Optical coherence tomography profile of macular structure and ocular dominance in young adults

Salma I.E. Hagar, Atif B.M Ali, Abd Elaziz Elmadina, S. Alrasheed, Raghda F. Mutwali
{"title":"Optical coherence tomography profile of macular structure and ocular dominance in young adults","authors":"Salma I.E. Hagar, Atif B.M Ali, Abd Elaziz Elmadina, S. Alrasheed, Raghda F. Mutwali","doi":"10.4102/aveh.v82i1.853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ocular dominance is used clinically for decisions on monovision in contact lens wear and treating binocular vision anomalies.Aim: This study aimed to investigate the association between macular structure and ocular dominance in normal-sighted young adult Sudanese by using optical coherence tomography (OCT).Setting: The study was conducted at Al-Neelain eye hospital, Faculty of optometry and visual sciences, Khartoum, Sudan.Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional and comparative study was conducted in 160 eyes of 80 healthy young adults. Central macular thickness (CMT), peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (NFL) thickness and inner retinal layers were investigated in each subject using OCT. Hole-in-the-card was used to detect ocular dominance.Results: The findings showed that the mean value of CMT for dominant eyes was slightly thicker (224.53 ± 17.18 μm) than in non-dominant eyes (224.36 ± 16.18 μm; P = 0.947). Whereas NFL thickness for dominant eyes was thicker at 31.87 ± 10.43 μm than in non-dominant 130.83 ± 10.30 μm with P = 0.528. In general, there were no highly significant differences between dominant eyes and non-dominant eyes found in macular parameters (P  0.05).Conclusion: Central macular thickness, NFL, ganglion cell layer and retinal pigmented epithelium may have some impact on determining ocular dominance in healthy adults. We believe that the exact mechanism and effects of ocular dominance remain unclear. Thus, further evaluation is needed.Contribution: This study observed slight thicker in macular parameters for the dominant eye, particularly in CMT and NFL thickness.","PeriodicalId":7694,"journal":{"name":"African Vision and Eye Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Vision and Eye Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v82i1.853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ocular dominance is used clinically for decisions on monovision in contact lens wear and treating binocular vision anomalies.Aim: This study aimed to investigate the association between macular structure and ocular dominance in normal-sighted young adult Sudanese by using optical coherence tomography (OCT).Setting: The study was conducted at Al-Neelain eye hospital, Faculty of optometry and visual sciences, Khartoum, Sudan.Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional and comparative study was conducted in 160 eyes of 80 healthy young adults. Central macular thickness (CMT), peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (NFL) thickness and inner retinal layers were investigated in each subject using OCT. Hole-in-the-card was used to detect ocular dominance.Results: The findings showed that the mean value of CMT for dominant eyes was slightly thicker (224.53 ± 17.18 μm) than in non-dominant eyes (224.36 ± 16.18 μm; P = 0.947). Whereas NFL thickness for dominant eyes was thicker at 31.87 ± 10.43 μm than in non-dominant 130.83 ± 10.30 μm with P = 0.528. In general, there were no highly significant differences between dominant eyes and non-dominant eyes found in macular parameters (P  0.05).Conclusion: Central macular thickness, NFL, ganglion cell layer and retinal pigmented epithelium may have some impact on determining ocular dominance in healthy adults. We believe that the exact mechanism and effects of ocular dominance remain unclear. Thus, further evaluation is needed.Contribution: This study observed slight thicker in macular parameters for the dominant eye, particularly in CMT and NFL thickness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青壮年黄斑结构和眼球优势的光学相干断层扫描图谱
背景:目的:本研究旨在通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT),调查视力正常的苏丹年轻成年人的黄斑结构与眼球优势之间的关联:研究在苏丹喀土穆 Al-Neelain 眼科医院视光学和视觉科学系进行:方法:对 80 名健康年轻人的 160 只眼睛进行了前瞻性、横断面比较研究。使用 OCT 对每个受试者的黄斑中心厚度 (CMT)、毛细血管周围视网膜神经纤维层 (NFL) 厚度和视网膜内层进行了调查。采用卡孔法检测眼球优势:结果显示,显性眼的 CMT 平均值(224.53 ± 17.18 μm)比非显性眼(224.36 ± 16.18 μm;P = 0.947)稍厚。优势眼的 NFL 厚度为 31.87 ± 10.43 μm,高于非优势眼的 130.83 ± 10.30 μm(P = 0.528)。总体而言,显性眼与非显性眼在黄斑参数上没有非常显著的差异(P 0.05):结论:黄斑中心厚度、NFL、神经节细胞层和视网膜色素上皮可能对决定健康成年人的眼优势有一定影响。我们认为,眼优势的确切机制和影响仍不清楚。因此,还需要进一步评估:本研究观察到显性眼的黄斑参数略有增厚,尤其是 CMT 和 NFL 厚度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Vision and Eye Health
African Vision and Eye Health Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Optometrists’ perspectives on speciality programme development in South Africa Pathophysiology of dry eye disease and novel therapeutic agents Impact of spectacle wear on the quality of life of learners with hearing impairment in Ghana Clinical characteristics and associated factors of diabetic retinopathy in Sudanese patients Refractive error accuracy and user perceptions of a smartphone home-based tester
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1