name":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","volume":"176 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-03-2023-0129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this paper is gaining a deeper understanding of potential negative effects of (smart)phone use at work. The authors do so by exploring mediating mechanisms and boundary conditions between leader phubbing, leaders snubbing their followers by glancing at their phones during an interaction; and follower (1) work engagement and (2) performance.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors conducted a survey-based time-lagged, multi-source and team-based study of leaders (N = 93) and their followers (N = 454).
Findings
Results of this paper showed that leader phubbing negatively relates to follower (1) work engagement and (2) performance through less perceived leader support. Contradictory to the hypothesis, the relationship between leader phubbing and perceived leader support was negative for male leaders only.
Originality/value
The authors contribute to existing research by (1) adding perceived support as an important mediator between leader phubbing and work engagement/performance, (2) exploring the effects of leader gender and (3) adding information on the cultural robustness of the leader phubbing phenomenon by testing it outside the Western work context.
期刊介绍:
The journal addresses a broad range of topics which are relevant to organizations and reflective of societal developments. Public and private sector organizations alike face ongoing pressure to streamline activities, improve efficiency and achieve demanding organizational objectives. In this context, the ability of senior managers to understand the culture and dynamics of organizations and to deliver strong leadership during periods of change, could be the difference between organizational failure and success.