Knowledge and use of voluntary food and drink guidelines in English nurseries? Results from a nationally representative cross-sectional study

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Food Policy Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102573
Emily Warren, Paul Boadu, Josephine Exley, Lorraine Williams, Bob Erens, Cécile Knai
{"title":"Knowledge and use of voluntary food and drink guidelines in English nurseries? Results from a nationally representative cross-sectional study","authors":"Emily Warren,&nbsp;Paul Boadu,&nbsp;Josephine Exley,&nbsp;Lorraine Williams,&nbsp;Bob Erens,&nbsp;Cécile Knai","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Good nutrition in early life is vital for healthy development, and sets the stage for good health throughout the life-course. Most children aged 0–4 years old in the UK spend at least some time each week in an early years’ setting (EYS), such as a nursery or childminder. Unlike schools which serve older children, there are no statutory standards for the food and drinks served to the youngest children in EYS, despite the potential for greater public health gains due to early intervention. Two comprehensive, age-appropriate voluntary guidelines were developed, one called the <em>Example Menus for Early Years Settings in England</em> by the government and another, called <em>Eat Better, Start Better</em> by a charity. Both are seen as standard across the sector. To assess nurseries’ awareness and use of voluntary guidelines, including how they are used and how they can be improved upon, and examine how these vary by socioeconomic deprivation and setting types (private nurseries and voluntary, community and charity nurseries), we conducted the first nationally representative cross-sectional survey of nurseries in England via an online survey. Using frequency distributions and binomial multivariate logistic regression models, considerable discrepancies between awareness (82.6 %) and use (48.8 %) of available EYS dietary guidelines were found. A key reason for not using guidelines was ‘I know what is healthy without them.’ The question about whether following food and drink guidelines should be voluntary or statutory generated mixed findings. More research is required to understand the factors influencing nurseries’ views on whether guidelines should be voluntary or statutory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919223001719/pdfft?md5=0d014bb06af3fcc26f4e0eda5d1d255f&pid=1-s2.0-S0306919223001719-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919223001719","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Good nutrition in early life is vital for healthy development, and sets the stage for good health throughout the life-course. Most children aged 0–4 years old in the UK spend at least some time each week in an early years’ setting (EYS), such as a nursery or childminder. Unlike schools which serve older children, there are no statutory standards for the food and drinks served to the youngest children in EYS, despite the potential for greater public health gains due to early intervention. Two comprehensive, age-appropriate voluntary guidelines were developed, one called the Example Menus for Early Years Settings in England by the government and another, called Eat Better, Start Better by a charity. Both are seen as standard across the sector. To assess nurseries’ awareness and use of voluntary guidelines, including how they are used and how they can be improved upon, and examine how these vary by socioeconomic deprivation and setting types (private nurseries and voluntary, community and charity nurseries), we conducted the first nationally representative cross-sectional survey of nurseries in England via an online survey. Using frequency distributions and binomial multivariate logistic regression models, considerable discrepancies between awareness (82.6 %) and use (48.8 %) of available EYS dietary guidelines were found. A key reason for not using guidelines was ‘I know what is healthy without them.’ The question about whether following food and drink guidelines should be voluntary or statutory generated mixed findings. More research is required to understand the factors influencing nurseries’ views on whether guidelines should be voluntary or statutory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国幼儿园对自愿性食品和饮料指南的了解和使用情况?一项具有全国代表性的横断面研究的结果
生命早期的良好营养对健康成长至关重要,并为一生的健康奠定了基础。在英国,大多数 0-4 岁的儿童每周至少有一段时间是在幼年环境(EYS)中度过的,如托儿所或儿童托管人。与为年长儿童提供服务的学校不同,尽管早期干预有可能带来更大的公共卫生收益,但对于幼年环境中为最年幼儿童提供的食品和饮料,却没有法定标准。政府和一家慈善机构分别制定了名为《吃得更好,开始得更好》(Eat Better, Start Better)和《英格兰幼儿教育机构菜单范例》(Example Menus for Early Years Settings in England)的指南。这两份指南都被视为整个行业的标准。为了评估托儿所对自愿性指南的认识和使用情况,包括如何使用这些指南以及如何对其进行改进,并研究这些指南在社会经济贫困程度和托儿所类型(私立托儿所以及自愿、社区和慈善托儿所)方面的差异,我们通过在线调查对英格兰的托儿所进行了首次具有全国代表性的横断面调查。通过频率分布和二项多变量逻辑回归模型,我们发现在对现有的幼儿健康教育饮食指南的知晓率(82.6%)和使用率(48.8%)之间存在相当大的差异。不使用指南的一个主要原因是'没有指南我也知道什么是健康的'。关于遵守饮食指南应是自愿还是法定的问题,调查结果不一。需要进行更多的研究,以了解影响幼儿园对指南应是自愿还是法定的看法的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
期刊最新文献
Towards sustainable beef: The role of altruistic preference in the value chain transformation Food politics in China: How strengthened accountability enhances food security Making ends meet in refugee camps: Food distribution cycles, consumption and undernutrition Between dissonance and confusion: When the Nutri-Score as a nutritional signal is misinterpreted Assessing misallocation in agriculture: Plots versus farms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1