A pilot recruitment strategy to enhance ethical and equitable access to Covid-19 pediatric vaccine trials.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical Trials Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-23 DOI:10.1177/17407745231217299
William J Muller, Ravi Jhaveri, Taylor Heald-Sargent, Michelle L Macy, Nia Heard-Garris, Seema Shah, Erin Paquette
{"title":"A pilot recruitment strategy to enhance ethical and equitable access to Covid-19 pediatric vaccine trials.","authors":"William J Muller, Ravi Jhaveri, Taylor Heald-Sargent, Michelle L Macy, Nia Heard-Garris, Seema Shah, Erin Paquette","doi":"10.1177/17407745231217299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic disproportionately impacted communities with lower access to health care in the United States, particularly before vaccines were widely available. These same communities are often underrepresented in clinical trials. Efforts to ensure equitable enrollment of participants in trials related to treatment and prevention of Covid-19 can raise concerns about exploitation if communities with lower access to health care are targeted for recruitment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To enhance equity while avoiding exploitation, our site developed and implemented a three-part recruitment strategy for pediatric Covid-19 vaccine studies. First, we publicized a registry for potentially interested participants. Next, we applied public health community and social vulnerability indices to categorize the residence of families who had signed up for the registry into three levels to reflect the relative impact of the pandemic on their community: high, medium, and low. Finally, we preferentially offered study participation to interested families living in areas categorized by these indices as having high impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on their community.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This approach allowed us to meet goals for study recruitment based on public health metrics related to disease burden, which contributed to a racially diverse study population that mirrored the surrounding community demographics. While this three-part recruitment strategy improved representation of minoritized groups from areas heavily impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic, important limitations were identified that would benefit from further study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future use of this approach to enhance equitable access to research while avoiding exploitation should test different methods to build trust and communicate with underserved communities more effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":10685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745231217299","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic disproportionately impacted communities with lower access to health care in the United States, particularly before vaccines were widely available. These same communities are often underrepresented in clinical trials. Efforts to ensure equitable enrollment of participants in trials related to treatment and prevention of Covid-19 can raise concerns about exploitation if communities with lower access to health care are targeted for recruitment.

Methods: To enhance equity while avoiding exploitation, our site developed and implemented a three-part recruitment strategy for pediatric Covid-19 vaccine studies. First, we publicized a registry for potentially interested participants. Next, we applied public health community and social vulnerability indices to categorize the residence of families who had signed up for the registry into three levels to reflect the relative impact of the pandemic on their community: high, medium, and low. Finally, we preferentially offered study participation to interested families living in areas categorized by these indices as having high impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on their community.

Results: This approach allowed us to meet goals for study recruitment based on public health metrics related to disease burden, which contributed to a racially diverse study population that mirrored the surrounding community demographics. While this three-part recruitment strategy improved representation of minoritized groups from areas heavily impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic, important limitations were identified that would benefit from further study.

Conclusion: Future use of this approach to enhance equitable access to research while avoiding exploitation should test different methods to build trust and communicate with underserved communities more effectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项试点招募战略,旨在提高 Covid-19 儿科疫苗试验的道德性和公平性。
背景/目的:在美国,SARS-CoV-2 大流行对获得医疗保健机会较少的社区造成了极大的影响,尤其是在疫苗普及之前。这些社区在临床试验中的代表性往往不足。如果招募的对象是医疗条件较差的社区,那么为确保与治疗和预防 Covid-19 相关的试验参与者的公平招募所做的努力可能会引发对剥削的担忧:为了在避免剥削的同时提高公平性,我们的研究机构为儿科 Covid-19 疫苗研究制定并实施了由三部分组成的招募策略。首先,我们对可能感兴趣的参与者进行登记。接下来,我们运用公共卫生社区和社会脆弱性指数将报名参加登记的家庭的居住地分为三个等级,以反映大流行病对其社区的相对影响:高、中、低。最后,我们优先让居住在被这些指数归类为 Covid-19 大流行对其社区影响较大的地区的感兴趣的家庭参与研究:结果:这种方法使我们达到了根据与疾病负担相关的公共卫生指标进行研究招募的目标,从而使研究人群具有种族多样性,与周围社区的人口构成相一致。虽然这种由三部分组成的招募策略提高了受 Covid-19 大流行影响严重地区的少数民族群体的代表性,但也发现了一些重要的局限性,这些局限性将受益于进一步的研究:结论:未来使用这种方法来提高公平参与研究的机会,同时避免剥削,应该测试不同的方法来建立信任,并与服务不足的社区进行更有效的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Trials
Clinical Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Trials is dedicated to advancing knowledge on the design and conduct of clinical trials related research methodologies. Covering the design, conduct, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of key methodologies, the journal remains on the cusp of the latest topics, including ethics, regulation and policy impact.
期刊最新文献
Proceedings of the University of Pennsylvania 15th annual conference on statistical issues in clinical trials: Advances in time-to-event analyses in clinical trials-challenges and opportunities. Participant’s treatment guesses and adverse events in back pain trials: Nocebo in action? 15th Annual University of Pennsylvania conference on statistical issues in clinical trial/advances in time to event analyses in clinical trials (morning panel discussion). Estimands in clinical trials of complex disease processes. Commentary on Astrachan et al. The transmutation of research risk in pragmatic clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1