Politik Hukum Perubahan Undang-Undang Kejaksaan terkait Kerjasama dengan Lembaga Penegak Hukum dan Instansi Lainnya

Alfy Nazah Aulia, A. Arfiani, Henny Andriani
{"title":"Politik Hukum Perubahan Undang-Undang Kejaksaan terkait Kerjasama dengan Lembaga Penegak Hukum dan Instansi Lainnya","authors":"Alfy Nazah Aulia, A. Arfiani, Henny Andriani","doi":"10.25077/llr.1.2.139-148.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal politics is necessary for examining the changes that need to be made to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office to meet the needs of society. An analysis in Article 33 of the aforementioned law, which shows how crucial law enforcement agencies are in collaborating in the implementation of state power. The purpose of this article is to understand the legal politics of change and the implications of changes in collaboration regulations between the Prosecutor's Office and other law enforcement agencies and institutions. This article uses a Normative Juridical method. The research findings are as follows: first, the legal politics of the changes in Law Number 16 of 2004, which became Law Number 11 of 2021 on amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office, especially in Article 33 related to the collaboration of the Republic of Indonesia's Prosecutor's Office with other law enforcement agencies and institutions, were established to determine the position of the Prosecutor's Office in law enforcement in Indonesia. Therefore, the Prosecutor's Office collaborates with other law enforcement agencies and institutions to achieve the goals of the Prosecutor's Office itself. Second, the implications of the changes in Article 33 of the aforementioned law have an impact on the role of the Prosecutor's Office in the performance of prosecution, which can collaborate with various national and international law enforcement agencies, including institutions or organizations. Collaboration between the Prosecutor's Office and other law enforcement agencies can be seen in Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs).","PeriodicalId":489319,"journal":{"name":"Lareh Law Review","volume":"26 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lareh Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25077/llr.1.2.139-148.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Legal politics is necessary for examining the changes that need to be made to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office to meet the needs of society. An analysis in Article 33 of the aforementioned law, which shows how crucial law enforcement agencies are in collaborating in the implementation of state power. The purpose of this article is to understand the legal politics of change and the implications of changes in collaboration regulations between the Prosecutor's Office and other law enforcement agencies and institutions. This article uses a Normative Juridical method. The research findings are as follows: first, the legal politics of the changes in Law Number 16 of 2004, which became Law Number 11 of 2021 on amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office, especially in Article 33 related to the collaboration of the Republic of Indonesia's Prosecutor's Office with other law enforcement agencies and institutions, were established to determine the position of the Prosecutor's Office in law enforcement in Indonesia. Therefore, the Prosecutor's Office collaborates with other law enforcement agencies and institutions to achieve the goals of the Prosecutor's Office itself. Second, the implications of the changes in Article 33 of the aforementioned law have an impact on the role of the Prosecutor's Office in the performance of prosecution, which can collaborate with various national and international law enforcement agencies, including institutions or organizations. Collaboration between the Prosecutor's Office and other law enforcement agencies can be seen in Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与执法机构和其他机构合作相关的《检察官办公室法》修正案的法律政治意义
为了审查需要对2004年关于检察官办公室的第16号法律作出的修改,以满足社会的需要,法律政治是必要的。上述法律第33条的分析表明,执法机构在合作实施国家权力方面是多么重要。本文的目的是了解变革的法律政治以及检察官办公室与其他执法机构和机构之间的合作条例变化的影响。本文采用了规范法学的方法。研究结果如下:首先,建立了2004年第16号法律变更的法律政治,该法律变更成为2021年第11号法律,修改了2004年关于检察官办公室的第16号法律,特别是关于印度尼西亚共和国检察官办公室与其他执法机构和机构合作的第33条,以确定印度尼西亚检察官办公室在执法中的地位。因此,检察官办公室与其他执法机构和机构合作,以实现检察官办公室本身的目标。第二,上述法律第33条的修改所涉问题影响到检察官办公室在执行起诉方面的作用,检察官办公室可以同各种国家和国际执法机构,包括各机构或组织合作。检察官办公室与其他执法机构之间的合作可以在谅解备忘录中看到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Dalam Investasi Ilegal Akibat Promosi Media Online Influencer Melalui Akun Youtube Politik Hukum Perubahan Undang-Undang Kejaksaan terkait Kerjasama dengan Lembaga Penegak Hukum dan Instansi Lainnya Perbedaan Pandangan Terhadap Pembatasan Hak Dipilih Antara Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dengan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Quo Vadis: Pemberlakuan Undang – Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Terhadap Keberadaan Pajak Daerah Kota Padang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1