Interaction between drinker density and cow social dominance affects drinking behavior

{"title":"Interaction between drinker density and cow social dominance affects drinking behavior","authors":"","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2023-0479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dairy cow welfare and milk production levels can be negatively affected when animals lack access to sufficient amounts of good-quality drinking water. Farms vary greatly in how well they meet this standard. Here, we explored how the interaction between drinker density and social dominance level influenced the drinking behaviors of a group of 40 mid-lactation cows. We recorded cow drinking behavior and competitive outcomes (i.e., number of replacements) at the drinkers during the final 5 d of 2 drinker density treatments, applied successively (12 drinkers, then 4 drinkers available). Four social dominance categories were defined by applying the quartile classification method to the normalized David's score obtained from the low-density treatment data (NormDS values). The high- and low-density treatments used approximately 56 (±16) versus 119 (±31) replacements per drinker per day. Subordinate cows were lighter and younger than dominant cows. Dominant cows drank around 5 L more per day in the low- versus high-density treatment. Furthermore, both drinking rate and daily drinking frequency were higher in the low-density treatment, with the most pronounced differences seen for subordinate cows. In the low-density treatment, mid-subordinate cows shifted their drinking times, visiting the drinkers 1 to 2 h after peak water consumption by the group. The results for the low-density treatment thus indicate that the cows were experiencing more intense competition for water, leading to behavioral responses that were related to social dominance. Our findings underscore the need to more broadly explore the effects of increasing drinker numbers under a variety of rearing conditions to provide farmers with better technical recommendations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910223001394/pdfft?md5=89564919f2b4c447a81df16774e46d42&pid=1-s2.0-S2666910223001394-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910223001394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dairy cow welfare and milk production levels can be negatively affected when animals lack access to sufficient amounts of good-quality drinking water. Farms vary greatly in how well they meet this standard. Here, we explored how the interaction between drinker density and social dominance level influenced the drinking behaviors of a group of 40 mid-lactation cows. We recorded cow drinking behavior and competitive outcomes (i.e., number of replacements) at the drinkers during the final 5 d of 2 drinker density treatments, applied successively (12 drinkers, then 4 drinkers available). Four social dominance categories were defined by applying the quartile classification method to the normalized David's score obtained from the low-density treatment data (NormDS values). The high- and low-density treatments used approximately 56 (±16) versus 119 (±31) replacements per drinker per day. Subordinate cows were lighter and younger than dominant cows. Dominant cows drank around 5 L more per day in the low- versus high-density treatment. Furthermore, both drinking rate and daily drinking frequency were higher in the low-density treatment, with the most pronounced differences seen for subordinate cows. In the low-density treatment, mid-subordinate cows shifted their drinking times, visiting the drinkers 1 to 2 h after peak water consumption by the group. The results for the low-density treatment thus indicate that the cows were experiencing more intense competition for water, leading to behavioral responses that were related to social dominance. Our findings underscore the need to more broadly explore the effects of increasing drinker numbers under a variety of rearing conditions to provide farmers with better technical recommendations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饮酒者密度与奶牛社会优势之间的相互作用影响饮酒行为
如果奶牛无法获得足够的优质饮用水,其福利和产奶量就会受到负面影响。牧场在满足这一标准方面存在很大差异。在此,我们探讨了饮水器密度和社会支配水平之间的相互作用如何影响一组 40 头哺乳中期奶牛的饮水行为。我们记录了奶牛在2种饮酒器密度处理(先是12个饮酒器,后是4个饮酒器)的最后5天中的饮酒行为和竞争结果(即替补数量)。根据低密度处理数据(NormDS值)得到的归一化戴维分数,采用四分位分类法定义了四个社会支配力类别。高密度和低密度处理中,每个饮水器每天分别使用约 56 (±16) 头和 119 (±31) 头替换奶牛。从属母牛比优势母牛体重轻、年龄小。在低密度与高密度处理中,优势牛每天多饮约 5 升水。此外,在低密度处理中,饮酒率和日饮酒次数都更高,从属牛的差异最为明显。在低密度处理中,中从属牛改变了饮水时间,在群体饮水高峰后1到2小时才去饮水器饮水。因此,低密度处理的结果表明,奶牛对水的竞争更加激烈,从而导致了与社会支配地位有关的行为反应。我们的研究结果表明,有必要更广泛地探讨在各种饲养条件下增加饮水器数量的影响,以便为牧场主提供更好的技术建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Hot topic: Influenza A H5N1 virus exhibits a broad host range, including dairy cows Hot topic: Epidemiological and clinical aspects of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 in dairy cattle Hot topic: Avian influenza subtype H5N1 in US dairy—A preliminary dairy foods perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1