Evaluation of the effect of constant and non-constant Poisson’s ratio on reinforcement load of reinforced soil walls

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Soils and Foundations Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.sandf.2023.101409
Mauricio Ehrlich , Seyed Hamed Mirmoradi , Gustavo Fonseca Silva , Gabriel Nascimento
{"title":"Evaluation of the effect of constant and non-constant Poisson’s ratio on reinforcement load of reinforced soil walls","authors":"Mauricio Ehrlich ,&nbsp;Seyed Hamed Mirmoradi ,&nbsp;Gustavo Fonseca Silva ,&nbsp;Gabriel Nascimento","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2023.101409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study analytically and numerically investigates the impact of constant and non-constant Poisson’s ratio on the mobilized maximum load in the reinforcements, T<sub>max</sub>, of reinforced soil walls with vertical facing under working stress conditions. This assessment is carried out considering different controlling factors including reinforcement stiffness, wall height, backfill friction angle, and compaction-induced stress. The analytical procedure and the numerical model are validated against data from an instrumented, large-scale, geosynthetic-reinforced soil wall under working stress conditions. Considering the key factors evaluated in the current study, the results show that the impact of the reinforcement stiffness is dominant over the approach used to consider Poisson’s ratio. A maximum difference of about 20% was obtained between the values of T<sub>max</sub> calculated using constant and variable Poisson’s ratios. This implies that, from a practical standpoint, it may be appropriate to adopt a simpler approach that utilizes a constant Poisson's ratio for the determination of T<sub>max</sub> under operational conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080623001385/pdfft?md5=2d83a54ec5823360d4ca31671a663e95&pid=1-s2.0-S0038080623001385-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080623001385","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analytically and numerically investigates the impact of constant and non-constant Poisson’s ratio on the mobilized maximum load in the reinforcements, Tmax, of reinforced soil walls with vertical facing under working stress conditions. This assessment is carried out considering different controlling factors including reinforcement stiffness, wall height, backfill friction angle, and compaction-induced stress. The analytical procedure and the numerical model are validated against data from an instrumented, large-scale, geosynthetic-reinforced soil wall under working stress conditions. Considering the key factors evaluated in the current study, the results show that the impact of the reinforcement stiffness is dominant over the approach used to consider Poisson’s ratio. A maximum difference of about 20% was obtained between the values of Tmax calculated using constant and variable Poisson’s ratios. This implies that, from a practical standpoint, it may be appropriate to adopt a simpler approach that utilizes a constant Poisson's ratio for the determination of Tmax under operational conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估恒定和非恒定泊松比对加固土墙加固荷载的影响
本研究通过分析和数值方法研究了在工作应力条件下,恒定和非恒定泊松比对竖向加筋土墙钢筋中的最大动员荷载 Tmax 的影响。该评估考虑了不同的控制因素,包括钢筋刚度、墙体高度、回填摩擦角和压实引起的应力。在工作应力条件下,分析程序和数字模型通过仪器测量的大型土工合成材料加固土墙的数据进行了验证。考虑到当前研究中评估的关键因素,结果表明加固刚度的影响比考虑泊松比的方法更重要。使用恒定泊松比和可变泊松比计算的 Tmax 值之间的最大差异约为 20%。这意味着,从实用的角度来看,采用一种更简单的方法,即利用恒定泊松比来确定工作条件下的 Tmax 可能是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soils and Foundations
Soils and Foundations 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020. Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.
期刊最新文献
Pseudo-dynamic bearing capacity of strip foundations on rock masses considering the Rayleigh surface waves Effect of silt uniformity on the liquefaction resistance of sand–silt mixtures Elastoplastic finite element simulation of domino fault formation associated with tilting of highly structured ground Improved SfM-MVS approach using artificial backgrounds Soil-water-air coupled finite deformation analysis considering trapped air and continuous air phases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1