{"title":"Ten propositions on machine learning in official statistics","authors":"Arnout van Delden, Joep Burger, Marco Puts","doi":"10.1007/s11943-023-00330-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used in official statistics with a range of different applications. The main focus of ML models is to accurately predict attributes of new, unlabeled cases whereas the focus of classical statistical models is to describe the relations between independent and dependent variables. There is already a lot of experience in the sound use of classical statistical models in official statistics, but for ML models this is still under development. Recent discussions concerning the quality aspects of using ML in official statistics have concentrated on its implications for existing quality frameworks. We are in favor of the use of ML in official statistics, but the main question remains as to what factors need to be considered when using ML models in official statistics. As a means of raising awareness regarding these factors, we pose ten propositions regarding the (sensible) use of ML in official statistics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100134,"journal":{"name":"AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv","volume":"17 3-4","pages":"195 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11943-023-00330-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used in official statistics with a range of different applications. The main focus of ML models is to accurately predict attributes of new, unlabeled cases whereas the focus of classical statistical models is to describe the relations between independent and dependent variables. There is already a lot of experience in the sound use of classical statistical models in official statistics, but for ML models this is still under development. Recent discussions concerning the quality aspects of using ML in official statistics have concentrated on its implications for existing quality frameworks. We are in favor of the use of ML in official statistics, but the main question remains as to what factors need to be considered when using ML models in official statistics. As a means of raising awareness regarding these factors, we pose ten propositions regarding the (sensible) use of ML in official statistics.
机器学习(ML)正越来越多地应用于官方统计中的一系列不同领域。ML 模型的主要重点是准确预测未标记的新案例的属性,而经典统计模型的重点是描述自变量和因变量之间的关系。在官方统计中合理使用经典统计模型方面已经有了很多经验,但对于 ML 模型来说,这仍处于发展阶段。最近有关在官方统计中使用 ML 的质量问题的讨论主要集中在其对现有质量框架的影响上。我们赞成在官方统计中使用 ML,但主要问题仍然是在官方统计中使用 ML 模型时需要考虑哪些因素。为了提高对这些因素的认识,我们提出了关于在官方统计中(合理)使用 ML 的十项主张。