Status-seeking with a negative image – The changing position of Visegrád countries in the international community between 2004 and 2020

IF 1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE New Perspectives Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1177/2336825x231221999
M. Szalai, Nikolett Garai
{"title":"Status-seeking with a negative image – The changing position of Visegrád countries in the international community between 2004 and 2020","authors":"M. Szalai, Nikolett Garai","doi":"10.1177/2336825x231221999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the literature on small state foreign policy predicts that smaller states of the international community attempt to enlarge their influence by seeking a constructive status or proving their adherence to positive norms, the cases in which small states use a negative image to better their international position are almost completely neglected. The article aims to assess how the status of Visegrád countries in interstate society changed since their accession to the European Union in light of the generally negative perception of their governments’ ideological background connected to different kinds of populism and nationalism. Using the GDELT Database, the number of government-level interactions initiated towards the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia was analysed in a European context between 2004 and 2020. The results of the inquiry showed a drastic decrease in the interactions initiated towards the four countries between 2004 and the mid-2010s with a slightly higher ratio of confrontative interactions than in the case of other small and middle-sized states. Data show that Hungary, governed by populist parties since 2010, witnessed the smallest drop in attention in the last decade. These results defy the expectations of the small state literature and suggest a more complicated relationship between international status and the image of small states.","PeriodicalId":42556,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825x231221999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the literature on small state foreign policy predicts that smaller states of the international community attempt to enlarge their influence by seeking a constructive status or proving their adherence to positive norms, the cases in which small states use a negative image to better their international position are almost completely neglected. The article aims to assess how the status of Visegrád countries in interstate society changed since their accession to the European Union in light of the generally negative perception of their governments’ ideological background connected to different kinds of populism and nationalism. Using the GDELT Database, the number of government-level interactions initiated towards the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia was analysed in a European context between 2004 and 2020. The results of the inquiry showed a drastic decrease in the interactions initiated towards the four countries between 2004 and the mid-2010s with a slightly higher ratio of confrontative interactions than in the case of other small and middle-sized states. Data show that Hungary, governed by populist parties since 2010, witnessed the smallest drop in attention in the last decade. These results defy the expectations of the small state literature and suggest a more complicated relationship between international status and the image of small states.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以负面形象寻求地位--2004 至 2020 年间维谢格拉德国家在国际社会中的地位变化
有关小国外交政策的文献预测,国际社会中的小国试图通过寻求建设性地位或证明其遵守积极规范来扩大其影响力,而小国利用负面形象来改善其国际地位的案例几乎完全被忽视。本文旨在评估自加入欧盟以来,由于人们普遍认为维舍格拉德国家政府的意识形态背景与各种民粹主义和民族主义有关,因此这些国家在国家间社会中的地位发生了怎样的变化。通过使用 GDELT 数据库,我们分析了 2004 至 2020 年间在欧洲范围内针对捷克共和国、匈牙利、波兰和斯洛伐克发起的政府层面互动的数量。调查结果显示,2004 年至 2010 年代中期,针对这四个国家的互动急剧减少,对抗性互动的比例略高于其他中小国家。数据显示,自 2010 年以来由民粹主义政党执政的匈牙利在过去十年中的关注度下降幅度最小。这些结果打破了小国文献的预期,表明国际地位与小国形象之间的关系更为复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Perspectives
New Perspectives POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: New Perspectives is an academic journal that seeks to provide interdisciplinary insight into the politics and international relations of Central and Eastern Europe. New Perspectives is published by the Institute of International Relations Prague.
期刊最新文献
The spatial repercussions of Russia’s war in Ukraine: Region(alism)s, borders, insecurities Understanding the grain deal and its pitfalls: Going beyond food security? The grammars of globalisation and the languages of regionalism: The war in Ukraine as a milestone and a test Polling to vaccination stations: Brexit’s influence on immunisation uptake Russian war, Estonian exceptions: Sovereignty, governmentality, biopolitics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1