“Having leapt never look back”: Who stays with Russia and how are imports redistributed?

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS Voprosy Ekonomiki Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI:10.32609/0042-8736-2023-12-48-65
A. Gnidchenko, O. M. Mikheeva, V. A. Salnikov
{"title":"“Having leapt never look back”: Who stays with Russia and how are imports redistributed?","authors":"A. Gnidchenko, O. M. Mikheeva, V. A. Salnikov","doi":"10.32609/0042-8736-2023-12-48-65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the division of countries according to their political attitude towards Russia after the launch of a special military operation in Ukraine and the introduction of large-scale sanctions, and illustrate the importance of sanctions and political attitude to Russia for countries’ exports there with the available statistical data. The countries are clustered by their participation in sanctions pressure on Russia and voting on six UN resolutions condemning Russia’s actions. Except for hostile countries, we distinguish three groups of friendly countries — “cautious” (voting for UN resolutions), “wavering” (non-systematic voting), and “sympathetic” (voting against resolutions or ignoring them). According to mirror data on foreign trade with Russia, most countries which increased their exports to Russia in 2022 belong to the “sympathizers” group. Relying on the evidence from the EU and China, we demonstrate that imports of sanctioned goods are redistributed more actively than other imports. We list major products which imports were redistributed successfully or unsuccessfully.","PeriodicalId":45534,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","volume":"129 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-12-48-65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine the division of countries according to their political attitude towards Russia after the launch of a special military operation in Ukraine and the introduction of large-scale sanctions, and illustrate the importance of sanctions and political attitude to Russia for countries’ exports there with the available statistical data. The countries are clustered by their participation in sanctions pressure on Russia and voting on six UN resolutions condemning Russia’s actions. Except for hostile countries, we distinguish three groups of friendly countries — “cautious” (voting for UN resolutions), “wavering” (non-systematic voting), and “sympathetic” (voting against resolutions or ignoring them). According to mirror data on foreign trade with Russia, most countries which increased their exports to Russia in 2022 belong to the “sympathizers” group. Relying on the evidence from the EU and China, we demonstrate that imports of sanctioned goods are redistributed more actively than other imports. We list major products which imports were redistributed successfully or unsuccessfully.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"纵身一跃,永不回头":谁留在俄罗斯,进口如何重新分配?
在乌克兰展开特别军事行动和实施大规模制裁后,我们根据各国对俄罗斯的政治态度来考察各国的划分,并利用现有的统计数据说明制裁和对俄罗斯的政治态度对各国对俄罗斯出口的重要性。这些国家都参与了对俄罗斯的制裁,并对谴责俄罗斯行为的六项联合国决议进行了投票。除敌对国家外,我们将友好国家分为三类——“谨慎”(投票支持联合国决议)、“摇摆”(不系统投票)和“同情”(投票反对或无视决议)。根据对俄外贸镜像数据显示,2022年对俄出口增加的国家大多属于“同情者”群体。根据来自欧盟和中国的证据,我们证明了受制裁商品的进口比其他进口更积极地进行了再分配。我们列出了进口再分配成功或失败的主要产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Ekonomiki
Voprosy Ekonomiki ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
Determinants of public spending composition in the Russian regions Soaring public debt: Return of financial repression and high inflation? Knowledge-based view of the firm and the phenomenon of knowledge encapsulation Economic education as a mirror of interdisciplinary discourse Microfoundations of dominance of fundamentalism in economic policy: Is there an antidote?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1