Reexamining the classroom simulation: Guidelines for making affirming pedagogical choices

Q3 Social Sciences Middle School Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI:10.1080/00940771.2023.2282600
Karen Burgard, Michael L. Boucher, Jr, Tina M. Ellsworth
{"title":"Reexamining the classroom simulation: Guidelines for making affirming pedagogical choices","authors":"Karen Burgard, Michael L. Boucher, Jr, Tina M. Ellsworth","doi":"10.1080/00940771.2023.2282600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract At the same time teachers and administrators grapple with how to develop teachers’ understanding of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the classroom, recent legislative sessions have unleashed a flood of legislation that seeks to limit teachers from teaching about race, racism, oppression, and injustice in U.S. schools. Teachers are struggling with how to balance student engagement and interest while also tackling these large, complex, and difficult topics. Unfortunately, the continued practice of using classroom simulations that attempt to undertake these difficult topics does not meet the challenge. This article examines the potential dangers when using classroom simulations to teach sensitive topics and provides strategies for teachers to create engaging and innovative lessons that educate and empower, and do not marginalize students in the process. To create classrooms that are safe and affirming, the practice of using classroom simulations needs a renewed examination, particularly ones that delve into culturally and historically sensitive topics.","PeriodicalId":37061,"journal":{"name":"Middle School Journal","volume":"108 40","pages":"4 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle School Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2023.2282600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract At the same time teachers and administrators grapple with how to develop teachers’ understanding of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the classroom, recent legislative sessions have unleashed a flood of legislation that seeks to limit teachers from teaching about race, racism, oppression, and injustice in U.S. schools. Teachers are struggling with how to balance student engagement and interest while also tackling these large, complex, and difficult topics. Unfortunately, the continued practice of using classroom simulations that attempt to undertake these difficult topics does not meet the challenge. This article examines the potential dangers when using classroom simulations to teach sensitive topics and provides strategies for teachers to create engaging and innovative lessons that educate and empower, and do not marginalize students in the process. To create classrooms that are safe and affirming, the practice of using classroom simulations needs a renewed examination, particularly ones that delve into culturally and historically sensitive topics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视模拟课堂:做出肯定性教学选择的指导原则
摘要 就在教师和管理者为如何在课堂上培养教师对多样性、公平性和包容性的理解而 努力的同时,最近的立法会议又出台了大量立法,试图限制教师在美国学校教授有关 种族、种族主义、压迫和不公正的内容。教师们既要解决这些庞大、复杂和困难的话题,又要兼顾学生的参与和兴趣,这让他们很是头疼。遗憾的是,一直以来使用课堂模拟来尝试解决这些难题的做法并不能应对挑战。本文探讨了使用模拟课堂教学敏感话题时的潜在危险,并为教师提供了一些策略,以创建引人入胜的创新课程,既能教育学生,又能增强学生的能力,而且在此过程中不会使学生边缘化。为了创建安全、平等的课堂,需要重新审视使用课堂模拟的做法,尤其是那些涉及文化和历史敏感话题的课堂模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Middle School Journal
Middle School Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Integrating mental health literacy in the English language arts middle school classroom A crosswalk of digital storytelling and multilingual learning Authoring pandemic personal narratives: Middle level students’ representations of life during the 2020-21 school year Toward a culturally sustaining science of reading On the need for middle level advocacy: A district administrator responds to AMLE’s National Policy Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1