Two-way employment-driving effect of manufacturing and producer services: Evidence from China

Yanan Liang, Cheng Zhang
{"title":"Two-way employment-driving effect of manufacturing and producer services: Evidence from China","authors":"Yanan Liang, Cheng Zhang","doi":"10.36922/ijps.0316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Employment holds paramount importance in people’s lives, and the employment interaction between manufacturing and producer services plays a crucial role in steadily expanding employment opportunities, thereby achieving high-quality full employment. This paper delves into the data of A-share listed companies in China from 2012 to 2020, exploring the two-way effects of producer services on manufacturing and vice versa. The results reveal a significantly positive two-way employment-driving effect between manufacturing and producer services. Notably, the employment-driving effect of producer services is stronger than that of manufacturing enterprises. The results of the heterogeneity test based on the breakdown types of producer services and manufacturing highlight that the employment-driving effect of high-tech services on manufacturing is more prominent, approximately 2.85 times greater than that of non-high-tech services. This suggests a clear and substantial scale technology effect. Conversely, the employment-driving effect of high-tech manufacturing on producer services is found to be insignificant. In conclusion, the findings underscore the significant impact of producer services in driving manufacturing employment. It is imperative for the government to enhance its support for producer services enterprises and broaden employment opportunities within these sectors.","PeriodicalId":73473,"journal":{"name":"International journal of population studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of population studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.0316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Employment holds paramount importance in people’s lives, and the employment interaction between manufacturing and producer services plays a crucial role in steadily expanding employment opportunities, thereby achieving high-quality full employment. This paper delves into the data of A-share listed companies in China from 2012 to 2020, exploring the two-way effects of producer services on manufacturing and vice versa. The results reveal a significantly positive two-way employment-driving effect between manufacturing and producer services. Notably, the employment-driving effect of producer services is stronger than that of manufacturing enterprises. The results of the heterogeneity test based on the breakdown types of producer services and manufacturing highlight that the employment-driving effect of high-tech services on manufacturing is more prominent, approximately 2.85 times greater than that of non-high-tech services. This suggests a clear and substantial scale technology effect. Conversely, the employment-driving effect of high-tech manufacturing on producer services is found to be insignificant. In conclusion, the findings underscore the significant impact of producer services in driving manufacturing employment. It is imperative for the government to enhance its support for producer services enterprises and broaden employment opportunities within these sectors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制造业和生产性服务业对就业的双向拉动效应:来自中国的证据
就业是民生之本,制造业和生产性服务业之间的就业互动是稳定扩大就业、实现高质量充分就业的关键。本文以中国a股上市公司2012 - 2020年的数据为研究对象,探讨生产性服务业对制造业的双向影响以及制造业对生产性服务业的双向影响。结果表明,制造业与生产性服务业之间存在显著的正向双向就业驱动效应。值得注意的是,生产性服务业的就业带动作用强于制造业。基于生产性服务业和制造业细分类型的异质性检验结果表明,高技术服务业对制造业的就业带动作用更为突出,约为非高技术服务业的2.85倍。这表明了一个明显和实质性的规模技术效应。相反,高技术制造业对生产性服务业的就业带动作用不显著。总之,研究结果强调了生产性服务业在推动制造业就业方面的重大影响。政府必须加大对生产性服务业的支持力度,扩大生产性服务业的就业机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Indian family relationships, marriage, and career choices in the context of globalization: A multigenerational evaluation Marital dissolution in India: Patterns and correlates COVID-19 and the precarious low-skilled workforce in the European Union: Time to call the shots? Assessment of prenatal care adequacy using different normative criteria in a municipality in Santa Catarina, Brazil Interstate outmigration in India and the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and emerging perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1