Elham Ramin , Antonio Gaetano Cardillo , Reinhard Liebers , Johannes Schmölder , Eric von Lieres , Wim Van Molle , Bastian Niebel , Laurent Natalis , Irina Meln , Mónica Perea-Vélez , Didier Clénet , John Bagterp Jørgensen , Bernt Nilsson , Daniel G. Bracewell , Krist V. Gernaey
{"title":"Accelerating vaccine manufacturing development through model-based approaches: current advances and future opportunities","authors":"Elham Ramin , Antonio Gaetano Cardillo , Reinhard Liebers , Johannes Schmölder , Eric von Lieres , Wim Van Molle , Bastian Niebel , Laurent Natalis , Irina Meln , Mónica Perea-Vélez , Didier Clénet , John Bagterp Jørgensen , Bernt Nilsson , Daniel G. Bracewell , Krist V. Gernaey","doi":"10.1016/j.coche.2023.100998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This review highlights the importance of model-based approaches in accelerating vaccine manufacturing process development. The challenges of scaling up from laboratory to commercial processes are addressed through the adoption of Process Analytical Technology frameworks and Quality by Design principles. The application of various modeling approaches beyond downstream and upstream processes in vaccine production is discussed in detail. These <em>in silico</em> process simulation approaches enable deeper understanding of manufacturing dynamics, identification of critical process parameters, and the development of well-defined design spaces, ultimately leading to accelerated vaccine development and improved product quality. The authors stress the significance of an integrated modeling platform for vaccine manufacturing, exemplified by the Inno4Vac project. This initiative seeks to develop a comprehensive computational platform for vaccine manufacturing and stability testing, with a particular focus on stakeholder engagement and collaboration with regulatory bodies to ensure the acceptance and implementation of the platform.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":292,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100998"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211339823001028/pdfft?md5=8912efbf49b42c4922d008ee79d2f9b5&pid=1-s2.0-S2211339823001028-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211339823001028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This review highlights the importance of model-based approaches in accelerating vaccine manufacturing process development. The challenges of scaling up from laboratory to commercial processes are addressed through the adoption of Process Analytical Technology frameworks and Quality by Design principles. The application of various modeling approaches beyond downstream and upstream processes in vaccine production is discussed in detail. These in silico process simulation approaches enable deeper understanding of manufacturing dynamics, identification of critical process parameters, and the development of well-defined design spaces, ultimately leading to accelerated vaccine development and improved product quality. The authors stress the significance of an integrated modeling platform for vaccine manufacturing, exemplified by the Inno4Vac project. This initiative seeks to develop a comprehensive computational platform for vaccine manufacturing and stability testing, with a particular focus on stakeholder engagement and collaboration with regulatory bodies to ensure the acceptance and implementation of the platform.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering is devoted to bringing forth short and focused review articles written by experts on current advances in different areas of chemical engineering. Only invited review articles will be published.
The goals of each review article in Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering are:
1. To acquaint the reader/researcher with the most important recent papers in the given topic.
2. To provide the reader with the views/opinions of the expert in each topic.
The reviews are short (about 2500 words or 5-10 printed pages with figures) and serve as an invaluable source of information for researchers, teachers, professionals and students. The reviews also aim to stimulate exchange of ideas among experts.
Themed sections:
Each review will focus on particular aspects of one of the following themed sections of chemical engineering:
1. Nanotechnology
2. Energy and environmental engineering
3. Biotechnology and bioprocess engineering
4. Biological engineering (covering tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, drug delivery)
5. Separation engineering (covering membrane technologies, adsorbents, desalination, distillation etc.)
6. Materials engineering (covering biomaterials, inorganic especially ceramic materials, nanostructured materials).
7. Process systems engineering
8. Reaction engineering and catalysis.