Artificial intelligence and the right to memory

Favio Farinella
{"title":"Artificial intelligence and the right to memory","authors":"Favio Farinella","doi":"10.12957/rqi.2023.72636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract BackgroundAs an exploratory research, our paper aims to describe how social media platforms are reshaping our processes of memory-making. Artificial intelligence, algorithms and deep learning are changing the situation we dig into our past radically and forever, determining what is memorable to us. We relate the right to identity with individual memory and the incidence of memory processes in the identity of each person. Finally, we characterize the way in which technology alters our memory through different ways.MethodsThis is basic research. We use qualitative methods to understand people's beliefs, experiences, attitudes, behavior, and interactions with social media and AI. We make use of sources of international and domestic Law.ResultsResults have implications for new well-being interventions which take into account the relationship between internet and AI on human memory and the incidence they have in the re-creation of the human right to identity.ConclusionsWe as humans increasingly tend to rely on the internet as an external hard drive of memories. This change deprives us of the natural process of remembering things. In due time, individual changes in the process of remembering will impact the social process, changing as a result the social memory of a community. As a result, the personal and the social categories of the right to identity will also be altered.","PeriodicalId":187075,"journal":{"name":"REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS","volume":"97 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2023.72636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract BackgroundAs an exploratory research, our paper aims to describe how social media platforms are reshaping our processes of memory-making. Artificial intelligence, algorithms and deep learning are changing the situation we dig into our past radically and forever, determining what is memorable to us. We relate the right to identity with individual memory and the incidence of memory processes in the identity of each person. Finally, we characterize the way in which technology alters our memory through different ways.MethodsThis is basic research. We use qualitative methods to understand people's beliefs, experiences, attitudes, behavior, and interactions with social media and AI. We make use of sources of international and domestic Law.ResultsResults have implications for new well-being interventions which take into account the relationship between internet and AI on human memory and the incidence they have in the re-creation of the human right to identity.ConclusionsWe as humans increasingly tend to rely on the internet as an external hard drive of memories. This change deprives us of the natural process of remembering things. In due time, individual changes in the process of remembering will impact the social process, changing as a result the social memory of a community. As a result, the personal and the social categories of the right to identity will also be altered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能与记忆权
摘要 背景作为一项探索性研究,我们的论文旨在描述社交媒体平台如何重塑我们的记忆过程。人工智能、算法和深度学习正在从根本上永久性地改变我们挖掘过去的方式,决定了什么对我们来说是难忘的。我们将身份权与个人记忆以及记忆过程在每个人身份中的作用联系起来。最后,我们描述了技术通过不同方式改变我们记忆的方式。我们使用定性方法来了解人们的信念、经验、态度、行为以及与社交媒体和人工智能的互动。我们利用了国际和国内法律的资料来源。结果结果对新的福祉干预措施有影响,这些措施考虑到了互联网和人工智能对人类记忆的影响,以及它们在重新创造人类身份权方面的影响。结论我们人类越来越倾向于依赖互联网作为记忆的外部硬盘。这种变化剥夺了我们记忆事物的自然过程。随着时间的推移,记忆过程中的个体变化将影响社会过程,从而改变社区的社会记忆。因此,身份权的个人和社会类别也将随之改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DILEMAS BIOÉTICOS ENTRE A CIÊNCIA, O DIREITO E A RELIGIÃO LIBERTAD RELIGIOSA E LA IGUALDAD DE GÉNERO: APORTACIONES DEL RELATOR ESPECIAL SOBRE LIBERTAD DE RELIGIÓN O CREENCIAS RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AND GENDER EQUALITY: CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF ANÁLISE DO CASO DA BACIA HIDROGRÁFICA MATANZA-RIACHUELO SOB O ENFOQUE DA JURISPRUDÊNCIA AMBIENTAL LITIGÂNCIA CLIMÁTICA E O CASO URGENDA: ANÁLISE À LUZ DOS DIREITOS HUMANOS DA NECESSÁRIA TRANSPARÊNCIA INTRAPARTIDÁRIA: O compliance como mecanismo de robustecimento do processo eleitoral democrático
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1