Effect of spraying with silicon, humic acid, and proline on the safflower tolerance (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to salt stress

Qadesia Alabdulwahed, K. Huthily
{"title":"Effect of spraying with silicon, humic acid, and proline on the safflower tolerance (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to salt stress","authors":"Qadesia Alabdulwahed, K. Huthily","doi":"10.21931/rb/2023.08.04.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The experiment was carried out in the winter of season 2021-2022 in the research field of the College of Agriculture - University of Basra (latitude 30.57° North and longitude 47.80°) to study the effect of foliar spraying of silicon, humic acid, and proline on the endurance of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to salt stress. The experiment was carried out by distributing eight treatments of foliar spraying. Silicon (Si) was sprayed at a concentration of 800 ppm, humic acid (H) at a concentration of 80 ppm, and proline (P) at a concentration of 100 ppm. The studied treatments included control (C), Si, H, P, SiH, SiP, HP, and SiHP) on two soils with salinity (7.63 and 14.24 ds m-1) randomized complete block design with three replicates. The seeds of safflower (Cv. Gila) were planted in the two soils. The results showed significant superiority of the triple treatment (SiHP) in all studied traits, as it recorded the highest mean of height (156.3 cm), number of bells in the plant 59.11, number of seeds in the bell (59.17), weight of 500 seeds (24.30 g), seeds yield (10549 kg seeds ha-1) and biological yield (27582 kg ha-1) with a significant increase over the control treatment, which amounted to 64.2 cm, 26.08 bell plant-1, 24.90 seed bell-1, 14.03 g, 1725 kg seeds ha-1 and 6594 kg.ha-1 respectively—superiority of the proline treatment in all studied traits. Salinity decreased the number of seeds in the plant, the weight of 500 seeds, and seed yield. The foliar spray with the above treatments has proven its effectiveness and efficiency in growth and yield and increased salinity tolerance, in addition to the fact that these materials are environmentally friendly.\n \nKeywords: Foliar Spraying; Salinity; Silicon; Humic acid; proline.","PeriodicalId":9036,"journal":{"name":"Bionatura","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bionatura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21931/rb/2023.08.04.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The experiment was carried out in the winter of season 2021-2022 in the research field of the College of Agriculture - University of Basra (latitude 30.57° North and longitude 47.80°) to study the effect of foliar spraying of silicon, humic acid, and proline on the endurance of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to salt stress. The experiment was carried out by distributing eight treatments of foliar spraying. Silicon (Si) was sprayed at a concentration of 800 ppm, humic acid (H) at a concentration of 80 ppm, and proline (P) at a concentration of 100 ppm. The studied treatments included control (C), Si, H, P, SiH, SiP, HP, and SiHP) on two soils with salinity (7.63 and 14.24 ds m-1) randomized complete block design with three replicates. The seeds of safflower (Cv. Gila) were planted in the two soils. The results showed significant superiority of the triple treatment (SiHP) in all studied traits, as it recorded the highest mean of height (156.3 cm), number of bells in the plant 59.11, number of seeds in the bell (59.17), weight of 500 seeds (24.30 g), seeds yield (10549 kg seeds ha-1) and biological yield (27582 kg ha-1) with a significant increase over the control treatment, which amounted to 64.2 cm, 26.08 bell plant-1, 24.90 seed bell-1, 14.03 g, 1725 kg seeds ha-1 and 6594 kg.ha-1 respectively—superiority of the proline treatment in all studied traits. Salinity decreased the number of seeds in the plant, the weight of 500 seeds, and seed yield. The foliar spray with the above treatments has proven its effectiveness and efficiency in growth and yield and increased salinity tolerance, in addition to the fact that these materials are environmentally friendly. Keywords: Foliar Spraying; Salinity; Silicon; Humic acid; proline.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
喷洒硅、腐殖酸和脯氨酸对红花(Carthamus tinctorius L.)耐盐胁迫性的影响
该实验于 2021-2022 年冬季在巴士拉大学农学院(北纬 30.57°,东经 47.80°)的研究田中进行,旨在研究叶面喷洒硅、腐殖酸和脯氨酸对红花(Carthamus tinctorius L.)抗盐胁迫能力的影响。实验采用八种叶面喷施处理。硅(Si)的喷洒浓度为 800 ppm,腐植酸(H)的喷洒浓度为 80 ppm,脯氨酸(P)的喷洒浓度为 100 ppm。研究的处理包括对照(C)、Si、H、P、SiH、SiP、HP 和 SiHP),在两种含盐量(7.63 和 14.24 ds m-1)的土壤上进行随机完全区组设计,三次重复。红花(Cv. Gila)的种子被种植在这两种土壤中。结果表明,三重处理(SiHP)在所有研究性状上都有明显优势,其平均株高(156.3 厘米)、株铃数(59.11)、株铃种子数(59.17)、500 粒种子重量(24.脯氨酸处理的平均株高(156.3 厘米)、株铃数(59.11 个)、铃内种子数(59.17 粒)、500 粒种子重量(24.30 克)、种子产量(10549 千克种子公顷-1)和生物产量(27582 千克公顷-1)均显著高于对照处理,分别为 64.2 厘米、26.08 个铃株-1、24.90 个铃内种子-1、14.03 克、1725 千克种子公顷-1 和 6594 千克公顷-1。盐度降低了植株中的种子数量、500 粒种子的重量和种子产量。使用上述处理方法进行叶面喷洒证明了其在生长和产量方面的有效性和效率,并提高了耐盐性,此外,这些材料还对环境友好。关键词叶面喷洒;盐度;硅;腐植酸;脯氨酸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Foliar Application of Alhagi maurorum Extract on Foeniculum vulgare Growth Production and characterization of flavored goat milk gels using zinc and calcium salts Producing functional foods Effect of spraying with silicon, humic acid, and proline on the safflower tolerance (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to salt stress Biological, serological and molecular characterization of Potato virus Y strains isolated from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) First report of Alternaria alternata associated with spot blotch of barley (Hordeum vulgare) in Iraq.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1