Evaluation of virtual monochromatic imaging with dual-energy computed tomography of small liver metastases from malignant abdominal tumours: Quantitative and qualitative analyses

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Acta radiologica open Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1177/20584601231220324
Hiroaki Okada, Nozomu Matsunaga, Takahiro Yamamoto, Masato Yamauchi, Kojiro Suzuki
{"title":"Evaluation of virtual monochromatic imaging with dual-energy computed tomography of small liver metastases from malignant abdominal tumours: Quantitative and qualitative analyses","authors":"Hiroaki Okada, Nozomu Matsunaga, Takahiro Yamamoto, Masato Yamauchi, Kojiro Suzuki","doi":"10.1177/20584601231220324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The assessment of small metastatic liver tumours using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has not been fully established. Purpose To assess the effect of low-keV virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) with non-contrast and contrast-enhanced DECT on the qualitative and quantitative image parameters of small liver metastases. Material and methods Two radiologists retrospectively evaluated 92 metastatic liver tumours (5–20 mm) in 32 patients. Non-contrast and contrast-enhanced VMI were reconstructed at seven energy levels (40–100 keV) with 10-keV intervals. Lesion boundary, lesion delineation, image noise, and overall image quality were evaluated using the visual analogue scale. A high subjective score indicates good overall image quality, clear nodal boundaries and delineation, and less noticeable image noise. Subjective scores were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. A quantitative analysis involving the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was performed. Results The lesion boundary was highest at 40 keV and significantly improved during the non-contrast portal venous phase compared to that at higher keV (p < .005). The lesion delineation score was significantly higher at 40 keV and tended to decrease at higher keV. Image noise and overall image quality were rated low at low keV; however, those at 80, 90, and 100 keV were rated the highest (p < .005). The CNR and SNR were highest for non-contrast CT at 100 keV. During the portal venous phase, no significant differences were observed in CNR and SNR at each keV. Conclusion Low-keV imaging using non-contrast and contrast-enhanced DECT is useful for delineating small hepatic metastatic tumours.","PeriodicalId":72063,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601231220324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The assessment of small metastatic liver tumours using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has not been fully established. Purpose To assess the effect of low-keV virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) with non-contrast and contrast-enhanced DECT on the qualitative and quantitative image parameters of small liver metastases. Material and methods Two radiologists retrospectively evaluated 92 metastatic liver tumours (5–20 mm) in 32 patients. Non-contrast and contrast-enhanced VMI were reconstructed at seven energy levels (40–100 keV) with 10-keV intervals. Lesion boundary, lesion delineation, image noise, and overall image quality were evaluated using the visual analogue scale. A high subjective score indicates good overall image quality, clear nodal boundaries and delineation, and less noticeable image noise. Subjective scores were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. A quantitative analysis involving the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was performed. Results The lesion boundary was highest at 40 keV and significantly improved during the non-contrast portal venous phase compared to that at higher keV (p < .005). The lesion delineation score was significantly higher at 40 keV and tended to decrease at higher keV. Image noise and overall image quality were rated low at low keV; however, those at 80, 90, and 100 keV were rated the highest (p < .005). The CNR and SNR were highest for non-contrast CT at 100 keV. During the portal venous phase, no significant differences were observed in CNR and SNR at each keV. Conclusion Low-keV imaging using non-contrast and contrast-enhanced DECT is useful for delineating small hepatic metastatic tumours.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹部恶性肿瘤小肝脏转移的双能计算机断层扫描虚拟单色成像评估:定量和定性分析
背景使用双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)评估小转移性肝肿瘤尚未完全建立。目的探讨低键虚拟单色成像(VMI)与非对比和增强DECT对小肝转移定性和定量影像学参数的影响。材料与方法2名放射科医师回顾性评价32例92例转移性肝肿瘤(5 ~ 20mm)。在7个能级(40-100 keV)以10 keV的间隔重建非对比和增强的VMI。使用视觉模拟量表评估病变边界、病变圈定、图像噪声和整体图像质量。主观评分越高,图像整体质量越好,节点边界和圈定清晰,图像噪声越不明显。主观得分采用Kruskal-Wallis测试进行比较。定量分析包括信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)。结果40kev时病变边界最高,门静脉期病变边界较高keV时明显改善(p < 0.005)。病变描述评分在40kev时显著升高,在更高keV时呈下降趋势。在低keV下,图像噪声和整体图像质量被评为低;而80、90和100 keV的评分最高(p < 0.005)。非对比CT的CNR和SNR在100 keV时最高。在门静脉期,各关键点的CNR和SNR无显著差异。结论低键成像应用于非对比和增强DECT对小肝转移瘤有较好的诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Differential diagnosis between low-risk and high-risk thymoma: Comparison of diagnostic performance of radiologists with and without deep learning model. Computed tomography patterns and clinical outcomes of radiation pneumonitis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Cranial nerves bridging the middle ear and cerebellum causing cerebellar peduncle abscess: A case report. Invasive trigeminal ganglioneuroma: A case report and review of the literature. A case of primary osteosarcoma in the occipital bone: A relatively common tumor in an uncommon location.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1