Pub Date : 2023-12-07DOI: 10.25077/llr.1.2.139-148.2023
Alfy Nazah Aulia, A. Arfiani, Henny Andriani
Legal politics is necessary for examining the changes that need to be made to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office to meet the needs of society. An analysis in Article 33 of the aforementioned law, which shows how crucial law enforcement agencies are in collaborating in the implementation of state power. The purpose of this article is to understand the legal politics of change and the implications of changes in collaboration regulations between the Prosecutor's Office and other law enforcement agencies and institutions. This article uses a Normative Juridical method. The research findings are as follows: first, the legal politics of the changes in Law Number 16 of 2004, which became Law Number 11 of 2021 on amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office, especially in Article 33 related to the collaboration of the Republic of Indonesia's Prosecutor's Office with other law enforcement agencies and institutions, were established to determine the position of the Prosecutor's Office in law enforcement in Indonesia. Therefore, the Prosecutor's Office collaborates with other law enforcement agencies and institutions to achieve the goals of the Prosecutor's Office itself. Second, the implications of the changes in Article 33 of the aforementioned law have an impact on the role of the Prosecutor's Office in the performance of prosecution, which can collaborate with various national and international law enforcement agencies, including institutions or organizations. Collaboration between the Prosecutor's Office and other law enforcement agencies can be seen in Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs).
{"title":"Politik Hukum Perubahan Undang-Undang Kejaksaan terkait Kerjasama dengan Lembaga Penegak Hukum dan Instansi Lainnya","authors":"Alfy Nazah Aulia, A. Arfiani, Henny Andriani","doi":"10.25077/llr.1.2.139-148.2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25077/llr.1.2.139-148.2023","url":null,"abstract":"Legal politics is necessary for examining the changes that need to be made to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office to meet the needs of society. An analysis in Article 33 of the aforementioned law, which shows how crucial law enforcement agencies are in collaborating in the implementation of state power. The purpose of this article is to understand the legal politics of change and the implications of changes in collaboration regulations between the Prosecutor's Office and other law enforcement agencies and institutions. This article uses a Normative Juridical method. The research findings are as follows: first, the legal politics of the changes in Law Number 16 of 2004, which became Law Number 11 of 2021 on amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office, especially in Article 33 related to the collaboration of the Republic of Indonesia's Prosecutor's Office with other law enforcement agencies and institutions, were established to determine the position of the Prosecutor's Office in law enforcement in Indonesia. Therefore, the Prosecutor's Office collaborates with other law enforcement agencies and institutions to achieve the goals of the Prosecutor's Office itself. Second, the implications of the changes in Article 33 of the aforementioned law have an impact on the role of the Prosecutor's Office in the performance of prosecution, which can collaborate with various national and international law enforcement agencies, including institutions or organizations. Collaboration between the Prosecutor's Office and other law enforcement agencies can be seen in Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs).","PeriodicalId":489319,"journal":{"name":"Lareh Law Review","volume":"26 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138594304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-07DOI: 10.25077/llr.1.2.176-189.2023
Shelsy Merinda, D. Amelia, Upita Anggunsuri
The use of social media in online investment activities should ideally provide convenience to the public for investing their assets. The prevalence of online investments within the community does not rule out the possibility that some of them are illegal or unauthorized investments, leading to losses for citizen. Legal protection can be provided to investors namely domains of illegal futures brokerage companies, cessation of illegal futures trading promotion, monitoring and observation of illegal futures trading sites by the regulatory authority. However, there are no explicit rules regarding penalties for influencers promoting binary option trading due to the lack of clear regulations about binary options. The research questions addressed in this study are: What is legal protection to investors in illegal investments YouTube? What is the function of BAPPEBT) to prevent illegal investments due to online influencer promotions YouTube? This research uses the normative juridical. The Conclusion of the research are BAPPEBTI offers preventive protection to the public by continually monitoring and educating about investment procedures in line with regulations. BAPPEBTI can block illegal sites based on regulation, but it can’t prohibit binary option trading due to the persistent emergence of domain sites. Contradictory regulations regarding the submission of claims for Restitution and Compensation result in investors lacking legal protection. BAPPEBTI’s role involves ongoing efforts in monitoring, observation, blocking illegal investment websites, education, and public awareness campaigns. BAPPEBTI is also part of the anti investment scam task force to halt investment solicitation and remove content related to Quotex and binary options.
{"title":"Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Dalam Investasi Ilegal Akibat Promosi Media Online Influencer Melalui Akun Youtube","authors":"Shelsy Merinda, D. Amelia, Upita Anggunsuri","doi":"10.25077/llr.1.2.176-189.2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25077/llr.1.2.176-189.2023","url":null,"abstract":"The use of social media in online investment activities should ideally provide convenience to the public for investing their assets. The prevalence of online investments within the community does not rule out the possibility that some of them are illegal or unauthorized investments, leading to losses for citizen. Legal protection can be provided to investors namely domains of illegal futures brokerage companies, cessation of illegal futures trading promotion, monitoring and observation of illegal futures trading sites by the regulatory authority. However, there are no explicit rules regarding penalties for influencers promoting binary option trading due to the lack of clear regulations about binary options. The research questions addressed in this study are: What is legal protection to investors in illegal investments YouTube? What is the function of BAPPEBT) to prevent illegal investments due to online influencer promotions YouTube? This research uses the normative juridical. The Conclusion of the research are BAPPEBTI offers preventive protection to the public by continually monitoring and educating about investment procedures in line with regulations. BAPPEBTI can block illegal sites based on regulation, but it can’t prohibit binary option trading due to the persistent emergence of domain sites. Contradictory regulations regarding the submission of claims for Restitution and Compensation result in investors lacking legal protection. BAPPEBTI’s role involves ongoing efforts in monitoring, observation, blocking illegal investment websites, education, and public awareness campaigns. BAPPEBTI is also part of the anti investment scam task force to halt investment solicitation and remove content related to Quotex and binary options.","PeriodicalId":489319,"journal":{"name":"Lareh Law Review","volume":"46 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138592277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-05DOI: 10.25077/llr.1.2.102-116.2023
Fajrin Kurniawan, Frenadin Adegustara, Gusminarti
The existence of financial relations between the central government and regional governments is an embodiment of the concept of delegating authority from the central government to regional governments which is referred to as "Regional Autonomy". Through the dynamics of central and regional government financial relations, a financial management system is required that regulates financial rights and obligations between the central government and regional governments that are carried out in a fair, transparent, accountable and aligned manner based on laws and regulations. The presence of Law Number 1 of 2022 concerning Financial Relations between the Central Government and Regional Governments, is an improvement in the implementation of financial relations between the central government and regional governments as an effort to create an efficient allocation of national resources. So through this research the focus of the analysis on the two main pillars. First, how are the preparations for the implementation of Law Number 1 of 2022 on the Padang City Government in order to increase the regional tax sector? Second, what is the response of the Padang City Government to the implementation of tax options in Law Number 1 of 2022? To answer the focus of the study, this research uses empirical juridical research methods with research specifications to the Regional Revenue Agency of Padang City and is analyzed through library research and data analysis methods using juridical-qualitative. The results of this study conclude that the Municipal Government of Padang in preparation for the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2022 has carried out activities such as completing the drafting of the implementing Regional Regulations with the Provincial Government of West Sumatra, conducting regional potential studies with competent parties, conducting outreach to the public as taxpayers, and technical guidance to tax collector employees within the Regional Government Organization (OPD) in order to maximize the regional wealth potential in the City of Padang.
{"title":"Quo Vadis: Pemberlakuan Undang – Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Terhadap Keberadaan Pajak Daerah Kota Padang","authors":"Fajrin Kurniawan, Frenadin Adegustara, Gusminarti","doi":"10.25077/llr.1.2.102-116.2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25077/llr.1.2.102-116.2023","url":null,"abstract":"The existence of financial relations between the central government and regional governments is an embodiment of the concept of delegating authority from the central government to regional governments which is referred to as \"Regional Autonomy\". Through the dynamics of central and regional government financial relations, a financial management system is required that regulates financial rights and obligations between the central government and regional governments that are carried out in a fair, transparent, accountable and aligned manner based on laws and regulations. The presence of Law Number 1 of 2022 concerning Financial Relations between the Central Government and Regional Governments, is an improvement in the implementation of financial relations between the central government and regional governments as an effort to create an efficient allocation of national resources. So through this research the focus of the analysis on the two main pillars. First, how are the preparations for the implementation of Law Number 1 of 2022 on the Padang City Government in order to increase the regional tax sector? Second, what is the response of the Padang City Government to the implementation of tax options in Law Number 1 of 2022? To answer the focus of the study, this research uses empirical juridical research methods with research specifications to the Regional Revenue Agency of Padang City and is analyzed through library research and data analysis methods using juridical-qualitative. The results of this study conclude that the Municipal Government of Padang in preparation for the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2022 has carried out activities such as completing the drafting of the implementing Regional Regulations with the Provincial Government of West Sumatra, conducting regional potential studies with competent parties, conducting outreach to the public as taxpayers, and technical guidance to tax collector employees within the Regional Government Organization (OPD) in order to maximize the regional wealth potential in the City of Padang.","PeriodicalId":489319,"journal":{"name":"Lareh Law Review","volume":"12 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138600990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-05DOI: 10.25077/llr.1.2.117-127.2023
Qaidah Bazilah Bazlaa, D. Setiawan, Feri Amsari
In general elections, the public has the right, namely, not to vote, and the right to be elected. The right to be elected is the right of citizens to be elected as members of deliberative bodies or representatives of the people in a general election. Article 240 paragraph (1) letter g of the General Election Law regulates restrictions on the right to vote for former corruption convicts. Regarding the norms in this article, the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court have different views. This is formulated in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 87/PUU-XX/2022 and the Supreme Court Decision Number 46P/HUM/2018. This article analyzes the views of Constitutional Justices and Supreme Court Justices regarding the norms in article 240, paragraph (1) letter g. The purpose of this article is to find out how voting rights are limited for former corruption convicts. This article uses a normative juridical research method. The research results found that first, restrictions on the right to vote for former convicts may be carried out in the interests of ensuring the freedom of disadvantaged groups. Second, in deciding a decision, the judge is obliged to explore, follow and understand the legal values and sense of justice that exist in society as well as pay attention to the juridical aspect.
{"title":"Perbedaan Pandangan Terhadap Pembatasan Hak Dipilih Antara Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dengan Putusan Mahkamah Agung","authors":"Qaidah Bazilah Bazlaa, D. Setiawan, Feri Amsari","doi":"10.25077/llr.1.2.117-127.2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25077/llr.1.2.117-127.2023","url":null,"abstract":"In general elections, the public has the right, namely, not to vote, and the right to be elected. The right to be elected is the right of citizens to be elected as members of deliberative bodies or representatives of the people in a general election. Article 240 paragraph (1) letter g of the General Election Law regulates restrictions on the right to vote for former corruption convicts. Regarding the norms in this article, the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court have different views. This is formulated in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 87/PUU-XX/2022 and the Supreme Court Decision Number 46P/HUM/2018. This article analyzes the views of Constitutional Justices and Supreme Court Justices regarding the norms in article 240, paragraph (1) letter g. The purpose of this article is to find out how voting rights are limited for former corruption convicts. This article uses a normative juridical research method. The research results found that first, restrictions on the right to vote for former convicts may be carried out in the interests of ensuring the freedom of disadvantaged groups. Second, in deciding a decision, the judge is obliged to explore, follow and understand the legal values and sense of justice that exist in society as well as pay attention to the juridical aspect.","PeriodicalId":489319,"journal":{"name":"Lareh Law Review","volume":"112 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138599727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：