Permeability of sandy soils estimated from particle size distribution and field measurements

IF 1.1 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Archives of Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.24425/ace.2023.147655
Anna Wioletta Gorczewska-Langner, Beata Gumuła-Kawęcka, Rafael Jaworska-Szulc, Adam Angulo-Jaramillo, Szymkiewicz, Wioletta Gorczewska-Langner, Anna Gumuła-Kawęcka, Beata Jaworska-Szulc, Rafael Angulo-Jaramillo, A. Szymkiewicz
{"title":"Permeability of sandy soils estimated from particle size distribution and field measurements","authors":"Anna Wioletta Gorczewska-Langner, Beata Gumuła-Kawęcka, Rafael Jaworska-Szulc, Adam Angulo-Jaramillo, Szymkiewicz, Wioletta Gorczewska-Langner, Anna Gumuła-Kawęcka, Beata Jaworska-Szulc, Rafael Angulo-Jaramillo, A. Szymkiewicz","doi":"10.24425/ace.2023.147655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Accurate estimation of soil permeability is crucial in many geotechnical applications. Empirical and theoretical equations based on soil particle size distribution (PSD) offer a fast and cheap way for preliminary estimation of permeability in granular soils, however the results obtained from various formulas available in the literature often show significant discrepancies. While several comparative studies on this topic have been published, no definite conclusions can be drawn on the performance of the predictive equations in comparison with in-situ permeability measurements. Many formulas require porosity or void ratio as input parameter, which is difficult to obtain for granular soil in-situ. In this study we applied 30 predictive equations to estimate permeability of sandy soil in an outwash plain deposit. The equations were divided into 5 groups, based on their structure and the required input parameters. Empirical formulas were used to estimate the expected in-situ porosity range. The obtained permeability values were compared to the results of in-situ permeameter measurements and pumping tests. Significant differences in the results and in their sensitivity to porosity were found between the 5 groups of methods. In general, simple equations which do not include porosity were in better agreement with measurements than the other groups.","PeriodicalId":45753,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2023.147655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Accurate estimation of soil permeability is crucial in many geotechnical applications. Empirical and theoretical equations based on soil particle size distribution (PSD) offer a fast and cheap way for preliminary estimation of permeability in granular soils, however the results obtained from various formulas available in the literature often show significant discrepancies. While several comparative studies on this topic have been published, no definite conclusions can be drawn on the performance of the predictive equations in comparison with in-situ permeability measurements. Many formulas require porosity or void ratio as input parameter, which is difficult to obtain for granular soil in-situ. In this study we applied 30 predictive equations to estimate permeability of sandy soil in an outwash plain deposit. The equations were divided into 5 groups, based on their structure and the required input parameters. Empirical formulas were used to estimate the expected in-situ porosity range. The obtained permeability values were compared to the results of in-situ permeameter measurements and pumping tests. Significant differences in the results and in their sensitivity to porosity were found between the 5 groups of methods. In general, simple equations which do not include porosity were in better agreement with measurements than the other groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据粒径分布和实地测量估算砂土的渗透性
:在许多岩土工程应用中,准确估算土壤渗透性至关重要。基于土壤粒度分布 (PSD) 的经验和理论方程为初步估算粒状土的渗透性提供了一种快速而廉价的方法,但文献中的各种公式得出的结果往往存在显著差异。虽然已经发表了一些相关的比较研究,但对于预测公式与现场渗透性测量结果的性能比较,还不能得出明确的结论。许多公式都需要孔隙度或空隙率作为输入参数,而这对于原位颗粒土来说很难获得。在这项研究中,我们应用了 30 个预测方程来估算冲积平原沉积物中砂质土壤的渗透性。这些方程根据其结构和所需输入参数分为 5 组。经验公式用于估算预期的原位孔隙度范围。获得的渗透率值与原位渗透仪测量和抽水试验的结果进行了比较。发现五组方法的结果及其对孔隙度的敏感性存在显著差异。一般来说,不包含孔隙度的简单方程与测量结果的一致性要好于其他组别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Civil Engineering
Archives of Civil Engineering ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: ARCHIVES OF CIVIL ENGINEERING publish original papers of the theoretical, experimental, numerical and practical nature in the fields of structural mechanics, soil mechanics and foundations engineering, concrete, metal, timber and composite polymer structures, hydrotechnical structures, roads, railways and bridges, building services, building physics, management in construction, production of construction materials, construction of civil engineering structures, education of civil engineers.
期刊最新文献
Determining the trend of geometrical changes of a hydrotechnical object based on data in the form of LiDAR point clouds A study on time schedules for construction projects in Hanoi, Vietnam Study on failure modes and calculation method of the cast steel joint with branches in treelike structure Prediction of CPTu static sounding parameters based on DPH dynamic probing heavy test on the example of “the Praski terrace” sands inWarsaw title Application of the interval approach to determine the exploitation time of pipelines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1