Comparative Constructions with Images of Flowers in Modern Russian Prose

Natalia Nikolina, Z. Petrova, N. Fateeva
{"title":"Comparative Constructions with Images of Flowers in Modern Russian Prose","authors":"Natalia Nikolina, Z. Petrova, N. Fateeva","doi":"10.35785/2072-9464-2023-62-48-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of study are comparative constructions (metaphors and similes) which include the names of flowers. The material for the study is the texts of modern Russian prose, as well as contexts extracted from the Russian National Corpus. The purpose of the paper is to analyze these constructions in comparison with the tropes of the previous period. The images of comparison, the objects of comparison and the bases for comparison of comparative tropes have been considered, their semantic classification is presented. In the course of the study, the \nfollowing conclusions were drawn: images of flowers are not as productive in modern prose as compared to other semantic classes of images of comparison, such as classes of zoonyms and names of artifacts; at the same time, they form a \nsignificant fragment of the metaphorical world image in modern prose. New elements appear in the composition of metaphors and similes with images of flowers, the range of objects of comparison is also expanding. In modern prose, traditional metaphorical models are preserved, but they are rethought and their character is partially changed. The use of flower images in modern texts is predominantly anthropocentric with an emphasis on the human bodily plane, which distinguishes them from functioning in the previous period. Modern prose is characterized by a tendency to lower the image when using the considered comparative tropes. \nComparative constructions with images of flowers act in modern texts in various functions: a function of figurative characteristics of various objects, an evaluative function, and, more rarely, an intertextual one.","PeriodicalId":211127,"journal":{"name":"Izvestia of Smolensk State University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestia of Smolensk State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35785/2072-9464-2023-62-48-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of study are comparative constructions (metaphors and similes) which include the names of flowers. The material for the study is the texts of modern Russian prose, as well as contexts extracted from the Russian National Corpus. The purpose of the paper is to analyze these constructions in comparison with the tropes of the previous period. The images of comparison, the objects of comparison and the bases for comparison of comparative tropes have been considered, their semantic classification is presented. In the course of the study, the following conclusions were drawn: images of flowers are not as productive in modern prose as compared to other semantic classes of images of comparison, such as classes of zoonyms and names of artifacts; at the same time, they form a significant fragment of the metaphorical world image in modern prose. New elements appear in the composition of metaphors and similes with images of flowers, the range of objects of comparison is also expanding. In modern prose, traditional metaphorical models are preserved, but they are rethought and their character is partially changed. The use of flower images in modern texts is predominantly anthropocentric with an emphasis on the human bodily plane, which distinguishes them from functioning in the previous period. Modern prose is characterized by a tendency to lower the image when using the considered comparative tropes. Comparative constructions with images of flowers act in modern texts in various functions: a function of figurative characteristics of various objects, an evaluative function, and, more rarely, an intertextual one.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯现代散文中的花卉形象比较结构
研究对象是包含花名的比较结构(隐喻和比喻)。研究材料是现代俄罗斯散文文本以及从俄罗斯国家语料库中提取的语境。本文的目的是将这些结构与前一时期的套语进行比较分析。本文考虑了比较的形象、比较的对象和比较语式的比较基础,并对其语义进行了分类。在研究过程中,得出了以下结论:与其他语义类别的比较形象(如动物名称和器物名称)相比,花卉形象在现代散文中并不那么富有成效;同时,它们构成了现代散文中隐喻世界形象的重要片段。花卉形象的比喻和比拟的构成出现了新的元素,比拟对象的范围也在不断扩大。在现代散文中,传统的隐喻模式得以保留,但对其进行了重新思考,部分改变了其特征。现代文中对花的意象的运用主要以人类为中心,强调人的身体层面,这与前一时期的功能有所区别。现代散文的特点是,在使用所考虑的对比手法时,倾向于降低形象。在现代文本中,花卉形象的比较结构具有多种功能:各种对象的形象特征功能、评价功能,以及更罕见的互文功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anglo-Russian Military Cooperation in the Year of 1799: Based on the Materials from the «Journal of the Dutch Expedition» by I. Fiodorov The Defender of the Orthodoxy or the Pious Catholic? St. Sophia of Slutsk in the Narratives of 19th – early 20th Centuries Formation of the Legal Basis for Social Security of Disabled People of the Great Patriotic War in the BSSR (1940−1950s) Semantic Modeling of Ways to Verbalize Emotions in the Political Discourse of Germany Regensburg Convention of Electors 1636/1637 and Brandenburg's Struggle for Imperial Peace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1