Single-Spine Agricultural Extension System Governance Structures And Adoption Of Agricultural Technological Innovations

Paul Mwambu, G. Karyeija, Edgar Kateshumbwa Mwesigye, Hizaamu Ramadhan
{"title":"Single-Spine Agricultural Extension System Governance Structures And Adoption Of Agricultural Technological Innovations","authors":"Paul Mwambu, G. Karyeija, Edgar Kateshumbwa Mwesigye, Hizaamu Ramadhan","doi":"10.14738/abr.1112.15929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzed the governance structures of the single spine agricultural extension system and their effects on adoption of technological innovations by farmer groups in Kiryandongo and Rukungiri Districts of Uganda. This was premised on the view that despite introduction of the single spine agricultural extension service as a policy intervention to increase adoption of innovations for agricultural production and productivity in 2016, four years down the road, these aspirations have not been realized. The research adopted a cross sectional case study design underpinned by the constructivism paradigm. A none-mathematical sampling method was used for key informants and focus group discussions. Data from documents review was triangulated with that from interviews and formed the basis for analysis of findings and report writing. The findings indicated that the limited attention given to the governance structures was one of the fundamental factors that negatively impacted on adoption of agricultural innovations. Failure to provide sufficient resources for monitoring policy implementation undermined the very essence for which it was contrived. It is recommended that the same Ministry strengthens partnerships with the private sector and other non-state actors by taking the lead role in delivery of extension services. This is premised on the notion that District Local Governments have the institutional mandate and structures while the private sector and non-state actors wield the needed resources for enhancing the adoption of agricultural innovations.","PeriodicalId":72277,"journal":{"name":"Archives of business research","volume":"4 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of business research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1112.15929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzed the governance structures of the single spine agricultural extension system and their effects on adoption of technological innovations by farmer groups in Kiryandongo and Rukungiri Districts of Uganda. This was premised on the view that despite introduction of the single spine agricultural extension service as a policy intervention to increase adoption of innovations for agricultural production and productivity in 2016, four years down the road, these aspirations have not been realized. The research adopted a cross sectional case study design underpinned by the constructivism paradigm. A none-mathematical sampling method was used for key informants and focus group discussions. Data from documents review was triangulated with that from interviews and formed the basis for analysis of findings and report writing. The findings indicated that the limited attention given to the governance structures was one of the fundamental factors that negatively impacted on adoption of agricultural innovations. Failure to provide sufficient resources for monitoring policy implementation undermined the very essence for which it was contrived. It is recommended that the same Ministry strengthens partnerships with the private sector and other non-state actors by taking the lead role in delivery of extension services. This is premised on the notion that District Local Governments have the institutional mandate and structures while the private sector and non-state actors wield the needed resources for enhancing the adoption of agricultural innovations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单刺农业推广系统治理结构与农业技术创新的采用
本研究分析了单一脊柱农业推广系统的治理结构及其对乌干达基里亚东戈和鲁孔吉里地区农民团体采用技术创新的影响。其前提是,尽管在 2016 年引入了单一脊柱农业推广服务,作为提高农业生产和生产力创新采用率的政策干预措施,但四年过去了,这些愿望并未实现。研究采用了以建构主义范式为基础的横断面案例研究设计。对关键信息提供者和焦点小组讨论采用了非数学抽样方法。文件审查数据与访谈数据进行了三角验证,为分析研究结果和撰写报告奠定了基础。研究结果表明,对治理结构的关注有限是对采用农业创新产生负面影响的基本因素之一。未能为监测政策执行情况提供充足的资源,破坏了制定政策的初衷。建议该部加强与私营部门和其他非国家行为者的伙伴关系,在提供推广服务方面发挥主导作用。这样做的前提是,地区地方政府拥有体制授权和结构,而私营部门和非国家行为者则掌握着促进采用农业创新所需的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health and Safety Training to Include Disaster Response: Building Better Resiliency Through Union Leadership. Unlocking Retail Success: Empowering Decision-Making with Advanced Sales Forecast Models Trends in The Study of Administration Professional Agent Perspectives on Representing WNBA Athletes in the United States A Comparison of Three Asian English Textbooks by Correspondence Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1