Attitudes toward water resilience and potential for improvement

IF 4.6 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Global Sustainability Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1017/sus.2023.23
Julia Baird, Gillian Dale, Gary Pickering
{"title":"Attitudes toward water resilience and potential for improvement","authors":"Julia Baird, Gillian Dale, Gary Pickering","doi":"10.1017/sus.2023.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Non-technical summary There is a global water crisis, brought on by human actions. The ways we make decisions about water must transform to solve it. We focused on the attitudes that people in society hold toward water to understand how close or far away we are from a broadly accepted worldview that supports this transformation (what we call ‘water resilience’). We found that, across six countries in the Global South and North, attitudes showed moderate support for water resilience. Many people also showed potential to increase their support. Technical summary Water in the Anthropocene is threatened. Water governance aligned with the complex, dynamic, and uncertain nature of social–ecological systems (a ‘water resilience’ paradigm) is needed, and requires transformative change. We queried the potential for transformative change from the perspective that societal worldviews/paradigms offer an important leverage point for system change. Our study aimed to identify attitudes about water resilience and the extent to which there was potential for greater endorsement of water resilience. We surveyed individuals in six countries using vignettes to determine their level of water resilience endorsement (n = 2649). Overall water resilience endorsement was moderate (M = 2.86 out of 4). In some countries, a vignette related to a personally relevant water issue resulted in higher water resilience endorsement. More than half of the respondents held the potential for greater water resilience endorsement. Those with the greatest potential were younger, had children, considered religion more important, were more likely to live in urban areas, and lived in the same area for 10+ years. These findings provide guidance how to engage with the public (e.g. age-specific or parent-focused framing) to potentially increase societal water resilience endorsement. Social media summary General public in six countries moderately supports water resilience to address the water crisis, with room to improve.","PeriodicalId":36849,"journal":{"name":"Global Sustainability","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2023.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Non-technical summary There is a global water crisis, brought on by human actions. The ways we make decisions about water must transform to solve it. We focused on the attitudes that people in society hold toward water to understand how close or far away we are from a broadly accepted worldview that supports this transformation (what we call ‘water resilience’). We found that, across six countries in the Global South and North, attitudes showed moderate support for water resilience. Many people also showed potential to increase their support. Technical summary Water in the Anthropocene is threatened. Water governance aligned with the complex, dynamic, and uncertain nature of social–ecological systems (a ‘water resilience’ paradigm) is needed, and requires transformative change. We queried the potential for transformative change from the perspective that societal worldviews/paradigms offer an important leverage point for system change. Our study aimed to identify attitudes about water resilience and the extent to which there was potential for greater endorsement of water resilience. We surveyed individuals in six countries using vignettes to determine their level of water resilience endorsement (n = 2649). Overall water resilience endorsement was moderate (M = 2.86 out of 4). In some countries, a vignette related to a personally relevant water issue resulted in higher water resilience endorsement. More than half of the respondents held the potential for greater water resilience endorsement. Those with the greatest potential were younger, had children, considered religion more important, were more likely to live in urban areas, and lived in the same area for 10+ years. These findings provide guidance how to engage with the public (e.g. age-specific or parent-focused framing) to potentially increase societal water resilience endorsement. Social media summary General public in six countries moderately supports water resilience to address the water crisis, with room to improve.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对水复原力的态度和改进潜力
摘要:人类活动导致了全球性的水危机。为了解决这个问题,我们必须改变用水决策的方式。我们关注社会上人们对水的态度,以了解我们与支持这种转变的广泛接受的世界观(我们称之为“水弹性”)有多近或远。我们发现,在全球南方和北方的六个国家中,人们对水复原力的态度表现出适度的支持。许多人也表现出增加支持的潜力。人类世的水受到威胁。需要与社会生态系统的复杂性、动态性和不确定性相一致的水治理(“水恢复力”范式),并且需要变革。我们从社会世界观/范式为系统变革提供重要杠杆点的角度,询问了变革的潜力。我们的研究旨在确定人们对水弹性的态度,以及在多大程度上有可能更大程度地认可水弹性。我们对六个国家的个人进行了调查,使用小插曲来确定他们的水恢复力认可水平(n = 2649)。总体的水恢复力认可是中等的(M = 2.86 / 4)。在一些国家,与个人相关的水问题相关的小插曲导致更高的水恢复力认可。超过一半的受访者认为有可能获得更大的水复原力认可。那些最有潜力的人更年轻,有孩子,认为宗教更重要,更有可能生活在城市地区,并在同一个地区生活了10年以上。这些发现为如何与公众接触提供了指导(例如,针对特定年龄或以父母为中心的框架),以潜在地增加社会对水复原力的认可。六个国家的公众对水复原力的支持程度中等,但仍有改善空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Sustainability
Global Sustainability Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
19
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reassessing the need for carbon dioxide removal: moral implications of alternative climate target pathways Attitudes toward water resilience and potential for improvement Justice in benefitting from carbon removal Ten New Insights in Climate Science 2023/2024 From climate science to climate action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1