Environmental Impact Assessment of Building Materials Using Life Cycle Assessment

Milad Ghanbari
{"title":"Environmental Impact Assessment of Building Materials Using Life Cycle Assessment","authors":"Milad Ghanbari","doi":"10.30564/jaeser.v6i4.5964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In pursuit of environmental sustainability in the construction sector, this study employs a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) approach to evaluate the environmental impact of widely used building materials in Iran, with a particular focus on energy consumption and carbon footprint. The investigation encompasses 22 widely used building materials, utilizing the Ecoinvent v3 database and Simapro8 software to assess critical environmental variables, including carbon dioxide (CO2) emission, required primary energy, water consumption, and thermal conductivity. The findings unveil the diverse environmental profiles of these materials, with thermal conductivity typically hovering around zero to 2 W/m.K for most, but with exceptions such as lime, aluminum, rebar, and steel exhibiting significantly higher values. Moreover, aluminum, ceramics, PVC pipe, and expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam are identified as higher energy consumers during their life cycle, in contrast to concrete and cement mortar characterized by lower primary energy demands. The materials identified as high-carbon building materials are steel, stone, plaster, rebar, bitumen, concrete, glass, cement, gravel, and EPS foam. On the other hand, the materials identified as low-carbon building materials are masonry blocks, wood, tiles, bricks, drywall, MDF, and cement mortar. This research provides valuable insights for material selection and sustainable construction practices, emphasizing low-carbon materials to reduce environmental impact and contribute to the global effort to mitigate climate change through responsible construction choices.","PeriodicalId":292984,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Architectural Environment & Structural Engineering Research","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Architectural Environment & Structural Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30564/jaeser.v6i4.5964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In pursuit of environmental sustainability in the construction sector, this study employs a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) approach to evaluate the environmental impact of widely used building materials in Iran, with a particular focus on energy consumption and carbon footprint. The investigation encompasses 22 widely used building materials, utilizing the Ecoinvent v3 database and Simapro8 software to assess critical environmental variables, including carbon dioxide (CO2) emission, required primary energy, water consumption, and thermal conductivity. The findings unveil the diverse environmental profiles of these materials, with thermal conductivity typically hovering around zero to 2 W/m.K for most, but with exceptions such as lime, aluminum, rebar, and steel exhibiting significantly higher values. Moreover, aluminum, ceramics, PVC pipe, and expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam are identified as higher energy consumers during their life cycle, in contrast to concrete and cement mortar characterized by lower primary energy demands. The materials identified as high-carbon building materials are steel, stone, plaster, rebar, bitumen, concrete, glass, cement, gravel, and EPS foam. On the other hand, the materials identified as low-carbon building materials are masonry blocks, wood, tiles, bricks, drywall, MDF, and cement mortar. This research provides valuable insights for material selection and sustainable construction practices, emphasizing low-carbon materials to reduce environmental impact and contribute to the global effort to mitigate climate change through responsible construction choices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用生命周期评估对建筑材料进行环境影响评估
为了追求建筑行业的环境可持续性,本研究采用了一种全面的生命周期评估(LCA)方法来评估伊朗广泛使用的建筑材料对环境的影响,尤其关注能源消耗和碳足迹。调查涵盖 22 种广泛使用的建筑材料,利用 Ecoinvent v3 数据库和 Simapro8 软件来评估关键的环境变量,包括二氧化碳 (CO2) 排放量、所需一次能源、耗水量和热传导率。研究结果揭示了这些材料对环境的不同影响,大多数材料的导热系数通常在零到 2 W/m.K 之间徘徊,但也有例外,如石灰、铝、螺纹钢和钢材的导热系数明显更高。此外,铝、陶瓷、聚氯乙烯(PVC)管和发泡聚苯乙烯(EPS)泡沫塑料在其生命周期内被认定为能耗较高的材料,而混凝土和水泥砂浆的主要能源需求较低。钢材、石材、石膏、钢筋、沥青、混凝土、玻璃、水泥、砾石和发泡聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料被确定为高碳建筑材料。另一方面,被确定为低碳建筑材料的材料有砌块、木材、瓷砖、砖块、干墙、中密度纤维板和水泥砂浆。这项研究为材料选择和可持续建筑实践提供了宝贵的见解,强调低碳材料可减少对环境的影响,并通过负责任的建筑选择为全球减缓气候变化的努力做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of Spatial Disorientation and Wayfinding Challenges in Buildings Using Axial Analysis: A Case of Hospital Buildings in Nigeria Environmental Impact Assessment of Building Materials Using Life Cycle Assessment Understanding the Challenges of Implementing Green Roofs in Multi-Family Apartment Buildings: A Case Study in Khulna Sustainability of Bridges: Risk Mitigation for Natural Hazards Asphalt Pavement Temperature Fluctuation: Impacts and solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1