CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH STRATEGIES IN PEDAGOGICAL STUDIES: EXPERIENCE OF UKRAINE AND POLAND

N. Nychkalo, M. Vovk, T. Yanytska-Panek
{"title":"CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH STRATEGIES IN PEDAGOGICAL STUDIES: EXPERIENCE OF UKRAINE AND POLAND","authors":"N. Nychkalo, M. Vovk, T. Yanytska-Panek","doi":"10.33989/2226-4051.2023.28.293146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout the late 20th to the first quarter of the 21st century, three strategies of pedagogical research have been developed in the field of educational and pedagogical sciences. These strategies have evolved in response to the issues addressed in dissertation research and involve the conduct of scientific inquiries through the researcher's activities. The strategies include experimental, comparative-pedagogical, and historical-pedagogical approaches. Currently, within the European context, stable methodological strategies for conducting research studies in the field of educational and pedagogical sciences have emerged. These strategies predominantly focus on experimental research utilizing quantitative characteristics to analyze the dynamics of the growth of a specific quality among the researched category of individuals. They also involve comparative pedagogical research aimed at presenting best educational practices from international experiences and implementing them in the education systems of other countries. Furthermore, there is an emphasis on the revitalization of historical-pedagogical experiences of a particular country to preserve national identity, affirm cultural values, and promote education and scientific values at the state level. The methodology of pedagogical research requires further substantiation and continuous updating of the conceptual-terminological apparatus, which cannot be considered narrowly and should develop within the confines of a single subject area. Interdisciplinarity in scientific inquiry becomes an objective necessity. Psychopedagogy and digital pedagogy as scientific disciplines in the 21st century acquire special significance and are promising in online research. Ukrainian and Polish researchers have significant experience in crystallizing contemporary methodological strategies in pedagogical research. Joint scientific discussions between them contribute to the development of methodological pluralism, openness in research space, and interdisciplinary scientific exploration, taking into account traditions and innovations in the field of educational sciences. This collaboration also plays a role in affirming the development of pedagogical sub-disciplines in the context of open science and the digitization of research content.","PeriodicalId":357387,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetics and Ethics of Pedagogical Action","volume":" 41","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetics and Ethics of Pedagogical Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33989/2226-4051.2023.28.293146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Throughout the late 20th to the first quarter of the 21st century, three strategies of pedagogical research have been developed in the field of educational and pedagogical sciences. These strategies have evolved in response to the issues addressed in dissertation research and involve the conduct of scientific inquiries through the researcher's activities. The strategies include experimental, comparative-pedagogical, and historical-pedagogical approaches. Currently, within the European context, stable methodological strategies for conducting research studies in the field of educational and pedagogical sciences have emerged. These strategies predominantly focus on experimental research utilizing quantitative characteristics to analyze the dynamics of the growth of a specific quality among the researched category of individuals. They also involve comparative pedagogical research aimed at presenting best educational practices from international experiences and implementing them in the education systems of other countries. Furthermore, there is an emphasis on the revitalization of historical-pedagogical experiences of a particular country to preserve national identity, affirm cultural values, and promote education and scientific values at the state level. The methodology of pedagogical research requires further substantiation and continuous updating of the conceptual-terminological apparatus, which cannot be considered narrowly and should develop within the confines of a single subject area. Interdisciplinarity in scientific inquiry becomes an objective necessity. Psychopedagogy and digital pedagogy as scientific disciplines in the 21st century acquire special significance and are promising in online research. Ukrainian and Polish researchers have significant experience in crystallizing contemporary methodological strategies in pedagogical research. Joint scientific discussions between them contribute to the development of methodological pluralism, openness in research space, and interdisciplinary scientific exploration, taking into account traditions and innovations in the field of educational sciences. This collaboration also plays a role in affirming the development of pedagogical sub-disciplines in the context of open science and the digitization of research content.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代教学研究战略:乌克兰和波兰的经验
从 20 世纪末到 21 世纪第一季度,在教育和教学科学领域形成了三种教学研究战 略。这些策略是针对学位论文研究中所涉及的问题而发展起来的,涉及通过研究者的活动进行科学探究。这些策略包括实验法、比较教学法和历史教学法。目前,在欧洲范围内,出现了在教育和教学科学领域开展研究性学习的稳定方法策略。这些策略主要侧重于实验研究,利用定量特征来分析所研究的各类个体中特定素质的增长动态。它们还涉及比较教学研究,旨在介绍国际经验中的最佳教育做法,并在其他国家的教育系统中加以实施。此外,还强调振兴特定国家的历史教学经验,以维护民族特性,肯定文化价值,并在国家层面促进教育和科学价值。教育学研究的方法论需要进一步充实和不断更新概念--定义工具,不能狭隘地考虑这一点,而应在单一学科领域的范围内发展。科学探索中的跨学科性成为一种客观需要。心理教育学和数字教育学作为 21 世纪的科学学科,在在线研究中具有特殊的意义和前景。乌克兰和波兰的研究人员在具体化当代教学研究方法策略方面拥有丰富的经验。他们之间的联合科学讨论有助于发展方法论的多元化、研究空间的开放性和跨学科科学探索,同时考虑到教育科学领域的传统和创新。在开放科学和研究内容数字化的背景下,这种合作还在肯定教育学分支学科的发展方面发挥了作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FORMATION OF READINESS OF FUTURE SPECIALISTS OF PRESCHOOL EDUCATION FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SELF-IMPROVEMENT: ACMEOLOGICAL APPROACH STUDENT SCIENTIFIC PROBLEM GROUPS AS AN INTEGRAL FACTOR OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING FOR HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS MAJORING IN MUSICAL SPECIALTIES AESTHETICS OF A HUMAN SMILE: MEDICAL-BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL-PEDAGOGICAL ASPECTS SYNERGY OF SPIRITUALITY AND CREATIVITY IN STUDENT CULTURAL AND ART PROJECTS CHALLENGES IN THE MODERNIZATION OF GENERAL SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN UKRAINE (FIRST QUARTER OF THE 21ST CENTURY)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1