The Relationship Between 10-Year Changes in Cognitive Control Beliefs and Cognitive Performance in Middle and Later Adulthood

Kylie A Schiloski, Margie E Lachman
{"title":"The Relationship Between 10-Year Changes in Cognitive Control Beliefs and Cognitive Performance in Middle and Later Adulthood","authors":"Kylie A Schiloski, Margie E Lachman","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbae155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives The present study used a cross-lagged panel design with longitudinal data to test if there is a reciprocal relationship between cognitive control beliefs and cognition (e.g., executive functioning and episodic memory) over 10-years, whether frequency of engaging in stimulating cognitive activities mediated this relationship, and if these relationships varied by age. Methods Data were collected as part of the second (M2, 2004-05) and third (M3, 2013-14) waves of the Midlife in the United States Study (MIDUS). The analysis sample included 2,532 participants with all variables at M2 and M3. Participants’ ages ranged from 33 to 83 (M=54.92, SD=11.13) at M2. Results There was a reciprocal relationship between cognitive control beliefs and executive functioning. Higher executive functioning was related to greater maintenance of cognitive control beliefs for older, not younger, adults. Higher cognitive control beliefs were related to less decline in executive functioning. Though cognitive control beliefs predicted 10-year changes in episodic memory, the inverse relationship was not supported. Frequency of engaging in stimulating cognitive activities mediated the relationship between executive functioning and 10-year changes in cognitive control beliefs, but not cognitive control beliefs and 10-year changes in cognition. Conclusions Cognitive control beliefs are a promising mechanism to help protect against age-related declines in both executive functioning and episodic memory. Moreover, executive functioning also impacts cognitive control beliefs. Specifically, those with higher executive functioning engage more frequently in stimulating cognitive activities, which helps maintain higher cognitive control beliefs.","PeriodicalId":501650,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives The present study used a cross-lagged panel design with longitudinal data to test if there is a reciprocal relationship between cognitive control beliefs and cognition (e.g., executive functioning and episodic memory) over 10-years, whether frequency of engaging in stimulating cognitive activities mediated this relationship, and if these relationships varied by age. Methods Data were collected as part of the second (M2, 2004-05) and third (M3, 2013-14) waves of the Midlife in the United States Study (MIDUS). The analysis sample included 2,532 participants with all variables at M2 and M3. Participants’ ages ranged from 33 to 83 (M=54.92, SD=11.13) at M2. Results There was a reciprocal relationship between cognitive control beliefs and executive functioning. Higher executive functioning was related to greater maintenance of cognitive control beliefs for older, not younger, adults. Higher cognitive control beliefs were related to less decline in executive functioning. Though cognitive control beliefs predicted 10-year changes in episodic memory, the inverse relationship was not supported. Frequency of engaging in stimulating cognitive activities mediated the relationship between executive functioning and 10-year changes in cognitive control beliefs, but not cognitive control beliefs and 10-year changes in cognition. Conclusions Cognitive control beliefs are a promising mechanism to help protect against age-related declines in both executive functioning and episodic memory. Moreover, executive functioning also impacts cognitive control beliefs. Specifically, those with higher executive functioning engage more frequently in stimulating cognitive activities, which helps maintain higher cognitive control beliefs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知控制信念的 10 年变化与中后期认知表现之间的关系
目的 本研究采用交叉滞后面板设计和纵向数据,以检验认知控制信念与认知能力(如执行功能和外显记忆)之间在 10 年内是否存在相互关系,参与刺激性认知活动的频率是否对这种关系起中介作用,以及这些关系是否因年龄而异。方法 数据收集于美国中年研究(MIDUS)的第二波(M2,2004-05 年)和第三波(M3,2013-14 年)。分析样本包括 2,532 名参与者,所有变量均为 M2 和 M3。在 M2 阶段,参与者的年龄从 33 岁到 83 岁不等(M=54.92,SD=11.13)。结果 认知控制信念与执行功能之间存在相互关系。对于老年人而非年轻人来说,较高的执行功能与较强的认知控制信念的维持有关。认知控制信念越高,执行功能下降越少。虽然认知控制信念预示着10年后外显记忆的变化,但反向关系并不成立。参与刺激性认知活动的频率能调节执行功能与认知控制信念10年变化之间的关系,但不能调节认知控制信念与认知10年变化之间的关系。结论 认知控制信念是一种很有希望的机制,有助于防止与年龄有关的执行功能和外显记忆的衰退。此外,执行功能也会影响认知控制信念。具体来说,执行功能较强的人更频繁地参与刺激性认知活动,这有助于维持较高的认知控制信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Temporary Setback or Lasting Challenge? The Impact of Transient and Persistent Functional disability on later life well-being Context Matters: Internet Usage and Loneliness Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic Worrying Across the Generations: The Impact of Adult Grandchildren’s Problems on Grandparents’ Well-Being The Relationship Between 10-Year Changes in Cognitive Control Beliefs and Cognitive Performance in Middle and Later Adulthood Improving Memory through Better Sleep in Community-dwelling Older Adults: A Tai Chi Intervention Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1