Female Genital Mutilation in Different Samples of Egyptian Females and its Medicolegal Implication

Karima Mokhtar, esraa gamal, Ahmed mohamed, Ezz Eldin Shalaby
{"title":"Female Genital Mutilation in Different Samples of Egyptian Females and its Medicolegal Implication","authors":"Karima Mokhtar, esraa gamal, Ahmed mohamed, Ezz Eldin Shalaby","doi":"10.21608/ejfsat.2023.227390.1300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is primarily widespread in certain high-risk countries, including Egypt. It has been reported that FGM practice continues to exist because it is reinforced by customs, culture, beliefs, social pressure, religion, and the assumption that it increases a girl’s chance of marriageability. Objectives: To assess FGM in different places in Egypt regarding its incidence, medicolegal implications, and possible complications. Methods: This is an observational case-control clinical study that was conducted on females recruited consequently from the primary health care center, the Egyptian Ministry of Health, Safe Women Unit, and Gynecological Clinic of Kasr-Alainy University Hospital. The included females were classified into Group 1, the circumcised females (n=256), and Group II, the uncircumcised females (n=250). The participants underwent full history taking and clinical examination. Results: The majority of circumcised females (82%) were circumcised at the age range of 7-14 years. The decision-maker was mostly the mother (61.3%). The circumcision was performed by medical (43%), non-medical (43%), or paramedical (14.1%) persons. There was a statistical significance in the education level and the occupation between the two groups. A statistically significant higher percentage of vaginal dryness, loss of libido, vaginal infection, vaginismus, and dyspareunia was shown in the circumcised females. Conclusion: The decision maker for FGM was mostly the mother. A relatively large proportion of the procedures were performed by medical practitioners. Besides physical harm, psychological harm was encountered in the present study with half of the circumcised females. The educational level seems to be affecting the FGM practice.","PeriodicalId":22435,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences and Applied Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences and Applied Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejfsat.2023.227390.1300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is primarily widespread in certain high-risk countries, including Egypt. It has been reported that FGM practice continues to exist because it is reinforced by customs, culture, beliefs, social pressure, religion, and the assumption that it increases a girl’s chance of marriageability. Objectives: To assess FGM in different places in Egypt regarding its incidence, medicolegal implications, and possible complications. Methods: This is an observational case-control clinical study that was conducted on females recruited consequently from the primary health care center, the Egyptian Ministry of Health, Safe Women Unit, and Gynecological Clinic of Kasr-Alainy University Hospital. The included females were classified into Group 1, the circumcised females (n=256), and Group II, the uncircumcised females (n=250). The participants underwent full history taking and clinical examination. Results: The majority of circumcised females (82%) were circumcised at the age range of 7-14 years. The decision-maker was mostly the mother (61.3%). The circumcision was performed by medical (43%), non-medical (43%), or paramedical (14.1%) persons. There was a statistical significance in the education level and the occupation between the two groups. A statistically significant higher percentage of vaginal dryness, loss of libido, vaginal infection, vaginismus, and dyspareunia was shown in the circumcised females. Conclusion: The decision maker for FGM was mostly the mother. A relatively large proportion of the procedures were performed by medical practitioners. Besides physical harm, psychological harm was encountered in the present study with half of the circumcised females. The educational level seems to be affecting the FGM practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同埃及女性样本中的女性外阴残割及其医学法律意义
背景:女性生殖器切割(FGM)主要在某些高风险国家广泛存在,包括埃及。据报道,残割女性生殖器的做法继续存在,因为习俗、文化、信仰、社会压力、宗教以及认为它可以增加女孩的结婚机会的假设加强了这种做法。目的:评估埃及不同地区女性生殖器切割的发生率、医学意义和可能的并发症。方法:这是一项观察性病例对照临床研究,对从初级卫生保健中心、埃及卫生部、安全妇女部门和卡斯阿拉尼大学医院妇科诊所招募的女性进行研究。纳入的女性分为第1组(256例)和第2组(250例)。所有受试者均接受了完整的病史记录和临床检查。结果:大多数女性(82%)在7-14岁之间行包皮环切术。决策者主要是母亲(61.3%)。包皮环切是由医务人员(43%)、非医务人员(43%)或医务辅助人员(14.1%)实施的。两组在受教育程度、职业方面差异有统计学意义。在做过包皮环切手术的女性中,阴道干燥、性欲减退、阴道感染、阴道痉挛和性交困难的比例在统计上有显著提高。结论:女性生殖器切割的决策者多为母亲。相当大比例的手术是由医生进行的。除了身体上的伤害,在本研究中有一半的割礼女性遭受了心理伤害。教育水平似乎正在影响女性生殖器切割的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE PREVALENCE OF SUICIDAL INTOXICATIONS AMONG CASES PRESENTED TO NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER BEFORE AND DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A COMPARATIVE STUDY MEDICOLEGAL STUDY OF FIREARM DEATHS PRESENTED TO ZEINHOM MORGUE APPLICATION OF FINGERPRINT RIDGE DENSITY FOR AGE AND SEX IDENTIFICATION IN NORTH EGYPTIAN POPULATION Female Genital Mutilation in Different Samples of Egyptian Females and its Medicolegal Implication The Effect of Some Adulterants on Drug Abuse Detection by Immunoassay Test Strips
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1