Tantra Ducks and Zen Bunnies

S. Licha
{"title":"Tantra Ducks and Zen Bunnies","authors":"S. Licha","doi":"10.1163/25897179-12340016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis paper reconsiders the relationship between esoteric or tantric Buddhism and Zen in premodern Japan. Taking the teachings of Enni 圓爾 (1202–1280) and early modern Sōtō lore as its examples, as well as an adapted version of Wittgenstein’s concept of “seeing-as” as its methodological guideline, the paper argues that the categories of “esoteric Buddhism” and “Zen” themselves should be treated as discursively constructed. From this point of view, the scholarly desideratum is to undertake the genealogical elucidation of the process of their construction. The paper concludes that “esoteric Zen” should be considered a family of strategic, discursive practices predicated on acts of “seeing-as” and their subsequent sedimentation through repetition.","PeriodicalId":272024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chan Buddhism","volume":"99 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chan Buddhism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/25897179-12340016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reconsiders the relationship between esoteric or tantric Buddhism and Zen in premodern Japan. Taking the teachings of Enni 圓爾 (1202–1280) and early modern Sōtō lore as its examples, as well as an adapted version of Wittgenstein’s concept of “seeing-as” as its methodological guideline, the paper argues that the categories of “esoteric Buddhism” and “Zen” themselves should be treated as discursively constructed. From this point of view, the scholarly desideratum is to undertake the genealogical elucidation of the process of their construction. The paper concludes that “esoteric Zen” should be considered a family of strategic, discursive practices predicated on acts of “seeing-as” and their subsequent sedimentation through repetition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
密宗鸭子和禅宗兔子
本文重新探讨了前现代日本密宗或密教与禅宗之间的关系。本文以圆尔圆尼(1202-1280 年)的教义和近代早期的总持传说为例,并以维特根斯坦的 "视如 "概念为方法论指导,认为 "密宗 "和 "禅 "这两个范畴本身应被视为话语建构的范畴。从这一观点出发,学术的当务之急是对其建构过程进行谱系学阐释。本文的结论是,"密宗禅 "应被视为一系列策略性的话语实践,其前提是 "视之为 "的行为及其随后通过重复的沉淀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Zen of Mahāvairocana, Or: Does Bodhidharma’s Nose Preach the Dharma? When Zen Becomes Philosophy: The Case of Dōgen’s Uji Tantra Ducks and Zen Bunnies The Date of the Stein Manuscript of the Platform Sūtra How Zen became Chan: Pre-modern and Modern Representations of a Transnational East Asian Buddhist Tradition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1