“That is why users do not understand the maps we make for them”: Cartographic gaps between experts and domestic workers and the Right to the City

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Data & policy Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1017/dap.2023.34
Valentina Montoya-Robledo
{"title":"“That is why users do not understand the maps we make for them”: Cartographic gaps between experts and domestic workers and the Right to the City","authors":"Valentina Montoya-Robledo","doi":"10.1017/dap.2023.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A broad gap exists between “God’s eye” transit maps from above that experts draw and how domestic workers map their commutes in Bogotá and Medellín, Colombia, through a street-level approach. Based on fieldwork conducted in both cities between 2017 and 2018, including interviews, participant observation, and social cartography, this translational article brings domestic workers’ understanding of the city they traverse daily vis-à-vis how experts conceive modern and rational public transportation systems. Delving into the literature on cartography, the Right to the City (RtC), and feminist geography, the study analyzes this gap and finds how it limits an effective RtC for this massive group of female commuters. It further provides public policy recommendations to address the gap and ensure RtC for all.","PeriodicalId":93427,"journal":{"name":"Data & policy","volume":"36 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2023.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract A broad gap exists between “God’s eye” transit maps from above that experts draw and how domestic workers map their commutes in Bogotá and Medellín, Colombia, through a street-level approach. Based on fieldwork conducted in both cities between 2017 and 2018, including interviews, participant observation, and social cartography, this translational article brings domestic workers’ understanding of the city they traverse daily vis-à-vis how experts conceive modern and rational public transportation systems. Delving into the literature on cartography, the Right to the City (RtC), and feminist geography, the study analyzes this gap and finds how it limits an effective RtC for this massive group of female commuters. It further provides public policy recommendations to address the gap and ensure RtC for all.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"这就是为什么用户不理解我们为他们制作的地图":专家与家庭佣工之间的地图差距以及城市权
摘要 专家绘制的高空 "上帝之眼 "交通地图与家政工人如何通过街道层面的方法绘制他们在哥伦比亚波哥大和麦德林的通勤地图之间存在巨大差距。这篇翻译文章基于 2017 年至 2018 年期间在这两个城市进行的实地调查,包括访谈、参与观察和社会制图,将家庭佣工对他们每天穿越的城市的理解与专家如何构想现代合理的公共交通系统相对照。通过深入研究地图学、城市权(RtC)和女性主义地理学方面的文献,该研究分析了这一差距,并发现这一差距如何限制了为这一庞大的女性通勤群体提供有效的 RtC。研究还提出了一些公共政策建议,以消除这一差距,确保人人享有城市出行权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Determinants for university students’ location data sharing with public institutions during COVID-19: The Italian case Bus Rapid Transit: End of trend in Latin America? Accelerating and enhancing the generation of socioeconomic data to inform forced displacement policy and response “That is why users do not understand the maps we make for them”: Cartographic gaps between experts and domestic workers and the Right to the City Analysis of spatial–temporal validation patterns in Fortaleza’s public transport systems: a data mining approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1