Plasma Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches Across Varying Flavours and Nicotine Content *

M. McEwan, L. Haswell, Sarah Baxter-Wright, Filimon Meichanetzidis, Tao Jin, George Hardie
{"title":"Plasma Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches Across Varying Flavours and Nicotine Content *","authors":"M. McEwan, L. Haswell, Sarah Baxter-Wright, Filimon Meichanetzidis, Tao Jin, George Hardie","doi":"10.2478/cttr-2023-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Background In recent years several nicotine products have been introduced that aim to offer smokers an alternative to cigarettes. As well as having fewer toxicants than combustible cigarettes, such nicotine products must be able to deliver nicotine efficiently. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the pharmacokinetics of nicotine absorption from nine oral tobacco-free smokeless nicotine pouches with varying nicotine content and flavours. Methods In a randomised, open-labelled, controlled, crossover clinical study, nicotine pharmacokinetics and product-liking were compared between nine nicotine pouches (Velo, BAT; 4- or 7-mg nicotine per pouch and in eight flavours). During a 10-day confinement period, 42 healthy adult participants, who were current smokers of combustible cigarettes, used a single study product once each day during a 45-min use period following overnight nicotine abstinence. Results Maximum plasma nicotine concentration and area under curve for nicotine concentration versus time 180 min after the start of study product use were significantly greater for the 7-mg than for the 4-mg Velo pouches (p < 0.0001). These values did not differ between flavours among the 7-mg Velo nicotine pouches after adjustment for multiple comparisons (both p > 0.003). The median time to maximum plasma nicotine concentrations and mean product-liking scores were similar regardless of nicotine content and flavour. Conclusions Regardless of flavour, nicotine pouches with the same nicotine content and formulation produce similar pharmacokinetic parameters and can deliver nicotine efficiently. Nicotine pouches could be a satisfying alternative for smokers switching from conventional cigarettes. [Contrib. Tob. Nicotine Res. 32 (2023) 130–139]","PeriodicalId":10723,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research","volume":"358 ","pages":"130 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to Tobacco & Nicotine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cttr-2023-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SUMMARY Background In recent years several nicotine products have been introduced that aim to offer smokers an alternative to cigarettes. As well as having fewer toxicants than combustible cigarettes, such nicotine products must be able to deliver nicotine efficiently. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the pharmacokinetics of nicotine absorption from nine oral tobacco-free smokeless nicotine pouches with varying nicotine content and flavours. Methods In a randomised, open-labelled, controlled, crossover clinical study, nicotine pharmacokinetics and product-liking were compared between nine nicotine pouches (Velo, BAT; 4- or 7-mg nicotine per pouch and in eight flavours). During a 10-day confinement period, 42 healthy adult participants, who were current smokers of combustible cigarettes, used a single study product once each day during a 45-min use period following overnight nicotine abstinence. Results Maximum plasma nicotine concentration and area under curve for nicotine concentration versus time 180 min after the start of study product use were significantly greater for the 7-mg than for the 4-mg Velo pouches (p < 0.0001). These values did not differ between flavours among the 7-mg Velo nicotine pouches after adjustment for multiple comparisons (both p > 0.003). The median time to maximum plasma nicotine concentrations and mean product-liking scores were similar regardless of nicotine content and flavour. Conclusions Regardless of flavour, nicotine pouches with the same nicotine content and formulation produce similar pharmacokinetic parameters and can deliver nicotine efficiently. Nicotine pouches could be a satisfying alternative for smokers switching from conventional cigarettes. [Contrib. Tob. Nicotine Res. 32 (2023) 130–139]
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同口味和尼古丁含量的口服尼古丁袋的血浆尼古丁药代动力学 *
摘要 背景 近年来推出了几种尼古丁产品,旨在为吸烟者提供香烟的替代品。与可燃香烟相比,此类尼古丁产品不仅毒性更低,而且必须能够有效地输送尼古丁。本研究旨在确定并比较九种不同尼古丁含量和口味的口服无烟尼古丁袋中尼古丁的吸收药代动力学。方法 在一项随机、开放标签、对照、交叉临床研究中,比较了九种尼古丁袋(Velo,BAT;每袋4或7毫克尼古丁,八种口味)的尼古丁药代动力学和产品喜爱度。在为期 10 天的禁烟期中,42 名健康的成年参与者(目前吸食可燃卷烟)在一夜尼古丁戒断后的 45 分钟使用期内,每天使用一次单一的研究产品。结果 在开始使用研究产品 180 分钟后,7 毫克 Velo 小袋的最大血浆尼古丁浓度和尼古丁浓度随时间变化的曲线下面积显著高于 4 毫克 Velo 小袋(p < 0.0001)。经多重比较调整后,7 毫克 Velo 尼古丁烟嘴的这些数值在不同口味之间没有差异(均 p > 0.003)。无论尼古丁含量和口味如何,达到最高血浆尼古丁浓度的中位时间和产品喜爱度的平均得分都相似。结论 无论尼古丁含量和配方如何,尼古丁袋都能产生相似的药代动力学参数,并能有效地输送尼古丁。尼古丁袋可作为一种令人满意的替代品,让吸烟者从传统香烟中解脱出来。[尼古丁研究 32 (2023) 130-139]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparative In Vitro Toxicological Screening of a Closed-End Heated Tobacco Product * Plasma Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches Across Varying Flavours and Nicotine Content * A Pumping Method for Assessing Airtightness of Packs - Application to Heated Tobacco Products * Purchase Intent and Product Appeal of Velo Nicotine Pouches Among Current Tobacco Users and Nonusers of Tobacco How do Risk Perceptions Drive Smokers to Completely Switch to a Smoke-Free Tobacco Product (IQOS™)? A Four-Country Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1