Seeing Eye-to-Eye

Q3 Psychology Rorschachiana Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1027/1192-5604/a000169
Barry Dauphin, Harold H. Greene, Mindee Juve, MellisaA. Boyle, Ellen Day-Suba
{"title":"Seeing Eye-to-Eye","authors":"Barry Dauphin, Harold H. Greene, Mindee Juve, MellisaA. Boyle, Ellen Day-Suba","doi":"10.1027/1192-5604/a000169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Considering the continuing interest in the use of eye-tracking technology for study of the Rorschach response process, the present study examines the internal consistencies for several eye-tracking indices during Rorschach administration. Many experimental psychologists have recently maintained that researchers should be interested in and report the internal consistency statistics of performance measures, including eye tracking in order to improve effect size, the power of hypothesis testing, and the replicability of findings. In the current study, eye-tracking variables more relevant to understanding top–down (goal-driven) processes showed good-to-excellent internal consistencies, while variables largely affected by bottom–up (stimulus-driven) processes showed questionable or poor internal consistency. The current findings provide support for recent research strategies of utilizing protocol-level eye-tracking averages to link to Rorschach coding variables. In addition, the current study found differences across cards for the eye-tracking variables, showing medium-to-large effect sizes, which provides evidence for the stimulus pull of the cards for visual search strategies, including variables not previously used in Rorschach research.","PeriodicalId":39365,"journal":{"name":"Rorschachiana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rorschachiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1192-5604/a000169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Considering the continuing interest in the use of eye-tracking technology for study of the Rorschach response process, the present study examines the internal consistencies for several eye-tracking indices during Rorschach administration. Many experimental psychologists have recently maintained that researchers should be interested in and report the internal consistency statistics of performance measures, including eye tracking in order to improve effect size, the power of hypothesis testing, and the replicability of findings. In the current study, eye-tracking variables more relevant to understanding top–down (goal-driven) processes showed good-to-excellent internal consistencies, while variables largely affected by bottom–up (stimulus-driven) processes showed questionable or poor internal consistency. The current findings provide support for recent research strategies of utilizing protocol-level eye-tracking averages to link to Rorschach coding variables. In addition, the current study found differences across cards for the eye-tracking variables, showing medium-to-large effect sizes, which provides evidence for the stimulus pull of the cards for visual search strategies, including variables not previously used in Rorschach research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视线相交
摘要:考虑到人们对使用眼动追踪技术研究罗夏克反应过程的持续兴趣,本研究对罗夏克施测过程中几个眼动追踪指标的内部一致性进行了检验。最近,许多实验心理学家认为,研究人员应该关注并报告包括眼动追踪在内的表现测量的内部一致性统计,以提高效应大小、假设检验的功率和研究结果的可复制性。在目前的研究中,与理解自上而下(目标驱动)过程更相关的眼动跟踪变量显示出良好到出色的内部一致性,而主要受自下而上(刺激驱动)过程影响的变量则显示出可疑或较差的内部一致性。目前的研究结果支持了近期的研究策略,即利用协议级眼动追踪平均值与罗夏克编码变量建立联系。此外,当前的研究还发现了眼动跟踪变量在不同卡片上的差异,显示出中等到较大的效应大小,这为卡片对视觉搜索策略的刺激拉动提供了证据,包括以前在罗夏克研究中未使用过的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rorschachiana
Rorschachiana Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
When Inkblot Imitates Life – A Case Study of Rorschach Content Analysis The Processometric Consensus Rorschach Test (pCRT-II) – An Improved Evaluation System The Parallel Series – The Behn–Rorschach Inkblot Test The Parallel Series – The Behn–Rorschach Inkblot Test Seeing Eye-to-Eye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1