Impact of dose and adjuvant on herbicidal efficacy of birch‐based pyrolysis liquid

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Weed Research Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1111/wre.12607
M. Hagner, P. Ruuttunen, Terho Hyvönen
{"title":"Impact of dose and adjuvant on herbicidal efficacy of birch‐based pyrolysis liquid","authors":"M. Hagner, P. Ruuttunen, Terho Hyvönen","doi":"10.1111/wre.12607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reduction of pesticide use to benefit the environment is a topical issue in the EU. There is a call for development and more widespread use of sustainable alternative weed control measures. Pyrolysis liquid (PL), a by‐product of charcoal and biochar production, contains numerous compounds, including organic acids, alcohols, phenols and furans. PL has shown promising results when used against several broad‐leaved weeds but its effect on grassy weeds is largely untested. To provide an alternative to synthetic herbicides, PL should be effective and applicable at field scale. In this research, we initially evaluated the potential of birch (Betula sp.) based PL to control mono‐ and dicotyledonous plants under greenhouse conditions and determined if efficacy is improved by addition of an adjuvant. Second, the efficacy of PL for controlling Elymus repens (L.) Gould was compared with glyphosate and two other synthetic herbicides in a no‐tillage system under field conditions. As expected, dicotyledonous plants were more sensitive to acid‐based herbicides than monocotyledonous plants. In contrast to our expectations, the herbicidal efficacy of PL was lower than an acetic acid‐based herbicide and addition of an adjuvant did not improve efficacy. In conclusion, when used at commercially and practically realistic doses, the efficacy of PL control on monocotyledonous weeds such as E. repens is weak. More product development is needed to improve PL quality and efficacy and to establish practical and cost‐effective application levels for weed control on the field scale.","PeriodicalId":23661,"journal":{"name":"Weed Research","volume":"13 5part2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12607","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reduction of pesticide use to benefit the environment is a topical issue in the EU. There is a call for development and more widespread use of sustainable alternative weed control measures. Pyrolysis liquid (PL), a by‐product of charcoal and biochar production, contains numerous compounds, including organic acids, alcohols, phenols and furans. PL has shown promising results when used against several broad‐leaved weeds but its effect on grassy weeds is largely untested. To provide an alternative to synthetic herbicides, PL should be effective and applicable at field scale. In this research, we initially evaluated the potential of birch (Betula sp.) based PL to control mono‐ and dicotyledonous plants under greenhouse conditions and determined if efficacy is improved by addition of an adjuvant. Second, the efficacy of PL for controlling Elymus repens (L.) Gould was compared with glyphosate and two other synthetic herbicides in a no‐tillage system under field conditions. As expected, dicotyledonous plants were more sensitive to acid‐based herbicides than monocotyledonous plants. In contrast to our expectations, the herbicidal efficacy of PL was lower than an acetic acid‐based herbicide and addition of an adjuvant did not improve efficacy. In conclusion, when used at commercially and practically realistic doses, the efficacy of PL control on monocotyledonous weeds such as E. repens is weak. More product development is needed to improve PL quality and efficacy and to establish practical and cost‐effective application levels for weed control on the field scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剂量和佐剂对桦木热解液除草效果的影响
减少杀虫剂的使用以保护环境是欧盟的一个热点问题。人们呼吁开发和更广泛地使用可持续的替代杂草控制措施。热解液(PL)是木炭和生物炭生产的副产品,含有多种化合物,包括有机酸、醇、酚和呋喃。热解液在对付几种阔叶杂草时显示出了良好的效果,但其对禾本科杂草的效果基本上还没有经过测试。为了提供合成除草剂的替代品,聚乳酸应该有效且适用于田间规模。在这项研究中,我们首先评估了基于桦树(Betula sp.)的聚乳酸在温室条件下控制单子叶和双子叶植物的潜力,并确定添加佐剂是否能提高药效。其次,在田间免耕系统中,比较了聚乳酸与草甘膦和其他两种合成除草剂在控制 Elymus repens (L.) Gould 方面的功效。不出所料,双子叶植物比单子叶植物对酸性除草剂更敏感。与我们的预期相反,聚乳酸的除草效果低于乙酸类除草剂,而且添加佐剂也不会提高除草效果。总之,当使用商业和实际可行的剂量时,聚乳酸对单子叶杂草(如E. repens)的防效较弱。需要进行更多的产品开发,以提高聚乳酸的质量和药效,并在田间规模上确定实用且具有成本效益的除草施用量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Weed Research
Weed Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Research is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes topical and innovative papers on weed science, in the English language. Its aim is to publish the best weed science from around the globe and to be the journal of choice for weed science researchers. It is the official journal of the European Weed Research Society. Papers are taken on all aspects of weeds, defined as plants that impact adversely on economic, aesthetic or environmental aspects of any system. Topics include, amongst others, weed biology and control, herbicides, invasive plant species in all environments, population and spatial biology, modelling, genetics, biodiversity and parasitic plants. The journal welcomes submissions on work carried out in any part of the world.
期刊最新文献
Improved control of Taraxacum officinale with 2,4‐D in the field from ammonium sulphate additions Key management practices to reduce the risk of the occurrence of Rumex obtusifolius in productive grasslands Impact of dose and adjuvant on herbicidal efficacy of birch‐based pyrolysis liquid Influence of light, nutrients, and soil moisture on the growth and resource allocation of Arundo donax Variability structure and heritability of germination timing in Capsella bursa‐pastoris (L.) Medik. (Shepherd's purse)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1