The effect of the ECB’s unconventional monetary policy on systemic risks in the eurozone

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS Voprosy Ekonomiki Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI:10.32609/0042-8736-2023-12-86-102
E. P. Dzhagityan, O. Mukhametov
{"title":"The effect of the ECB’s unconventional monetary policy on systemic risks in the eurozone","authors":"E. P. Dzhagityan, O. Mukhametov","doi":"10.32609/0042-8736-2023-12-86-102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Systemic risks in the framework of central banks’ unconventional monetary policy (UMP) have so far received little attention in the modern economic literature. Based on evidence from the UMP of the European Central Bank (ECB), we contribute to this research area by differentiating systemic risks between materialized systemic risks (financial stress) and their potential level (expected capital shortfall in the banking system during crises). Besides, our paper assesses the asymmetric effects of expansionary and contractionary UMP. The empirical analysis covers the period from 2009 to 2022 and applies structural vector autoregressions with zero and sign constraints on the model parameters. We have found that materialized systemic risks decline in response to expansionary UMP and increase after the ECB’s contractionary measures. Potential systemic risks demonstrate a backlash, and their increase after the expansionary shock outweighs the decrease in response to the contractionary measures in modulus. The research results show the need to combine a long-lasting stimulating UMP together with the tightening measures in ensuring financial stability.","PeriodicalId":45534,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-12-86-102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Systemic risks in the framework of central banks’ unconventional monetary policy (UMP) have so far received little attention in the modern economic literature. Based on evidence from the UMP of the European Central Bank (ECB), we contribute to this research area by differentiating systemic risks between materialized systemic risks (financial stress) and their potential level (expected capital shortfall in the banking system during crises). Besides, our paper assesses the asymmetric effects of expansionary and contractionary UMP. The empirical analysis covers the period from 2009 to 2022 and applies structural vector autoregressions with zero and sign constraints on the model parameters. We have found that materialized systemic risks decline in response to expansionary UMP and increase after the ECB’s contractionary measures. Potential systemic risks demonstrate a backlash, and their increase after the expansionary shock outweighs the decrease in response to the contractionary measures in modulus. The research results show the need to combine a long-lasting stimulating UMP together with the tightening measures in ensuring financial stability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲央行非常规货币政策对欧元区系统性风险的影响
在现代经济学文献中,央行非常规货币政策框架下的系统性风险迄今为止很少受到关注。基于欧洲央行(ECB)非常规货币政策的证据,我们通过区分实体化系统性风险(金融压力)及其潜在水平(危机期间银行体系的预期资本短缺)之间的系统性风险,为这一研究领域做出了贡献。此外,本文还评估了扩张性和收缩性非常规货币政策的不对称效应。实证分析涵盖2009年至2022年期间,并采用对模型参数具有零约束和符号约束的结构向量自回归。我们发现,在采取扩张性非常规货币政策后,实体化系统性风险下降,而在欧洲央行采取紧缩措施后,实体化系统性风险上升。潜在的系统性风险表现出强烈的反弹,它们在扩张性冲击后的增加超过了模量收缩措施的减少。研究结果表明,为确保金融稳定,需要将长期刺激的非常规货币政策与紧缩措施结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Ekonomiki
Voprosy Ekonomiki ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
The world in the maze of sanctions: Ambiguity of empirical evidence How does bank lending affect small and medium-sized businesses? Reform of capital adequacy regulation in the world Islamic banking market Talents and their professors: What and how to teach? Reform of economic education or reform of economic knowledge?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1