Validity and reliability testing of the questionnaire used to finalize criteria for the evaluation of the contractor’s performance

IF 1 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Archives of Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.24425/ace.2023.147671
Sunil Mahadik, Vinay Topkar
{"title":"Validity and reliability testing of the questionnaire used to finalize criteria for the evaluation of the contractor’s performance","authors":"Sunil Mahadik, Vinay Topkar","doi":"10.24425/ace.2023.147671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The paper aims to determine the criteria and sub-criteria for evaluating the contractor’s performanceandfinalizeamasterlistofthecriteriaandsub-criteriatobeusedforevaluatingcontractor’s performancewiththeirrespectiveweights.Themethodisincorporatedintheframeworkproposedfortheevaluationofthecontractor’sperformanceduringtheexecutionphase.Anexploratorystudy hasbeenopted,usingastructured,close-endedmultiple-choicequestionnairesurveyapproach.Thequestionnairesurveywasconductedintwophases,i.e.validationsurvey,andreliabilitysurvey.Fifteen expertsrespondedtothevalidationsurvey,andthirtyexpertstothereliabilitysurvey.TheexpertswerefromGovernmentandpublicsectorsinIndia,workingatvariousseniorlevels.Theweightsofcriteria andsub-criteriawerecalculatedfromdatacollectedinthesurvey,relativeimportancewascalculatedthroughtherelativeimportanceindexandcriteriawereranked.Thepaperprovidescriteriaandsub-criteriawhichwerefinalizedthroughaquestionnairesurveybyclassificationofcriteriaidentifiedinliteratureandtenderreview.Therespectiveweightswerefinalized,whichcanbemeasuredwhile evaluatingcontractors’performance.Theweightsassignedtocriteriathroughthesurveyare;healthandsafetyis13.19%,followedbyfinance11.93%,time11.93%,quality13.38%,clientsatisfaction 12.42%, environmental safety 12.32%, productivity 12.51% and regulation 12.32%. The paper provides the criteria and sub-criteria with their weights needed for evaluating the performance of contractors during the project execution phase. This research can lead to a culture of continuous measurement of performance for the satisfactory completion of projects.","PeriodicalId":45753,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Civil Engineering","volume":"56 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2023.147671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The paper aims to determine the criteria and sub-criteria for evaluating the contractor’s performanceandfinalizeamasterlistofthecriteriaandsub-criteriatobeusedforevaluatingcontractor’s performancewiththeirrespectiveweights.Themethodisincorporatedintheframeworkproposedfortheevaluationofthecontractor’sperformanceduringtheexecutionphase.Anexploratorystudy hasbeenopted,usingastructured,close-endedmultiple-choicequestionnairesurveyapproach.Thequestionnairesurveywasconductedintwophases,i.e.validationsurvey,andreliabilitysurvey.Fifteen expertsrespondedtothevalidationsurvey,andthirtyexpertstothereliabilitysurvey.TheexpertswerefromGovernmentandpublicsectorsinIndia,workingatvariousseniorlevels.Theweightsofcriteria andsub-criteriawerecalculatedfromdatacollectedinthesurvey,relativeimportancewascalculatedthroughtherelativeimportanceindexandcriteriawereranked.Thepaperprovidescriteriaandsub-criteriawhichwerefinalizedthroughaquestionnairesurveybyclassificationofcriteriaidentifiedinliteratureandtenderreview.Therespectiveweightswerefinalized,whichcanbemeasuredwhile evaluatingcontractors’performance.Theweightsassignedtocriteriathroughthesurveyare;healthandsafetyis13.19%,followedbyfinance11.93%,time11.93%,quality13.38%,clientsatisfaction 12.42%, environmental safety 12.32%, productivity 12.51% and regulation 12.32%. The paper provides the criteria and sub-criteria with their weights needed for evaluating the performance of contractors during the project execution phase. This research can lead to a culture of continuous measurement of performance for the satisfactory completion of projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对用于最终确定承包商业绩评估标准的调查表进行有效性和可靠性测试
:本文旨在确定评价承包商绩效的标准和次级标准,并最终确定用于评价承包商绩效的标准和次级标准及其各自权重的主清单。问卷调查分两个阶段进行,即验证调查和可靠性调查。15 位专家回答了验证调查,30 位专家回答了可靠性调查。根据调查收集的数据计算标准和次级标准的权重,通过相对重要性指数计算相对重要性,并对标准进行排序。通过调查得出的标准权重为:健康安全 13.19%,其次是维护 11.93%,时间 11.93%,质量 13.38%,客户满意度 12.42%,环境安全 12.32%,生产率 12.51%,法规 12.32%。本文提供了在项目执行阶段评估承包商绩效所需的标准和次级标准及其权重。这项研究可以引导一种持续衡量绩效的文化,以圆满完成项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Civil Engineering
Archives of Civil Engineering ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: ARCHIVES OF CIVIL ENGINEERING publish original papers of the theoretical, experimental, numerical and practical nature in the fields of structural mechanics, soil mechanics and foundations engineering, concrete, metal, timber and composite polymer structures, hydrotechnical structures, roads, railways and bridges, building services, building physics, management in construction, production of construction materials, construction of civil engineering structures, education of civil engineers.
期刊最新文献
Shape identification of the jet-grouted column based on the thermal analysis and differential evolution Permeability of sandy soils estimated from particle size distribution and field measurements Proactive-reactive repetitive project scheduling method – the concept of risk consideration at the project planning and execution stage Laboratory tests of pull-off strength of chosen USPs attached to concrete sleepers Behaviour of soil-steel composite structures during construction and service: a review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1