Efficacy of Levetiracetam as Add-On Therapy in the Treatment of Seizures in Neonates.

IF 3 Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1159/000535499
Mathies Rondagh, Linda S De Vries, Cacha M P C D Peeters-Scholte, Selma C Tromp, Sylke J Steggerda
{"title":"Efficacy of Levetiracetam as Add-On Therapy in the Treatment of Seizures in Neonates.","authors":"Mathies Rondagh, Linda S De Vries, Cacha M P C D Peeters-Scholte, Selma C Tromp, Sylke J Steggerda","doi":"10.1159/000535499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is no consensus regarding the efficacy of add-on therapy with levetiracetam (LEV) in the treatment of seizures in neonates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of add-on therapy with LEV for achieving &gt;80% seizure reduction after phenobarbital (PB) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of near term neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with EEG-confirmed seizures despite treatment with PB as first-line therapy and using LEV as 2nd-, 3rd- or 4th-line treatment. Antiseizure medication was administered according to national guidelines. All neonates were monitored with 2-channel amplitude-integrated electroencephalography. The total seizure burden in minutes, 2 h before and 4 h after administration of LEV, was calculated using raw EEG. Primary outcome was the efficacy of LEV in achieving &gt;80% seizure reduction. The efficacy of additional midazolam (MDZ) and lidocaine (LDC) was also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 full-term neonates were included. The mean total loading dose of LEV was 40 mg/kg (36-44 mg/kg). Seizure etiology consisted of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (n = 11), hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke (n = 16), central nervous system infection (n = 8), genetic (n = 8), metabolic disorders (n = 3), and unknown (n = 1). Following LEV administration, &gt;80% seizure reduction was observed in 17% (8/47) of neonates, whereas it was 23% (6/26) after MDZ and 92% (23/25) after LDC administration.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although the cumulative loading dose of LEV was low and the group of infants studied was heterogeneous, the efficacy of LEV as add-on therapy for the treatment of seizures in neonates was limited. The highest seizure reduction rate was seen after LDC administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"233-243"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10994567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is no consensus regarding the efficacy of add-on therapy with levetiracetam (LEV) in the treatment of seizures in neonates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of add-on therapy with LEV for achieving >80% seizure reduction after phenobarbital (PB) treatment.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of near term neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with EEG-confirmed seizures despite treatment with PB as first-line therapy and using LEV as 2nd-, 3rd- or 4th-line treatment. Antiseizure medication was administered according to national guidelines. All neonates were monitored with 2-channel amplitude-integrated electroencephalography. The total seizure burden in minutes, 2 h before and 4 h after administration of LEV, was calculated using raw EEG. Primary outcome was the efficacy of LEV in achieving >80% seizure reduction. The efficacy of additional midazolam (MDZ) and lidocaine (LDC) was also calculated.

Results: A total of 47 full-term neonates were included. The mean total loading dose of LEV was 40 mg/kg (36-44 mg/kg). Seizure etiology consisted of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (n = 11), hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke (n = 16), central nervous system infection (n = 8), genetic (n = 8), metabolic disorders (n = 3), and unknown (n = 1). Following LEV administration, >80% seizure reduction was observed in 17% (8/47) of neonates, whereas it was 23% (6/26) after MDZ and 92% (23/25) after LDC administration.

Discussion: Although the cumulative loading dose of LEV was low and the group of infants studied was heterogeneous, the efficacy of LEV as add-on therapy for the treatment of seizures in neonates was limited. The highest seizure reduction rate was seen after LDC administration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左乙拉西坦作为附加疗法治疗新生儿癫痫发作的疗效。
简介:关于左乙拉西坦(LEV)附加疗法治疗新生儿癫痫发作的疗效,目前尚未达成共识。本研究旨在评估在苯巴比妥(PB)治疗后使用左乙拉西坦(LEV)进行附加治疗以实现癫痫发作减少 80% 的疗效:方法:回顾性队列研究,研究对象为新生儿重症监护室收治的近足月新生儿,这些新生儿在接受苯巴比妥一线治疗后仍出现脑电图证实的癫痫发作,并使用LEV作为二线、三线或四线治疗。抗癫痫药物的使用符合国家指导方针。所有新生儿都接受了双通道振幅积分脑电图监测。使用原始脑电图计算服用LEV前2小时和服用LEV后4小时的总发作负荷(以分钟为单位)。主要结果是 LEV 在减少 80% 癫痫发作方面的疗效。此外,还计算了追加咪达唑仑(MDZ)和利多卡因(LDC)的疗效:结果:共纳入了 47 名足月新生儿。结果:共纳入 47 名足月新生儿,LEV 的平均总负荷剂量为 40 毫克/千克(36-44 毫克/千克)。癫痫发作的病因包括缺氧缺血性脑病(11 例)、出血性或缺血性中风(16 例)、中枢神经系统感染(8 例)、遗传(8 例)、代谢紊乱(3 例)和未知(1 例)。使用LEV后,17%(8/47)的新生儿癫痫发作减少了80%,而使用MDZ后减少了23%(6/26),使用LDC后减少了92%(23/25):讨论:尽管LEV的累积负荷剂量较低,且研究的婴儿群体具有异质性,但LEV作为附加疗法治疗新生儿癫痫发作的疗效有限。使用LDC后,癫痫发作减少率最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum. Assessing diagnostic accuracy of a handheld point-of-care device for quantifying neonatal bilirubin levels: the BEAT jaundice @home study. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome - 2025. Healthcare professionals' availability for management of preterm neonates < 29 weeks' gestation in 12 iNeo neonatal networks. Cord clamping time and residual placental blood volume in elective and emergency caesarean sections: an observational multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1