In-Person Social Interactions and Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Exploring the Role of Household Size and Virtual Social Contact Among Midlife and Older Black South African Adults

Nigel Walsh Harriman, Daniel Ohene-Kwofie, Sun Jae Jung, Sabrina Hermosilla, Francesc Xavier Gómez-Olivé, Elyse A Jennings
{"title":"In-Person Social Interactions and Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Exploring the Role of Household Size and Virtual Social Contact Among Midlife and Older Black South African Adults","authors":"Nigel Walsh Harriman, Daniel Ohene-Kwofie, Sun Jae Jung, Sabrina Hermosilla, Francesc Xavier Gómez-Olivé, Elyse A Jennings","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbad175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives The current study investigates how physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased anxiety among a cohort of midlife older Black South African adults and the extent to which household size and virtual social contact modify this association for men and women. Methods We analyze data from a phone survey conducted from July 2021 to March 2022 as part of Health and Aging in Africa: A Longitudinal Study of an INDEPTH Community in South Africa (n=2,080). We employ logistic regression to estimate the association between changes in in-person social interactions and anxiety symptoms and examine whether the association is modified by household size and changes in virtual social contact. We perform analyses separately for women and men. Results Declines in in-person social interactions were associated with increased anxiety for women and men (OR=2.52, p<0.001). For women only, declines were greater for those living in larger households (OR=1.11 p=0.032). Declines were buffered by increased virtual social contact for both women (OR=0.55 p=0.025) and men (OR=0.45 p=0.019). Discussion Although the anxiety symptoms of women and men were similarly impacted by declines in in-person social interaction, the modifying influence of household size is unique to women, likely due to gender-specific social roles. For women, living in larger households may mean greater caregiving burden, exacerbating the detrimental association between physical distancing and anxiety. On the other hand, both women and men may have used virtual means to connect with friends and family living outside their homes, buffering against increased anxiety.","PeriodicalId":501650,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbad175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives The current study investigates how physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased anxiety among a cohort of midlife older Black South African adults and the extent to which household size and virtual social contact modify this association for men and women. Methods We analyze data from a phone survey conducted from July 2021 to March 2022 as part of Health and Aging in Africa: A Longitudinal Study of an INDEPTH Community in South Africa (n=2,080). We employ logistic regression to estimate the association between changes in in-person social interactions and anxiety symptoms and examine whether the association is modified by household size and changes in virtual social contact. We perform analyses separately for women and men. Results Declines in in-person social interactions were associated with increased anxiety for women and men (OR=2.52, p<0.001). For women only, declines were greater for those living in larger households (OR=1.11 p=0.032). Declines were buffered by increased virtual social contact for both women (OR=0.55 p=0.025) and men (OR=0.45 p=0.019). Discussion Although the anxiety symptoms of women and men were similarly impacted by declines in in-person social interaction, the modifying influence of household size is unique to women, likely due to gender-specific social roles. For women, living in larger households may mean greater caregiving burden, exacerbating the detrimental association between physical distancing and anxiety. On the other hand, both women and men may have used virtual means to connect with friends and family living outside their homes, buffering against increased anxiety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间的亲身社交互动和焦虑:探索南非中老年黑人中家庭规模和虚拟社交接触的作用
目的 本研究调查了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,南非黑人中老年人队列中的物理距离与焦虑增加之间的关系,以及家庭规模和虚拟社会接触在多大程度上改变了男性和女性的这种关系。方法 我们分析了 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 3 月进行的电话调查数据,该调查是非洲健康与老龄化研究的一部分:南非 INDEPTH 社区纵向研究》的一部分(n=2,080)。我们采用逻辑回归法来估计人际社交互动的变化与焦虑症状之间的关联,并考察这种关联是否会因家庭规模和虚拟社交接触的变化而改变。我们分别对女性和男性进行了分析。结果 对女性和男性而言,人际交往减少与焦虑增加有关(OR=2.52,p<0.001)。仅就女性而言,生活在大家庭中的女性的焦虑感下降幅度更大(OR=1.11 p=0.032)。对女性(OR=0.55 p=0.025)和男性(OR=0.45 p=0.019)而言,虚拟社会接触的增加可缓冲下降趋势。讨论 虽然女性和男性的焦虑症状受亲身社交减少的影响相似,但家庭规模对女性的影响是独特的,这可能是由于性别特有的社会角色造成的。对于女性来说,生活在人口较多的家庭中可能意味着更大的照顾负担,从而加剧了身体疏远与焦虑之间的不利联系。另一方面,女性和男性都可能利用虚拟手段与居住在家庭以外的亲朋好友联系,从而缓冲焦虑的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Temporary Setback or Lasting Challenge? The Impact of Transient and Persistent Functional disability on later life well-being Context Matters: Internet Usage and Loneliness Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic Worrying Across the Generations: The Impact of Adult Grandchildren’s Problems on Grandparents’ Well-Being The Relationship Between 10-Year Changes in Cognitive Control Beliefs and Cognitive Performance in Middle and Later Adulthood Improving Memory through Better Sleep in Community-dwelling Older Adults: A Tai Chi Intervention Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1