Aquifer Management Establishing a Tradable Water Rights System: The Effect of Natural Discharge and Salinity

Athanasios Tsiarapas, Zisis Mallios
{"title":"Aquifer Management Establishing a Tradable Water Rights System: The Effect of Natural Discharge and Salinity","authors":"Athanasios Tsiarapas, Zisis Mallios","doi":"10.5755/j01.erem.79.4.33795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economic instruments such as tradable water rights systems have been proposed as cost-effective methods for managing groundwater. The relevant literature shows that the majority of the relevant studies do not consider aquifer’s natural discharge, which is expected to have a significant impact on the determination of the optimal groundwater management policy. This paper attempts to highlight the impact of considering natural discharge in the formulation of groundwater management policies. Thus, two different cases of aquifer management are considered and the corresponding time-dynamic problems are solved by considering natural discharge in order to derive optimal trajectories for a number of key variables. These cases are (1) non-intervention – full competition and (2) intervention with a tradable water rights system. The results obtained from simulations on a coastal aquifer show that indeed not considering the natural discharge leads to an overestimation of the benefits from groundwater consumption that can reach 5.79% in the case of non-intervention and in the case of intervention with a tradable water rights system. ","PeriodicalId":11703,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research, Engineering and Management","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research, Engineering and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.79.4.33795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Economic instruments such as tradable water rights systems have been proposed as cost-effective methods for managing groundwater. The relevant literature shows that the majority of the relevant studies do not consider aquifer’s natural discharge, which is expected to have a significant impact on the determination of the optimal groundwater management policy. This paper attempts to highlight the impact of considering natural discharge in the formulation of groundwater management policies. Thus, two different cases of aquifer management are considered and the corresponding time-dynamic problems are solved by considering natural discharge in order to derive optimal trajectories for a number of key variables. These cases are (1) non-intervention – full competition and (2) intervention with a tradable water rights system. The results obtained from simulations on a coastal aquifer show that indeed not considering the natural discharge leads to an overestimation of the benefits from groundwater consumption that can reach 5.79% in the case of non-intervention and in the case of intervention with a tradable water rights system. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
含水层管理:建立可交易水权制度:天然排水和盐度的影响
可交易水权制度等经济手段已被提出作为管理地下水的具有成本效益的方法。相关文献表明,大多数相关研究没有考虑含水层的自然排泄量,而自然排泄量预计会对确定最佳地下水管理政策产生重大影响。本文试图强调在制定地下水管理政策时考虑自然排泄量的影响。因此,本文考虑了含水层管理的两种不同情况,并通过考虑自然排泄量来解决相应的时间动态问题,从而得出一些关键变量的最优轨迹。这两种情况是:(1) 非干预--充分竞争;(2) 干预--可交易水权制度。对沿海含水层的模拟结果表明,不考虑自然排泄量确实会导致高估地下水消耗所带来的收益,在不干预的情况下和在采用可交易水权制度进行干预的情况下,高估的收益可达 5.79%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Research, Engineering and Management
Environmental Research, Engineering and Management Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: First published in 1995, the journal Environmental Research, Engineering and Management (EREM) is an international multidisciplinary journal designed to serve as a roadmap for understanding complex issues and debates of sustainable development. EREM publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers which cover research in the fields of environmental science, engineering (pollution prevention, resource efficiency), management, energy (renewables), agricultural and biological sciences, and social sciences. EREM’s topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following: environmental research, ecological monitoring, and climate change; environmental pollution – impact assessment, mitigation, and prevention; environmental engineering, sustainable production, and eco innovations; environmental management, strategy, standards, social responsibility; environmental economics, policy, and law; sustainable consumption and education.
期刊最新文献
Challenge of Rainfall Uncertainty in the Study of Deficit Irrigation A Study on Heavy Metal Contamination of Yard Soils and its Remediation Potential by Weedy Species Performance Investigation of Surface Modified Ceramic Microfiltration Membranes of Ionic Water Treatment Production of Xanthan Gum from Inedible Parts of Broccoli and Cauliflower Assessment of Household Waste Generation and Management in Rural Areas: A Case Study in Ha Nam Province, Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1