Local Institutional Strength of Village and Community Forests in Indonesia

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY Small-Scale Forestry Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1007/s11842-024-09568-0
Ade Wahyu, Didik Suharjito, Dudung Darusman, Lailan Syaufina
{"title":"Local Institutional Strength of Village and Community Forests in Indonesia","authors":"Ade Wahyu, Didik Suharjito, Dudung Darusman, Lailan Syaufina","doi":"10.1007/s11842-024-09568-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Social forestry policies are implemented by establishing and developing local institutions to organize collective action in forest management. Therefore, a strong local institution will be one of the main factors determining the successful implementation of social forestry. This study aims to identify and describe the local institutional strength of village forests and community forests as Indonesia’s two largest social forestry schemes. Data and information from various documents, structured in-depth interviews, and field observations were used to measure and analyze the local institutional strength of three village forests in Kubu Raya Regency and three community forests in Belitung Regency, Indonesia. Research results show that of the three village forests and three community forests cases, only one community forest is considered to have a strong local institution even though it has not yet reached the maximum value, both in the stability and enforcement dimensions. Three village forests and two other community forests are considered to have adequate institutional stability, albeit their institutional enforcement remains weak. Organizational structures, roles, and rules are merely paper documents that cannot be enforced or are not intended to be enforced. Several factors contributing to the local institutional strength are stability and effectiveness of roles, rules, and sanctions, local government support, community needs and interests, and benefit distribution, which interact with and influence each other. Government, researchers, and civil society organizations as social forestry facilitators, should pay more attention to these factors, so they can build and develop stronger local institutions for the success of social forestry.</p>","PeriodicalId":48983,"journal":{"name":"Small-Scale Forestry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small-Scale Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-024-09568-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social forestry policies are implemented by establishing and developing local institutions to organize collective action in forest management. Therefore, a strong local institution will be one of the main factors determining the successful implementation of social forestry. This study aims to identify and describe the local institutional strength of village forests and community forests as Indonesia’s two largest social forestry schemes. Data and information from various documents, structured in-depth interviews, and field observations were used to measure and analyze the local institutional strength of three village forests in Kubu Raya Regency and three community forests in Belitung Regency, Indonesia. Research results show that of the three village forests and three community forests cases, only one community forest is considered to have a strong local institution even though it has not yet reached the maximum value, both in the stability and enforcement dimensions. Three village forests and two other community forests are considered to have adequate institutional stability, albeit their institutional enforcement remains weak. Organizational structures, roles, and rules are merely paper documents that cannot be enforced or are not intended to be enforced. Several factors contributing to the local institutional strength are stability and effectiveness of roles, rules, and sanctions, local government support, community needs and interests, and benefit distribution, which interact with and influence each other. Government, researchers, and civil society organizations as social forestry facilitators, should pay more attention to these factors, so they can build and develop stronger local institutions for the success of social forestry.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚村庄和社区森林的地方机构实力
社会林业政策是通过建立和发展地方机构来组织森林管理的集体行动来实施的。因此,强有力的地方机构将是决定社会林业能否成功实施的主要因素之一。本研究旨在确定和描述村级森林和社区森林这两个印尼最大的社会林业计划的地方机构实力。通过各种文件、结构化深入访谈和实地观察获得的数据和信息,用于衡量和分析印度尼西亚库布拉亚行政区(Kubu Raya Regency)的三个村庄森林和勿里洞行政区(Belitung Regency)的三个社区森林的地方制度优势。研究结果表明,在三个村庄森林和三个社区森林案例中,只有一个社区森林被认为拥有强大的地方机构,尽管其在稳定性和执行力两个维度上都尚未达到最大值。三个村庄森林和另外两个社区森林被认为具有足够的机构稳定性,尽管其机构执行力仍然较弱。组织结构、角色和规则只是一纸空文,无法执行或无意执行。影响当地机构实力的几个因素包括:角色、规则和制裁的稳定性和有效性,当地政府的支持,社区的需求和利益,以及利益分配,这些因素相互影响、相互作用。政府、研究人员和民间社会组织作为社会林业的推动者,应更多地关注这些因素,从而为社会林业的成功建立和发展更强大的地方机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emerging from discussions within IUFRO’s Small-scale Forestry group, Small-scale Forestry was originally published as Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy in 2002, with a view to providing an international forum for publishing high quality, peer-reviewed papers on pure and applied research into small-scale forestry. Although of particular interest to the global research community, the journal is also relevant to both policy makers and forest managers. The scope of the journal is necessarily quite broad, given the range of issues relevant to small-scale forestry. These include the social, economic and technical dimensions of farm, family, non-industrial, agro- and community forestry. Papers are accepted on the basis that they relate specifically to forestry at this scale, and that they are based on high quality research using accepted quantitative and/or qualitative methodology. Empirical, theoretical, modeling, and methodological papers are all welcome. The following research areas are particularly relevant to the journal: -the role of small-scale forestry in rural development- financial modeling and decision support systems- enhancing return from non-wood products- social impacts of small-scale forestry- marketing, forest co-operatives and growers organizations- role and effectiveness of government support and subsidies- innovative research techniques- education and extension- certification- silvicultural, wood harvesting and processing techniques and technologies- impediments to small-scale forestry development- monitoring socio-economics- forest management behaviour and timber supply
期刊最新文献
Local Institutional Strength of Village and Community Forests in Indonesia Promoting Agroforestry in India: Policy Analysis for Felling and Transit of Woods Grown in Private Lands Forest Owner Attitudes and Preferences for Voluntary Temporary Forest Conservation Ecological Perspective, Perception, and Attitude of Local Communities Toward Managing and Utilizing the Mangrove Ecosystem in Lampung Province, Indonesia Understanding the Experiences of Small-Scale Commercial Afforestation Farmers and Governance Conflicts in Manguzi, South Africa: Political Ecology Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1