Ekaterinburg (Sverdlovsk) During NEP Years: Organization of City Government System

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Nauchnyi Dialog Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-9-372-389
S. V. Vorobyov
{"title":"Ekaterinburg (Sverdlovsk) During NEP Years: Organization of City Government System","authors":"S. V. Vorobyov","doi":"10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-9-372-389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the activities of various levels of government structures (city council, gubernatorial, district and regional executive and party bodies) in managing EkaterinburgSverdlovsk during the NEP years. It is established that during this period, the central government was faced with a choice between centralism or decentralization in local governance and the delineation of powers between councils and different levels of regional government. It is noted that in practice, a multilevel system of city management was formed, which had both positive and negative aspects. It is shown that on the one hand, in conditions of weak city authority and a shortage of city budget, the intervention of regional authorities in urban issues and financial injections from their side allowed for the successful resolution of acute urban economic issues. On the other hand, such a system of power significantly limited the authority of the city council, pushing it to other government structures. As a result, the author concludes that the city council was not a full-fledged, independent administrative unit, and its competence in managing the city was significantly limited. This situation is explained by the fact that the main decisions regarding the directions of city development were made by regional authorities, which did not always positively affect the effectiveness of urban management.","PeriodicalId":43602,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnyi Dialog","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnyi Dialog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-9-372-389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the activities of various levels of government structures (city council, gubernatorial, district and regional executive and party bodies) in managing EkaterinburgSverdlovsk during the NEP years. It is established that during this period, the central government was faced with a choice between centralism or decentralization in local governance and the delineation of powers between councils and different levels of regional government. It is noted that in practice, a multilevel system of city management was formed, which had both positive and negative aspects. It is shown that on the one hand, in conditions of weak city authority and a shortage of city budget, the intervention of regional authorities in urban issues and financial injections from their side allowed for the successful resolution of acute urban economic issues. On the other hand, such a system of power significantly limited the authority of the city council, pushing it to other government structures. As a result, the author concludes that the city council was not a full-fledged, independent administrative unit, and its competence in managing the city was significantly limited. This situation is explained by the fact that the main decisions regarding the directions of city development were made by regional authorities, which did not always positively affect the effectiveness of urban management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新经济时期的叶卡捷琳堡(斯维尔德洛夫斯克):市政府系统的组织
文章讨论了新经济政策时期各级政府机构(市议会、州长、地区和区域行政机构以及党派机构)在管理叶卡捷琳堡-斯维尔德洛夫斯克方面的活动。研究表明,在这一时期,中央政府在地方管理中面临着集权还是分权的选择,以及市议会和各级州政府之间的权力划分问题。研究指出,在实践中形成了多层次的城市管理体制,这既有积极的一面,也有消极的一面。一方面,在城市权力薄弱和城市预算短缺的条件下,地区当局对城市问题的干预和财政注资使尖锐的城市经济问题得以成功解决。另一方面,这种权力体系极大地限制了市议会的权力,将其推向其他政府机构。因此,作者得出结论,市议会并不是一个成熟、独立的行政单位,其管理城市的能力受到了很大限制。造成这种情况的原因是,有关城市发展方向的主要决定是由地区当局做出的,这并不总是对城市管理的有效性产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nauchnyi Dialog
Nauchnyi Dialog HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
215
期刊最新文献
Development of Gold Mining Industry in Yakutia in 1920s Relations between Siberian and Kazakh Khanates in 15th-16th Centuries Features of Sheriff Court in Scotland in Early 19th Century (Exemplified by Selkirkshire County) Legal Historians of Russian Diaspora in 1920s—1930s Iran in South Caucasus: Foreign Policy Strategy and Regional Relations with Russia (1991—2021)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1