Deception aversion, communal norm violation and consumer responses to prosocial initiatives

IF 5.1 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Behavioural Public Policy Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1017/bpp.2023.32
Despoina Alempaki, Andrea Isoni, Daniel Read
{"title":"Deception aversion, communal norm violation and consumer responses to prosocial initiatives","authors":"Despoina Alempaki, Andrea Isoni, Daniel Read","doi":"10.1017/bpp.2023.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Companies face increasing pressure to adopt social responsibility initiatives while simultaneously providing shareholder value. However, consumers may respond negatively to ‘win-win’ initiatives that benefit society while bringing financial gain to the corporation, producing a backlash effect. Previous researchers have attributed this backlash effect to the violation of a communal relationship norm that companies trigger in consumers when communicating their win-win initiatives. We propose the alternative hypothesis that the backlash derives from people's deception aversion. We find evidence supporting deception aversion in three preregistered studies showing that companies are evaluated negatively when their actions differ from those implied by their stated prosocial policy and not, as predicted by the communal norm violation hypothesis, when they merely earn a profit. Our results suggest that companies should not fear that earning a profit from prosocial activities will carry reputational risk, so long as they are transparent.","PeriodicalId":29777,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Public Policy","volume":"113 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2023.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Companies face increasing pressure to adopt social responsibility initiatives while simultaneously providing shareholder value. However, consumers may respond negatively to ‘win-win’ initiatives that benefit society while bringing financial gain to the corporation, producing a backlash effect. Previous researchers have attributed this backlash effect to the violation of a communal relationship norm that companies trigger in consumers when communicating their win-win initiatives. We propose the alternative hypothesis that the backlash derives from people's deception aversion. We find evidence supporting deception aversion in three preregistered studies showing that companies are evaluated negatively when their actions differ from those implied by their stated prosocial policy and not, as predicted by the communal norm violation hypothesis, when they merely earn a profit. Our results suggest that companies should not fear that earning a profit from prosocial activities will carry reputational risk, so long as they are transparent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欺骗厌恶、违反社区规范和消费者对亲社会倡议的反应
企业面临越来越大的压力,需要在提供股东价值的同时采取社会责任举措。然而,消费者可能会对“双赢”的举措做出负面反应,这些举措有利于社会,同时为公司带来经济利益,从而产生反弹效应。之前的研究人员将这种反弹效应归因于公司在传达双赢计划时引发消费者的公共关系规范的违反。我们提出了另一种假设,即这种反弹源于人们对欺骗的厌恶。我们在三个预先注册的研究中发现了支持欺骗厌恶的证据,这些研究表明,当公司的行为不同于其声明的亲社会政策所暗示的行为时,公司会受到负面评价,而不是像公共规范违反假设所预测的那样,当公司仅仅赚取利润时。我们的研究结果表明,企业不应该担心从亲社会活动中获利会带来声誉风险,只要这些活动是透明的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effect of timers and precommitments on handwashing: a randomised controlled trial in a kitchen laboratory Beliefs, observability and donation revision in charitable giving: evidence from an online experiment The paradox of disclosure: shifting policies from revealing to resolving conflicts of interest Harnessing heterogeneity in behavioural research using computational social science Deception aversion, communal norm violation and consumer responses to prosocial initiatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1