Chaoqun Ba, S. Zhai, J. Qian, Bo Liu, Jinlei Zhu, Zhimin Liu
{"title":"Trade-offs in growth and reproduction of rhizomatous clonal plant Phragmites communis in response to aeolian processes","authors":"Chaoqun Ba, S. Zhai, J. Qian, Bo Liu, Jinlei Zhu, Zhimin Liu","doi":"10.1093/jpe/rtad043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Trade-offs in growth and reproduction are essential parts of the adaptive strategies of clonal plants. How rhizomatous psammophytes respond to aeolian processes (sand burial and wind erosion) by means of trade-offs is supposed to be especially important for their colonization on the active sand dune. Despite the responses of rhizomatous species to aeolian processes have been partly documented, how these clonal species respond to aeolian processes by means of potential trade-offs in growth and reproduction still remains unclear. In this study we employed field investigation and biomass modelling to evaluate the trade-offs between vegetative and reproductive growth as well as between the number and size of ramets of Phragmites communis in response to sand burial and wind erosion. Sand burial promoted the accumulation of seed biomass and reproductive effort (RE). Wind erosion reduced RE but had no significant influence on seed biomass. Sand burial increased the biomass of ramets, while wind erosion increased ramet population density and accelerated ramet maturation. Our study demonstrates that rhizomatous psammophytes adjust their growth strategies in response to aeolian processes, i.e., reproductive growth and ramet size increase responding to sand burial, while vegetative growth and ramet numbers increase responding to wind erosion.","PeriodicalId":50085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtad043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Trade-offs in growth and reproduction are essential parts of the adaptive strategies of clonal plants. How rhizomatous psammophytes respond to aeolian processes (sand burial and wind erosion) by means of trade-offs is supposed to be especially important for their colonization on the active sand dune. Despite the responses of rhizomatous species to aeolian processes have been partly documented, how these clonal species respond to aeolian processes by means of potential trade-offs in growth and reproduction still remains unclear. In this study we employed field investigation and biomass modelling to evaluate the trade-offs between vegetative and reproductive growth as well as between the number and size of ramets of Phragmites communis in response to sand burial and wind erosion. Sand burial promoted the accumulation of seed biomass and reproductive effort (RE). Wind erosion reduced RE but had no significant influence on seed biomass. Sand burial increased the biomass of ramets, while wind erosion increased ramet population density and accelerated ramet maturation. Our study demonstrates that rhizomatous psammophytes adjust their growth strategies in response to aeolian processes, i.e., reproductive growth and ramet size increase responding to sand burial, while vegetative growth and ramet numbers increase responding to wind erosion.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Plant Ecology (JPE) serves as an important medium for ecologists to present research findings and discuss challenging issues in the broad field of plants and their interactions with biotic and abiotic environment. The JPE will cover all aspects of plant ecology, including plant ecophysiology, population ecology, community ecology, ecosystem ecology and landscape ecology as well as conservation ecology, evolutionary ecology, and theoretical ecology.