Budget Impact of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® Test in Patients with Early Primary Hormone-Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Node-Positive (pN1) Breast Cancer in Germany

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Care Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1159/000534096
Michael Patrick Lux, C. Minartz, Harald Müller-Huesmann, M. Sandor, S. Radeck-Knorre, Aljoscha Neubauer
{"title":"Budget Impact of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® Test in Patients with Early Primary Hormone-Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Node-Positive (pN1) Breast Cancer in Germany","authors":"Michael Patrick Lux, C. Minartz, Harald Müller-Huesmann, M. Sandor, S. Radeck-Knorre, Aljoscha Neubauer","doi":"10.1159/000534096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: \nGene expression tests can inform decisions on whether to recommend or omit chemotherapy for patients with early HR+, HER2- breast cancer. The benefit of these tests is well established and fully reimbursed by sickness funds for lymph node-negative (pN0) patients in Germany. A budget impact model was built to evaluate the effect of using the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® test also for node-positive (pN1: 1-3 positive lymph nodes) patients.\nMETHODS: \nThe prospective randomized clinical trial, RxPONDER, defined conditions (Recurrence Score result 0-25 for postmenopausal patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes) under which omitting chemotherapy does not significantly impact invasive disease-free survival with results currently reported for 5 years follow-up. The present budget impact model calculates average total cost per node-positive patient versus no testing from a sickness funds perspective, taking into account not only the budgetary impact of avoiding chemotherapy and associated side effects, but also the costs of treating those patients who develop distant metastasis. The stability of the results was investigated by probabilistic multivariate sensitivity analysis.\nRESULTS: \nAfter deducting testing cost, applying the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test yielded an average savings per node-positive patient of 4,272 €. Without the test costs, the greatest savings resulted from reductions in direct treatment costs and costs arising from the treatment of chemotherapy-related side effects, which together averaged 6,677 €. The targeted use of chemotherapy after testing also resulted in slightly lower costs for treatment of distant metastasis, if it did occur. The multivariate sensitivity analysis also almost exclusively resulted in cost savings.\nCONCLUSION: \nAnalogous to the pN0 situation, this budget impact model demonstrates that the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test can also reduce healthcare costs in Germany in treatment of node-positive (pN1: 1-3 positive lymph nodes) patients by minimizing both unnecessary chemotherapy and undertreatment. Additional benefits to patients would include reduced morbidity and improved quality of life for those patients who can safely avoid chemotherapy or undertreatment.","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gene expression tests can inform decisions on whether to recommend or omit chemotherapy for patients with early HR+, HER2- breast cancer. The benefit of these tests is well established and fully reimbursed by sickness funds for lymph node-negative (pN0) patients in Germany. A budget impact model was built to evaluate the effect of using the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® test also for node-positive (pN1: 1-3 positive lymph nodes) patients. METHODS: The prospective randomized clinical trial, RxPONDER, defined conditions (Recurrence Score result 0-25 for postmenopausal patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes) under which omitting chemotherapy does not significantly impact invasive disease-free survival with results currently reported for 5 years follow-up. The present budget impact model calculates average total cost per node-positive patient versus no testing from a sickness funds perspective, taking into account not only the budgetary impact of avoiding chemotherapy and associated side effects, but also the costs of treating those patients who develop distant metastasis. The stability of the results was investigated by probabilistic multivariate sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: After deducting testing cost, applying the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test yielded an average savings per node-positive patient of 4,272 €. Without the test costs, the greatest savings resulted from reductions in direct treatment costs and costs arising from the treatment of chemotherapy-related side effects, which together averaged 6,677 €. The targeted use of chemotherapy after testing also resulted in slightly lower costs for treatment of distant metastasis, if it did occur. The multivariate sensitivity analysis also almost exclusively resulted in cost savings. CONCLUSION: Analogous to the pN0 situation, this budget impact model demonstrates that the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test can also reduce healthcare costs in Germany in treatment of node-positive (pN1: 1-3 positive lymph nodes) patients by minimizing both unnecessary chemotherapy and undertreatment. Additional benefits to patients would include reduced morbidity and improved quality of life for those patients who can safely avoid chemotherapy or undertreatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Oncotype DX 乳房复发评分® 检测对德国早期原发性激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性、结节阳性 (pN1) 乳腺癌患者的预算影响
背景:基因表达测试可以决定早期HR+、HER2-乳腺癌患者是否推荐或不建议化疗。这些检查的好处是公认的,并由德国淋巴结阴性(pN0)患者的疾病基金全额报销。建立了一个预算影响模型来评估使用Oncotype DX乳腺癌复发评分®测试对淋巴结阳性(pN1: 1-3个阳性淋巴结)患者的影响。方法:RxPONDER是一项前瞻性随机临床试验,在确定的条件下(绝经后淋巴结1-3阳性的复发评分结果为0-25),在这些条件下,省略化疗不会显著影响浸润性无病生存,目前报道的结果为5年随访。目前的预算影响模型从疾病基金的角度计算每个淋巴结阳性患者与未检测患者的平均总成本,不仅考虑了避免化疗及其相关副作用的预算影响,还考虑了治疗那些发生远处转移的患者的成本。采用概率多变量敏感性分析考察结果的稳定性。结果:在扣除检测费用后,应用Oncotype DX乳腺癌复发评分测试可为每位淋巴结阳性患者平均节省4272欧元。在不包括检测费用的情况下,最大的节省是直接治疗费用和化疗相关副作用治疗费用的减少,这两项费用合计平均为6 677欧元。如果确实发生了远处转移,检测后靶向化疗的使用也会略微降低治疗费用。多变量敏感性分析也几乎完全导致了成本节约。结论:与pN1情况类似,该预算影响模型表明,Oncotype DX乳腺癌复发评分测试也可以减少德国治疗淋巴结阳性(pN1: 1-3个阳性淋巴结)患者的医疗保健费用,减少不必要的化疗和治疗不足。对患者的额外好处包括降低发病率和改善那些可以安全避免化疗或治疗不足的患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Care
Breast Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Breast Care'' is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that covers all aspects of breast biology. Due to its interdisciplinary perspective, it encompasses articles on basic research, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of malignant diseases of the breast. In addition to presenting current developments in clinical research, the scope of clinical practice is broadened by including articles on relevant legal, financial and economic issues.
期刊最新文献
ASCO 2024: Personal Insights and a Look into the Future from an International Expert Group. Association of Aromatase Inhibitor-Induced Musculoskeletal Symptoms with Central Sensitization-Related Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study. Vitamin D and breast cancer risk: evaluating the association and effective risk reduction Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Nodes Using Low-Cost Dual Dye Technique: Identifying Factors Associated with Adequate False Negative Rate Threshold. Translating Evidence into Practice: A Review of Clinical Practice and Outcomes following the Adoption of an Early Post-Mastectomy Discharge Protocol in a Nigerian Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1