DOES CONFORMITY REALLY EXIST? EXAMINATION OF INFORMATIONAL SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE RECOGNITION OF THE COLOR ORDER

Milica Đorđević, Nebojša Milićević
{"title":"DOES CONFORMITY REALLY EXIST? EXAMINATION OF INFORMATIONAL SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE RECOGNITION OF THE COLOR ORDER","authors":"Milica Đorđević, Nebojša Milićević","doi":"10.46630/gpsi.20.2023.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines the informational social influence in situations involving the recognition of the color order. Also, this study examines the differences in selection of the stimuli between the two measures: in the first measure there was no answer from the artist, and in the second, there was. The sample consists of 50 subjects, ages 18 to 65 years (M = 41.5, SD = 15.8). In the first phase, the subjects were shown standard stimuli lasting 1 second, and their task was to remember them and then recognize them among the four offered examples that they were exposed to for 3 seconds. The second phase was identical to the first, and the only difference was the presence of a response given by the artist. The results show that 23% cases were influenced by conformity. The analysis of the subject’s responses to the variable “stimulus selection” shows that there is a statistically significant difference in the average selection of stimuli between the situation with and without the artist’s response (t(49) = -3.06, p = .004, d = -0.432). A negative t-test value shows that subjects would choose the stimulus that the artist marked as correct more often in the situation when it is listed. Further research is recommended that would include the use of a more homogeneous sample in terms of age, the use of experimenter associates and insisting on the personal importance of the involvement of research participants.","PeriodicalId":272628,"journal":{"name":"ГОДИШЊАК ЗА ПСИХОЛОГИЈУ","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ГОДИШЊАК ЗА ПСИХОЛОГИЈУ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46630/gpsi.20.2023.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examines the informational social influence in situations involving the recognition of the color order. Also, this study examines the differences in selection of the stimuli between the two measures: in the first measure there was no answer from the artist, and in the second, there was. The sample consists of 50 subjects, ages 18 to 65 years (M = 41.5, SD = 15.8). In the first phase, the subjects were shown standard stimuli lasting 1 second, and their task was to remember them and then recognize them among the four offered examples that they were exposed to for 3 seconds. The second phase was identical to the first, and the only difference was the presence of a response given by the artist. The results show that 23% cases were influenced by conformity. The analysis of the subject’s responses to the variable “stimulus selection” shows that there is a statistically significant difference in the average selection of stimuli between the situation with and without the artist’s response (t(49) = -3.06, p = .004, d = -0.432). A negative t-test value shows that subjects would choose the stimulus that the artist marked as correct more often in the situation when it is listed. Further research is recommended that would include the use of a more homogeneous sample in terms of age, the use of experimenter associates and insisting on the personal importance of the involvement of research participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一致性真的存在吗?考察信息社会对色彩秩序认知的影响
本研究探讨了在涉及识别颜色顺序的情境中信息社会的影响。此外,本研究还考察了两种测量在刺激物选择上的差异:在第一种测量中,艺术家没有给出答案,而在第二种测量中,艺术家给出了答案。样本由 50 名年龄在 18 岁至 65 岁之间的受试者组成(男 = 41.5,女 = 15.8)。在第一阶段,受试者会看到持续 1 秒钟的标准刺激,他们的任务是记住这些刺激,然后在 3 秒钟内从四个提供的例子中识别出这些刺激。第二阶段与第一阶段完全相同,唯一的区别是艺术家是否做出了回应。结果显示,23% 的案例受到了一致性的影响。对受试者对变量 "刺激选择 "的反应进行的分析表明,在有艺术家回应和没有艺术家回应的情况下,受试者对刺激的平均选择有显著的统计学差异(t(49) = -3.06,p = .004,d = -0.432)。负 t 检验值表明,在列出艺术家标记为正确的刺激物的情况下,受试者会更多地选择该刺激物。建议进一步开展研究,包括使用年龄更均匀的样本、使用实验者助手以及坚持研究参与者参与的个人重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DOES CONFORMITY REALLY EXIST? EXAMINATION OF INFORMATIONAL SOCIAL INFLUENCE IN THE RECOGNITION OF THE COLOR ORDER EXPLORING THE HORIZON OF SCIENCE: A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO AI ETHICS METHODOLOGICAL CORRECTNESS OF RESEARCH IN MEASURING IMPLICIT ATTITUDES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW THE ROLE OF EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF EMPLOYEES AND PEOPLE-ORIENTED LEADERSHIP IN PERCEIVING PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY IN ORGANIZATIONS POSSIBILITIES OF APPLICATION OF MUSICAL INTERVENTIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1