Continuous Cover Forestry Practitioners in a Clear-cutting-oriented System: Assessing the Potential to Foster the Practice

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Small-Scale Forestry Pub Date : 2022-01-30 DOI:10.1007/s11842-022-09501-3
Maie Kiisel, Liina Remm
{"title":"Continuous Cover Forestry Practitioners in a Clear-cutting-oriented System: Assessing the Potential to Foster the Practice","authors":"Maie Kiisel, Liina Remm","doi":"10.1007/s11842-022-09501-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recently, changes in society have brought about the rediscovery of continuous cover forestry (CCF) as a forest management approach that helps to create multifunctional forests. However, the practice of CCF is only used in a relatively small area in the world, and its development potential is unclear. We studied the potential of forest owners practising CCF to act as niche experimenters to provide clear-cutting-oriented Estonian forestry with experience for the development of CCF for specific needs. We adopt a multi-level perspective of socio-technical transitions, which proposes that forest owners’ silvicultural choices develop and are stabilised in a complex, change-resistant and cross-sectoral framework that is formed by actors’ networks, material artefacts and rules. The spread of the alternative silvicultural approach depends on the susceptibility of this framework, but also on owners’ ability to form experimental niches: protected “incubation rooms” of change. To explore that potential, we visited eighteen forests and interviewed their owners to study their experiences in the enhancement of CCF. Our qualitative analysis demonstrates that the wider adoption of CCF is hindered due to several lock-in mechanisms in Estonian forestry but supported by related sectors. Some owners can apply CCF even within the present forestry framework due to their particular social embedding. However, it is unlikely that forest owners will start using CCF unless the forestry framework changes. We propose an analytical tool to enforce experimental CCF niche formation among the forest owners, as the necessity to apply CCF in the nearest future may increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":48983,"journal":{"name":"Small-Scale Forestry","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small-Scale Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-022-09501-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Recently, changes in society have brought about the rediscovery of continuous cover forestry (CCF) as a forest management approach that helps to create multifunctional forests. However, the practice of CCF is only used in a relatively small area in the world, and its development potential is unclear. We studied the potential of forest owners practising CCF to act as niche experimenters to provide clear-cutting-oriented Estonian forestry with experience for the development of CCF for specific needs. We adopt a multi-level perspective of socio-technical transitions, which proposes that forest owners’ silvicultural choices develop and are stabilised in a complex, change-resistant and cross-sectoral framework that is formed by actors’ networks, material artefacts and rules. The spread of the alternative silvicultural approach depends on the susceptibility of this framework, but also on owners’ ability to form experimental niches: protected “incubation rooms” of change. To explore that potential, we visited eighteen forests and interviewed their owners to study their experiences in the enhancement of CCF. Our qualitative analysis demonstrates that the wider adoption of CCF is hindered due to several lock-in mechanisms in Estonian forestry but supported by related sectors. Some owners can apply CCF even within the present forestry framework due to their particular social embedding. However, it is unlikely that forest owners will start using CCF unless the forestry framework changes. We propose an analytical tool to enforce experimental CCF niche formation among the forest owners, as the necessity to apply CCF in the nearest future may increase.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在以砍伐为导向的系统中持续覆盖林业从业者:评估促进实践的潜力
最近,社会的变化使人们重新发现连续覆盖森林(CCF)是一种有助于创造多功能森林的森林管理方法。然而,CCF的实践在世界范围内仅在相对较小的地区得到应用,其发展潜力尚不明确。我们研究了森林所有者实施CCF作为生态位试验者的潜力,以提供以砍伐为导向的爱沙尼亚林业,为特定需求发展CCF提供经验。我们采用了社会技术转型的多层次视角,提出森林所有者的造林选择在一个复杂的、抗变化的、跨部门的框架中发展和稳定,该框架由行动者的网络、物质人工制品和规则形成。替代造林方法的传播取决于该框架的易感性,但也取决于所有者形成实验性生态位的能力:受保护的变化“孵化室”。为了探索这方面的潜力,我们走访了18个森林,并采访了它们的所有者,了解他们在加强生态环境保护方面的经验。我们的定性分析表明,由于爱沙尼亚林业的几个锁定机制,CCF的广泛采用受到阻碍,但得到了相关部门的支持。由于特定的社会背景,一些业主甚至可以在目前的林业框架内应用CCF。然而,除非林业框架发生变化,否则森林所有者不太可能开始使用CCF。由于在不久的将来应用CCF的必要性可能会增加,我们提出了一种分析工具来强制实验CCF生态位在森林所有者中形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emerging from discussions within IUFRO’s Small-scale Forestry group, Small-scale Forestry was originally published as Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy in 2002, with a view to providing an international forum for publishing high quality, peer-reviewed papers on pure and applied research into small-scale forestry. Although of particular interest to the global research community, the journal is also relevant to both policy makers and forest managers. The scope of the journal is necessarily quite broad, given the range of issues relevant to small-scale forestry. These include the social, economic and technical dimensions of farm, family, non-industrial, agro- and community forestry. Papers are accepted on the basis that they relate specifically to forestry at this scale, and that they are based on high quality research using accepted quantitative and/or qualitative methodology. Empirical, theoretical, modeling, and methodological papers are all welcome. The following research areas are particularly relevant to the journal: -the role of small-scale forestry in rural development- financial modeling and decision support systems- enhancing return from non-wood products- social impacts of small-scale forestry- marketing, forest co-operatives and growers organizations- role and effectiveness of government support and subsidies- innovative research techniques- education and extension- certification- silvicultural, wood harvesting and processing techniques and technologies- impediments to small-scale forestry development- monitoring socio-economics- forest management behaviour and timber supply
期刊最新文献
Local Institutional Strength of Village and Community Forests in Indonesia Promoting Agroforestry in India: Policy Analysis for Felling and Transit of Woods Grown in Private Lands Forest Owner Attitudes and Preferences for Voluntary Temporary Forest Conservation Understanding the Experiences of Small-Scale Commercial Afforestation Farmers and Governance Conflicts in Manguzi, South Africa: Political Ecology Perspective Uncovering the Potential for the Sustainable Commercialization of Non-Timber Forest Products: Palm Fruits in Pando, Bolivia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1